GM Bankruptcy | 06/01/2009 12:10 pm
Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm on GM Bankruptcy: 'We're Hitting Bottom'

As General Motors prepares itself for the largest industrial bankruptcy in American history, there’s not only the business ramifications to deal with, but a very human factor to take into account, as well.
"There is no doubt this is a cataclysmic event for us. It’s incredibly tough for the families and communities affected" by forthcoming GM plant closures in Michigan, Gov. Jennifer Granholm told MSNBC this morning. "Times are tough here, but you know what? So are we."
"This is a very tough day for Michigan" and the country, added Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-MI, noting that GM has been the "core of manufacturing" for the middle class in the United States. "These are incredibly difficult times for people who have done nothing more than worked hard their entire lives and made good automobiles."
Granholm said the "silver lining" to GM’s bankruptcy is that "we finally know we’re hitting bottom. We’re resilient and we now know where the end is gonna be."
The governor is encouraged by the federal government’s commitment to a "viable auto industry," and the fact that GM will come out of this with a lighter balance sheet is something to be cheerful about.
"I feel like the bleeding is about to be over," Granholm continued. "The doctor finally says we have one more painful operation and it’s gonna take you three months to heal, and the prognosis is good — we are going to heal … GM will be stronger."
Millions of workers have toiled at GM in the 100 years since the company was founded by William C. Durant, churning out cars like the Cadillac Aero Sedan in 1936, the 1953 XP-21 Firebird 1 — the first gas turbine automobile ever built and tested in the U.S.— GMC’s "Silversides" buses of the 1940s and your everyday Cadillac, Buick and Oldsmobiles that were favorites of families throughout the years.
For decades, automakers like GM provided good blue-collar jobs for men and women who — with their good paychecks, benefits and pensions — were able to provide well for their families. But between advances in manufacturing technology in general, which have allowed machines to do large chunks of the work, and global competition, among other factors, U.S. carmakers have been hit hard in recent years. And for the Big 3’s hometown of Detroit and greater Michigan, the auto malaise has had particularly dreary economic effects. GM and other car companies have laid off scads of workers in recent years, and another 21,000 are going to get pink slips under the upcoming reorganization.
"I know you’ve already seen more than your fair share of hard times," President Obama said today, referring to America’s auto workers. "I will not pretend the hard days are over … what you’re doing is making a sacrifice for the next generation … so that your children and all of our children can grow up in an America that still makes things, that still makes cars. That strives for a better future."
With wowOwow community members such as C jay and Victoria J expressing in our wOw Reports thread how GM’s bankruptcy hits their community and family, tell us below what the personal impact is of the fall of this American legacy.























54 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
James…….sad isn’t it????
It seems that the level playing field is in the bargain basement.
Selling in the American economy without employing in the American economy is not sustainable on a large scale. Outsourcing and off-shoring have been driving us down to a third-world economy for years, and the closer we get the harder it is to avert.
Right, Zera. Too many of our needs are being met by foreign companies.
posted this on another thread, but it’s more appropriate here:
GM’s sphere of influence (and this DOES NOT include any dealerships, which are independently owned - about a third of which will be discontinued) - among the plants and parts operation locations slated to close is the historic mighty Willow Run plant where previous owner Ford cranked out a bomber an hour during WWII.
http://detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090531/SPECIAL01/9052900…
My feelings are certainly mixed on this event. It’s tragic for the many out of work and the communities that suffer with them. Goodness knows, the US of all nations should be a leader in auto manufacture. But there’s the kicker. They aren’t because they were greedy and made poor decisions.
Our family has mostly purchased Japanese cars for decades now and the few times we didn’t, we definitely regretted it. Even when it was obvious that they were losing much of the market to foreign auto makers, they didn’t change their strategies. They continued to try to force oversized autos with high gas and maintenence demandss and expensive bells and whistles we didn’t need but missing certain factors we did want (e.g. 4 wheel drive in a car rather than truck) not to mention reliability so the vehicle was in our garage not the service garage. Instead of rethinking their plans, they tried to make those of us not foolish enough to buy American feel unpatriotic. They also took a trip to Japan with H.W. Bush to beg them to "play fair". It was embarrassing to see our bloated, over paid CEOs asking for cooperation from Japanese CEOS who didn’t earn such gradiose salaries. The Japanese were doing better because they offered better products that met customer needs. Bush threw up at the banquet table. Was it from jet lag or stress at knowing how innappropriate this trip was? We’ve had to bail out Chrysler before. It should have been allowed to die then. Instead, tax payer money let them continue as before and Iaccoca (can’t spell it) received the credit and obscene compensation.
I feel sorry for the workers. I appreciate we allowed these companies to become too big to fail. That’s too bad. They deserve it.
Let’s get somethign straight here. The Federal government has NEVER bailed out ANY US automaker before. When Chrysler was in trouble years ago the company went to the government to get help in obtaining outside financing. The loans Chrysler received were third party loans from financial companies, but the government agreed to back the loans in case Chrysler stumbled - no tax dollars were used or ever requested as part of the arrangement. For the entire time Chrysler owed those loans Iacocca took a $1 annual wage. Chrysler not only paid back its loans plus fees IN FULL (the government actually profited from the deal through imposed fees), but paid back the loans EARLY.
Another point of FACT: GM has been and continues to be the top selling automaker in the US. In April Ford regained enough market share to surpass Toyota to take the number two slot for the month.
Toyota even lost more money in the first quarter that GM did. GM began restructing some time ago but they didn’t move soon enough or fast enough. Their primary fault was they got caught short of cash on hand when the financial sector collapsed while Ford and Toyota didn’t. BTW Toyota’s North American engineering and tech center is scrambling right now, too, trying to reduce costs to avoid layoffs.
http://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/index.ssf/2009/05/toyota_quietly_pou…
Nonsense. Cars are not impulse sale items and a great many people didn’t purchase large vehicles at all. I’ve driven Ford Escorts for the last 15 years (I sold my last one with over 253K miles on it and my current one has 175K on it).
Families that have a need for capacity buy larger vehicles as does anyone who wants to tow a boat or trailer of any kind. That industries like construction and landscaping buy larger vehicles should be able to go unsaid, but some people don’t think beyond their own noses.