Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 03/24/2009 10:10 am

Morning-After Pill Court Ruling Breaks New Ground

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© Shutterstock
The politics of reproductive rights reached a turning point yesterday, when a federal court ruled that the FDA must make the morning-after pill available to 17-year-olds without a prescription, and to reconsider whether the drug, known as Plan B, should be available to all young women without a prescription.

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York in its 52-page ruling stated, "The FDA repeatedly and unreasonably delayed issuing a decision on Plan B for suspect reasons."

Despite scientific support for its distribution, the drug became mired in politics. In 2003 an FDA advisory panel recommended it be sold over the counter, but in 2004 the FDA refused to follow that recommendation. Pro-choice activists claimed right-wing pro-life politics were to blame, so they filed a lawsuit in 2005. In 2006 the FDA did make Plan B available to women 18 and over as an over-the-counter drug (prescriptions were required for anyone younger). But now this new ruling opens the door for access for more women.

Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, the group that filed the suit, hailed the ruling: "The court recognized that the FDA favored politics over science, ideology over women’s health and violated the law in the process."

The former head of the FDA’s Office of Women’s Health, Susan Wood, who resigned to protest the FDA’s handling of Plan B, said she was "delighted" with the ruling. Pro-life groups, of course, are not so happy.

The FDA now has 30 days to make Plan B available to 17-year-olds, and to review the court’s opinion.

32 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Chrome Toe
I have never understood how the moralists can be up in arms about the morning after pill. It’s the MORNING AFTER for gods sake. we’re going so far as saying the MORNING AFTER "cell" has a right to "live". ridiculous. you have no idea the morning after whether or not there is even anything trying to reproduce. it’s precautionary. can we not use condoms now because the morning OF might result in reproduction? people amaze me.
By Chrome Toe on 03/24/2009 10:26 am
Marjorie C.
If the morning-after pill is harmless self-medication, it should be allowed and available to 17-year olds.  I don’t have the ‘stomach’ for late-term, third trimester abortions, but a zygote…   well, it’s hard the think of that as more than just a cluster of cells.  I understand those who see more than that, and respect their point-of-view. 
By Marjorie C. on 03/24/2009 10:48 am
Slinky Binx
Finally! Science triumphs and the health of women is put first over ideology! All I can say is "Hallelujah"! 
By Slinky Binx on 03/24/2009 10:57 am
Cynthia Robinson

Tis one thing to make available this ‘morning after’ pill to women who have been raped, but to give this to girls is plain stupid!

What happened to waiting for sex? After all, a 17 y/o girl has the rest of her life to have sex!

By Cynthia Robinson on 03/24/2009 10:59 am
Dee T
Cynthia, unfortunately the reality is girls at age 17 and even younger ( try 12 and 13) are sexually active. Yes, bottom line is the need for parental interest and involvment in children’s lives, but in many cases music idols are more influential and too much freedom w/o oversight is allowed.
By Dee T on 03/24/2009 11:32 am
Sharon Jones
i agree totally!!
By Sharon Jones on 03/24/2009 1:50 pm
Sylvia M
It’s a choice as to use this medication or not.  For those who disagree with the use or even existence of the medication, they can choose not to use it. 
By Sylvia M on 03/24/2009 11:29 am
caj p
Seeing as some young girls are going to have sex at that age anyway I feel it is a good idea to make this pill available to them.  It would be nicer if we lived in a perfect world where they would wait but that is never going to happen so this is a good idea to prevent unwanted pregnancies or even worse abortions.  We live in the 21st Century and need to come to grips with the way things are in reality.
By caj p on 03/24/2009 12:53 pm
S.J. Morgan

I personally know a teen ( with her parents permission) who used it after an experience with a defective condom!  She also had to wait a week to take a pregnancy test to confirm it indeed worked.

It was the worst week of her life in fear of the outcome.

As her coach she reluctantly informed me to be excused from practice and was unable to participate in our activity until she was cleared by a doctor to as not pregnant to avoid liability issues or harm to the child if she was.

I was sworn to keep the issue in confidence and was at least glad she had sought help from her mother. 

I KNOW she learned from the experience and I suspect she takes further protection now or abstains from having sex at all…. But I would hate to think some would use it as a form of birth control coming in every week for the after pill.

By S.J. Morgan on 03/24/2009 12:59 pm
Marjorie C.

S. J.: …avoid liability issues or harm to the child if she was.

This is probably the ‘hitch’ with this pill.  It has to be used responsibly.  Take it willy-nilly any old time, and you run the risk of damaging a child rather than aborting it.   

By Marjorie C. on 03/25/2009 6:42 am
Gramma J

Marjorie, there is no way these pills can harm a "child".  All the pill does is prevent a fertilized egg from attaching.  It will not affect an egg that is already attached. 

By Gramma J on 03/25/2009 10:43 am
caj p
It would make sense for these girls to be on the pill on a regular basis anyway if they intend to have sex as many of them do and will.  It may work for some IF they remember to take it that is.   Whereas if they are on the normal everyday pill it would be much safer, at least if you are taking it on a regular basis the chances are you would remember taking it.  One here and there is so much easier to forget and could end up in a pregnancy and that would be very irresponsible.
By caj p on 03/24/2009 1:35 pm
Sharon Jones
Wow this subject could be a double bladed sword…one hand says yes …so permiscuous teens can protect themselves from unwanted pregnancies…the othe side is saying to your teen go ahead have merry sex with anyone disregarding the fact that it is wrong to do so and do not worry..now there is the the next morning pill!! I can only say i don’t think it is right…my opinion
By Sharon Jones on 03/24/2009 1:48 pm
DeBúrca obj
The morning after pill has been available in ‘Holy Catholic Ireland’ for quite some time, in fact, now the discussion is about making it over the counter.
By DeBúrca obj on 03/24/2009 2:09 pm
S.J. Morgan
I have a friend from Ireland…it does not work their either!  He has two (unmarried) sisters who were pregnant before they were 18.  Socialized medicine pays for them all to this day!
By S.J. Morgan on 03/24/2009 5:22 pm