Politics | 03/24/2009 10:10 am
Morning-After Pill Court Ruling Breaks New Ground

© Shutterstock
The politics of reproductive rights reached a turning point yesterday, when a federal court ruled that the FDA must make the morning-after pill available to 17-year-olds without a prescription, and to reconsider whether the drug, known as Plan B, should be available to all young women without a prescription.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York in its 52-page ruling stated, "The FDA repeatedly and unreasonably delayed issuing a decision on Plan B for suspect reasons."
Despite scientific support for its distribution, the drug became mired in politics. In 2003 an FDA advisory panel recommended it be sold over the counter, but in 2004 the FDA refused to follow that recommendation. Pro-choice activists claimed right-wing pro-life politics were to blame, so they filed a lawsuit in 2005. In 2006 the FDA did make Plan B available to women 18 and over as an over-the-counter drug (prescriptions were required for anyone younger). But now this new ruling opens the door for access for more women.
Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, the group that filed the suit, hailed the ruling: "The court recognized that the FDA favored politics over science, ideology over women’s health and violated the law in the process."
The former head of the FDA’s Office of Women’s Health, Susan Wood, who resigned to protest the FDA’s handling of Plan B, said she was "delighted" with the ruling. Pro-life groups, of course, are not so happy.
The FDA now has 30 days to make Plan B available to 17-year-olds, and to review the court’s opinion.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York in its 52-page ruling stated, "The FDA repeatedly and unreasonably delayed issuing a decision on Plan B for suspect reasons."
Despite scientific support for its distribution, the drug became mired in politics. In 2003 an FDA advisory panel recommended it be sold over the counter, but in 2004 the FDA refused to follow that recommendation. Pro-choice activists claimed right-wing pro-life politics were to blame, so they filed a lawsuit in 2005. In 2006 the FDA did make Plan B available to women 18 and over as an over-the-counter drug (prescriptions were required for anyone younger). But now this new ruling opens the door for access for more women.
Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, the group that filed the suit, hailed the ruling: "The court recognized that the FDA favored politics over science, ideology over women’s health and violated the law in the process."
The former head of the FDA’s Office of Women’s Health, Susan Wood, who resigned to protest the FDA’s handling of Plan B, said she was "delighted" with the ruling. Pro-life groups, of course, are not so happy.
The FDA now has 30 days to make Plan B available to 17-year-olds, and to review the court’s opinion.
Read more about: Federal Court Ruling, Health, Morning After Pill, Nancy Northup, News, Politics, Reproductive Rights, Science, Susan Wood























32 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Tis one thing to make available this ‘morning after’ pill to women who have been raped, but to give this to girls is plain stupid!
What happened to waiting for sex? After all, a 17 y/o girl has the rest of her life to have sex!
I personally know a teen ( with her parents permission) who used it after an experience with a defective condom! She also had to wait a week to take a pregnancy test to confirm it indeed worked.
It was the worst week of her life in fear of the outcome.
As her coach she reluctantly informed me to be excused from practice and was unable to participate in our activity until she was cleared by a doctor to as not pregnant to avoid liability issues or harm to the child if she was.
I was sworn to keep the issue in confidence and was at least glad she had sought help from her mother.
I KNOW she learned from the experience and I suspect she takes further protection now or abstains from having sex at all…. But I would hate to think some would use it as a form of birth control coming in every week for the after pill.
S. J.: …avoid liability issues or harm to the child if she was.
This is probably the ‘hitch’ with this pill. It has to be used responsibly. Take it willy-nilly any old time, and you run the risk of damaging a child rather than aborting it.
Marjorie, there is no way these pills can harm a "child". All the pill does is prevent a fertilized egg from attaching. It will not affect an egg that is already attached.