Meg Whitman - Demystified | 03/30/2009 8:30 am
Meg Whitman's Top Aides Tell All
Campaign spokesperson Mitch Zak and Women’s Coalition Chair Jillian
Manus spoke about Whitman’s gubernatorial leap, stance on Prop 8
and eating habits.

© AP
Mitch Zak (Whitman spokesperson): I can jump in here. She will be seated at a breakfast but she’s really trying to listen and connect. She doesn’t do enough eating because she focuses on the speech or meeting with folks. Then the event is over, and she’s maybe only nibbled on her plate.
Randi: I get it. "The Campaign Diet."
Mitch: It could be a derivative of the Hummingbird Diet.
Jillian: It’s like the space diet. I always felt that they should put food in powder form for people who are campaigning.
Randi: Right. It might be faster to drink rather than eat your daily food intake.
Jillian: Yes.
Randi: I’m a little confused about one issue: Regarding Whitman’s stance on Proposition 8 and gay marriage. She is against gay marriage but supports civil unions. Can you speak on that?
Mitch: I can help you on that one. Yes, she voted for Proposition 8, and to her that was a matter of her faith and her personal convictions. She does believe the term "marriage" should belong to the union of a man and a woman. But that said, she is absolutely a strong supporter of civil unions and it’s evident by her leadership at eBay. It was tremendously inclusive in that regard. The one other distinction that she made is that the folks who were legally married when the law was in California, those folks should stay married.
Randi: I see.
Mitch: So it’s not their fault that the law was what it was.
Randi: Thank you again, Jillian and Mitch. Before we finish, is there anything else you’d like to share?
Jillian: I would like to add that I say to my kids, "There’s a CEO, which is the head of a corporation, and a CEO, which is what I call the ‘Chief Everything Officer.’" Meg fits both bills.
Randi: As do many women.
Jillian: That’s exactly right.
Read more about: California, Government, Jillian Manus, Meg Whitman, Mitch Zak, News, Politics, Proposition 8, Randi Bernfeld, Republican, Unemployment























17 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
I see they haven’t told of her and of Chinese laborers working for her for 13-15 hrs a day for a pittance when she was CEO of StrideRight—or of the reporter who went with her to the plant in China and saw young kids putting glue on insoles with bare hands and who reported how the atmosphere was nearly unbreathable due to little or no ventilation. Same thing for her stewardship of Keds. And why was a Vietnamese woman put up for sale on E-Bay for 3 days under her stewardship wtihout anyone finding out about it? Ms Whitman, you may have a gazillion bucks but you need to answer some questions. These are legitimate questions you need to answer Ms Whitman.
Here’s a quote:
"Prior to eBay, Meg was the General Manager of Hasbro Inc.’s Preschool Division. In this position, Meg was responsible for global management and marketing…"
— National Labor Committee Report
And another:
Sixteen-year-olds put toxic glue onto Keds sneakers with their bare hands. When we visited the factory in July 1999, they were producing Keds sneakers for Stride Rite… When you went through the adhesive department where they worked your eyes stung from the strong chemical vapors. There was no special ventilation, nor were gloves or masks provided to the workers. The company general manager said they came to China "for the cheap labor" and "to get away from the unions in South Korea." According to the company the average wage was 42 cents an hour.— Another National Labor Committee Report
And you gotta love her nuanced position on gay marriage, which boils down to semantics:
And Whitman’s "faith?" She’s a Presbyterian! When I told a friend who is a Presbyterian minister in a large Southern city with a large Presbyterian population she was claming Presbyertianism as her rationale for opposing gay marriage, he howled with laughter.
Whitman has a major obstacle in California: She is a Republican. The party is down to its lowest registration in history: 31 percent. Young voters are staying away in droves. In December, California GOP strategist Tony Quinn summed up the state of his party: "The California Republican Party is dead. Call the undertaker, haul away the corpse."
And:
Whitman’s stance on gay marriage is political, not principled. Her problem is this: She cannot win the general election without attracting 20 - 30 percent of independent and Democratic voters (at least), but independent voter can’t vote in the GOP primary, so to get to the general, she has to win a majority of the 31 percent of hard-core (read: "anti-gay, anti-choice") right wing Republicans.
Whitman is also pro-choice, a fact that will also hurt her with the GOP base and makes her and fellow liberal Republican Steve Poizner vulnerable to a hard-right candidate like Reps. Dan Lungren or Tom McClintock, who would then have not a snowball’s chance in the general.
Whitman and Poizner know that they’re running the risk of replaying the campaign of the last liberal Republican who ran for governor, former LA Mayor Richard Riordan.In that campaign, Democrats ran ads detailing Riordan’s pro-choice record during the Republican Primary, which caused the GOP base to vote decidely for a right-wing extremist who was easily trounced by the Democratic candidate in the general.
Rudi G—another amazing post!
I don’t mind crossing party lines to vote for the best candidate, but her stance on Prop 8 means that I won’t be crossing the lines to vote for her. I will never cast a vote for someone who thinks its okay to discriminate against gay people, period.
Why would she want to sink herself into the California cesspool?
California, my home state, has skyrocketing taxes, skyrocketing welfare dockets, and businesses fleeing the state, along with the most productive people. We personally know 8 couples who have left the state after their employer moved or they got sick of the traffic, and taxes.
My husband was staying with a friend in Santa Monica last week. At 2am he heard fire from an AK-47 from the direction of the public golf course. His host reassurred him that it happens almost every night, and the cops don’t even bother to come out anymore it’s so prevalent.
The state has gone the way of DC, Detroit, Philly, and NYC in the 70’s: dangerous, over-taxed, hostile to business, with dirty failing schools.
Actually Rudy was able to turn NYC around, but I think California is hopeless because too many people want the government to be Santa Claus.
On April 1st the sales tax in California will increase. In my county, the sales tax will reach almost 10%. The unemployment rate for the State is now at 10.2% and still rising. The State income tax has risen as part of the deal to balance the 2009/10 fiscal budget. All State offices are asked to reduce their budgets…..no exceptions, again part of the budgetary deal.
Can the State turn itself around? Not without the help of business. This is still a very attractive State for businesses but the move to place more of the burden for paying for State government on the business community is having a negative effect. Businesses are leaving California and that is a sure sign of weakness. Is it a mass exodus? Not yet.
Meg Whitman will very probably win the gubernatorial race. One of her opponents will be San Francisco Mayor, Gavin Newsom. However, nothing is going to improve in California until the Legislature is taken away from the Democratic party. They can spend money as fast as any teenager and having spent all the money in California, they are now looking at the federal treasury. These politicians have to be voted out of office. I only hope Meg Whitman will not be a stand alone candidate and that her election will have whatever is the female equivalent of "coat-tails".
But first she has to convince a majority of the state’s 31 percent of voters who are registered Republican to vote for her, even though she is 1) pro-choice, 2) pro civil unions for gays and 3) a woman — and not for the other liberal Republican, Steve Poizner, who is 1) pro-choice, 2) pro gay marriage and 3) a man. (He’s also currently the insurance commissioner.) If these two split the vote of the GOP’s tiny "moderate" wing, it opens the door for a hard right-winger like Lungren or McClintock (or that numbskull Darrell Issa) to walk away with the primary win.
It’s more likely Jerry Brown will be the Dem than Newsome. There’s talk that Feinstein might step in. She would win in a rout.
The mistake Whitman made was choosing to run as a Republican in a state where less than a third of the voters are registered GOP. That was colossal bad judgment.
Jerry Brown???? Been there, done THAT!
In the words of the Dead Kennedies, "there’s the Governor Jerry Brown, always smiles and never frowns… California uber Alles!"
Feinstein won’t step in: it’s a step down for her to go into a gubernatorial position given her senority. I agree with Newsome as a more likely Dem candidate, or possibly Sean Penn will toss his stocking cap into the arena?
In any event, Meg has as good a chance as any, except for… Jerry Brown. (but thanks for a great laugh and a replay of the Dead Kennedies on my iPod!)