Julia Reed | 06/25/2009 10:45 am
Mrs. Mark Sanford Is No Silda Spitzer, by Julia Reed
My first thought, looking at the puffy, bloodshot eyes of South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, was, "Do these guys NEVER learn from the mistakes of their elders?" Although there are legions of examples of pols who strayed and got caught they could choose from – I’m not referring to Bill Clinton or Gary Hart or … pick a name – in this case, there is a particularly fitting example Sanford should have been mindful of: Wilbur Mills.
I have quoted the wise words of Mills, the late representative from Arkansas and the powerful chairman of the House Ways and Means committee, many times before: "Never drink champagne with a foreigner." Mills was referring to Fanne Fox, the stripper known as "The Argentine Firecracker" with whom he was discovered cavorting in the tidal basin. Apparently, Sanford drank in a lot more than that from Maria, the Argentine chauffeur, a woman he has considered a "friend" for eight years. Man, these guys never fail to disappoint – ridiculous cover stories (hiking alone on the Appalachian trail? Really?) are always blown, and we are left with hilarious images and bits of info: Monica’s blue dress; Spitzer’s black socks; and now, Sanford’s e-mail, leaked to The State newspaper, in which he praises the curves of his lover’s hips along with her "erotic beauty" and "magnificent gentle kisses," and describes himself as a man bound up in "a hopelessly impossible situation of love."
In addition to seriously pissing off his wife, who apparently found out what was going on a few months ago and asked for a separation two weeks ago, he has further narrowed the Republican field of 2012 presidential contenders. (Nevada Sen. John Ensign’s chances bit the dust after his longtime affair with an aide was revealed only a week ago.) Sanford has already resigned from his post as chairman of the Republican Governors’ Association, where he will be succeeded by my good friend Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, who is already running and who is one of the smartest people I know.
But back to the Sanford saga: the most refreshing thing about his news conference yesterday was that Sanford was the only one crying. There was no dutiful wife, in dress and pearls, standing shell-shocked and red-eyed beside him á la Silda Spitzer. Jenny Sanford says she requested the separation in order to maintain her "dignity and self-respect." In response to their troubles, the couple had been attending an intense Bible study group, and Jenny, a tad too predictably, says she’ll take her husband back, but only "in time" and only "if he continues to work toward reconciliation with a true spirit of humility and repentance." It must be said, she is giving herself a lot of outs on that one. And I would not characterize quickie trips to Argentina as exactly in keeping with "the true spirit of repentance." From the looks of things (not to mention the video of his distraught, stream-of-consciousness press conference) no amount of praying is going to mend Sanford’s broken heart over this present-day Argentine Firecracker.
I have quoted the wise words of Mills, the late representative from Arkansas and the powerful chairman of the House Ways and Means committee, many times before: "Never drink champagne with a foreigner." Mills was referring to Fanne Fox, the stripper known as "The Argentine Firecracker" with whom he was discovered cavorting in the tidal basin. Apparently, Sanford drank in a lot more than that from Maria, the Argentine chauffeur, a woman he has considered a "friend" for eight years. Man, these guys never fail to disappoint – ridiculous cover stories (hiking alone on the Appalachian trail? Really?) are always blown, and we are left with hilarious images and bits of info: Monica’s blue dress; Spitzer’s black socks; and now, Sanford’s e-mail, leaked to The State newspaper, in which he praises the curves of his lover’s hips along with her "erotic beauty" and "magnificent gentle kisses," and describes himself as a man bound up in "a hopelessly impossible situation of love."
In addition to seriously pissing off his wife, who apparently found out what was going on a few months ago and asked for a separation two weeks ago, he has further narrowed the Republican field of 2012 presidential contenders. (Nevada Sen. John Ensign’s chances bit the dust after his longtime affair with an aide was revealed only a week ago.) Sanford has already resigned from his post as chairman of the Republican Governors’ Association, where he will be succeeded by my good friend Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, who is already running and who is one of the smartest people I know.
But back to the Sanford saga: the most refreshing thing about his news conference yesterday was that Sanford was the only one crying. There was no dutiful wife, in dress and pearls, standing shell-shocked and red-eyed beside him á la Silda Spitzer. Jenny Sanford says she requested the separation in order to maintain her "dignity and self-respect." In response to their troubles, the couple had been attending an intense Bible study group, and Jenny, a tad too predictably, says she’ll take her husband back, but only "in time" and only "if he continues to work toward reconciliation with a true spirit of humility and repentance." It must be said, she is giving herself a lot of outs on that one. And I would not characterize quickie trips to Argentina as exactly in keeping with "the true spirit of repentance." From the looks of things (not to mention the video of his distraught, stream-of-consciousness press conference) no amount of praying is going to mend Sanford’s broken heart over this present-day Argentine Firecracker.
Read more about: Bill Clinton, Gary Hart, Infidelity, Jenny Sanford, Mark Sanford, News, Politics, Relationships, Silda Spitzer, Wilbur Mills

























161 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Thanks, Libra — and you’re right. The MSM was dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Edwards affair, and this while the man was aspiring to the country’s highest office; they didn’t have to be asked twice about someone in a substantially less significant role than that which Edward hoped to gain.
Also, have to agree with you, deber — I would rather not have people think that an official’s betrayal of and lying to one person is unimportant as opposed to betraying and lying to others. After all, we’re supposed to trust these people; if they can betray and cheat the people closest to them, why not us "nobodies"? And I’m not saying a mistake should ruin a person’s life or political career; just that when they think lying and betraying people who trust them is perfectly legitimate, and when any and all remorse is merely for being caught, the red flags do — and should — go up!
Wrong Rachel, Sanford was going to run in 12, now he won’t. Also, people in here and elsewhere, even on Progressive Radio were furious with Edwards and were not calling for the subject to be dropped. I was furious with both him and his wife for not refraining from running for president under the circumstances because, had he won the primary and that scandal had come out, McCain probably would have won.
Again, Edwards was not an elected official and when he was campaigning, he was not calling for legislation to protect ‘the sanctity of marriage’.
Or Senator Ensign, or Larry Craig, or she could have mentioned Newt Gingrich or Henry Hyde if she wanted to go back a few years. The list is quite big actually.
Edwards is fair game, but he actually was not an elected official when he was cheating, so I suppose that is apples and oranges.
DeBurca: …but he actually was not an elected official when he was cheating
If that’s the criteria, how about Spitzer… does he fit the profile?
DeBurca: Democrats were as critical as anyone.
From what I can see, there is no one here on this site supporting Sanford’s behavior. The Republicans are disgusted. The Democrats are disgusted, but they are also trying to make political hay out of the situation. I just don’t think it’s going to fly.
Reader: …only had to go back as far as John Edwards.
Or Eliot Spitzer.
I agree. Rachel, it was clear that emotions played a big part in the Sanford saga and evidently his connection with this woman/friend has been 8 years in the making. I feel badly for politicians because sometimes I think we the public force them to be the hypocrits we accuse them of being when they show themselves to be human. The public needs to worry less about whether or not there is lipstick on a politicans chair and more about the politicians views on things that impact the voter and the voter’s life.