Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Julia Reed | 06/25/2009 10:45 am

Mrs. Mark Sanford Is No Silda Spitzer, by Julia Reed

Julia Reed
My first thought, looking at the puffy, bloodshot eyes of South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, was, "Do these guys NEVER learn from the mistakes of their elders?" Although there are legions of examples of pols who strayed and got caught they could choose from – I’m not referring to Bill Clinton or Gary Hart or … pick a name – in this case, there is a particularly fitting example Sanford should have been mindful of: Wilbur Mills.

I have quoted the wise words of Mills, the late representative from Arkansas and the powerful chairman of the House Ways and Means committee, many times before: "Never drink champagne with a foreigner." Mills was referring to Fanne Fox, the stripper known as "The Argentine Firecracker" with whom he was discovered cavorting in the tidal basin. Apparently, Sanford drank in a lot more than that from Maria, the Argentine chauffeur, a woman he has considered a "friend" for eight years. Man, these guys never fail to disappoint – ridiculous cover stories (hiking alone on the Appalachian trail? Really?) are always blown, and we are left with hilarious images and bits of info: Monica’s blue dress; Spitzer’s black socks; and now, Sanford’s e-mail, leaked to The State newspaper, in which he praises the curves of his lover’s hips along with her "erotic beauty" and "magnificent gentle kisses," and describes himself as a man bound up in "a hopelessly impossible situation of love."

In addition to seriously pissing off his wife, who apparently found out what was going on a few months ago and asked for a separation two weeks ago, he has further narrowed the Republican field of 2012 presidential contenders. (Nevada Sen. John Ensign’s chances bit the dust after his longtime affair with an aide was revealed only a week ago.) Sanford has already resigned from his post as chairman of the Republican Governors’ Association, where he will be succeeded by my good friend Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, who is already running and who is one of the smartest people I know.

But back to the Sanford saga: the most refreshing thing about his news conference yesterday was that Sanford was the only one crying. There was no dutiful wife, in dress and pearls, standing shell-shocked and red-eyed beside him á la Silda Spitzer. Jenny Sanford says she requested the separation in order to maintain her "dignity and self-respect." In response to their troubles, the couple had been attending an intense Bible study group, and Jenny, a tad too predictably, says she’ll take her husband back, but only "in time" and only "if he continues to work toward reconciliation with a true spirit of humility and repentance." It must be said, she is giving herself a lot of outs on that one. And I would not characterize quickie trips to Argentina as exactly in keeping with "the true spirit of repentance." From the looks of things (not to mention the video of his distraught, stream-of-consciousness press conference) no amount of praying is going to mend Sanford’s broken heart over this present-day Argentine Firecracker.

161 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

James the Game
These clowns deserve no second chance.
By James the Game on 06/25/2009 12:06 pm
Diana T

Good for the wife for not doing the obligatory Standing By The Side of Philandering Husband. 

When are people going to learn that anything you write on emails can be traced?  I suspect he was using the computer in his office—hello! it’s a State Owned Machine—a good hacker can go right into it. 

Strangely, I’m not surprised with yet another high profile type getting involved.  Happens all the time.  What disgusted me was the irresponsibility of leaving the whole State of S. Carolina high and dry and shirking his duties as Governor.  For this reason, he has proven he is not governor material and should resign—effective today..

By Diana T on 06/25/2009 12:21 pm
F Fox

As a person, okay, he betrayed his wife, but by the emails, this other woman was offering him something he wasn’t getting in his marriage, and I would suspect his career most significantly. He discusses that Jenny (or someone else) admired his mother but said that it was a shame she had not accomplished anything…while he writes to Maria that what his mother had done was to give him "unconditional love" which enabled him to succeed in the world. He states that he felt the same kind of love coming from Maria. So, he is looking inward rather than toward outward things like power and position. Also he apparently trusted no one.   Whether this affair represents a deep love or something passing, he obviously was not happy with his career or situation. That his "confidante" for eight years was not his wife, but a woman thousands of miles away, says something about his marriage. I don’t think he was simply having a sexual escapade. His wife apparently worked tirelessly for him but perhaps he thought that she only loved him if he performed.

I am familiar with situations like this and the whole thing makes me very sad.  This is aside from his position as governor, and aside from his political party. Not onlyare politic dirty, but politics is an extremely difficult and pressured career.

By F Fox on 06/25/2009 12:21 pm
DeBúrca obj
Wow, amazing, Ms Reed has managed to write a whole article supposedly about the Sanford story the purpose of which appears to be to mention Democrats who cheated. What, couldn’t you think of any other Republicans Ms Reed? Need any help?
By DeBúrca obj on 06/25/2009 12:33 pm
deber B
Libra Lady has already posted a list and it seems to be equal between the democrats and the republicans.   It is truly a personal choice.
By deber B on 06/25/2009 12:36 pm
DeBúrca obj
Well now, go through the list and see how many of those Democrats ran for office on a ‘family values’ platform and used their office to attempt to legislate on the personal lives of others, then check the same for the Republicans on that list.
By DeBúrca obj on 06/25/2009 12:42 pm
deber B
You are really disappointing me, Deburca, because you are barking up a tree.   You just stated in a previous posts that you believed in family values.    Which one is it?
By deber B on 06/25/2009 12:58 pm
Community Manager
Let’s keep this on-topic of the people in the article and not each other please.
By Community Manager on 06/25/2009 1:26 pm
DeBúrca obj

I don’t know how to explain it any simpler. I believe and live my own family values and I don’t need politicians legislating them. I don’t need gays to be deprived of their right to marry in order for me to be faithful in my own marriage and I don’t need a party calling itself a ‘family values party" while it votes against insurance for children, funding of schools, a public option of insurance for all Americans, and while it condones torture, unnecessary wars and the death penalty and men who cheat on their wives trying to legislate our country’s moral values.

The Republican Party pimps the term ‘family values’ while it votes the opposite and while some of it’s biggest mouths are cheating on their wives. This guy Sanford not only pimped the term ‘family values’ but he fought to try to keep the stimulus money out of his state that was to help the unemployed, all the while he is spending tax payer money to visit his mistress in a foreign country.

I believe in real family values. I don’t believe in pimping the term while acting and voting the opposite, and THAT is the Republican Party. 

By DeBúrca obj on 06/25/2009 1:29 pm
deber B
Thanks for replying, however, we are both off topic here so we’ll pick it up somewhere else if we can.
By deber B on 06/25/2009 1:33 pm
DeBúrca obj
I was referring to people in the article, you were referring to me and my belief in family values, that’s the difference.
By DeBúrca obj on 06/25/2009 1:48 pm
T P
Thanks Deber for stating the obvious.
By T P on 06/25/2009 4:18 pm
James the Game
Yeah, politics doesn’t have much to do with adultery, infidelity or zippers.
By James the Game on 06/25/2009 6:28 pm
MK P

Honestly, I felt sorry for the guy (Sanford) - he was obviously so conflicted.   Do political pressures force these men to stay in their marriages rather than divorce?    As he said, he ended up hurting his wife, his sons, AND his mistress.   Did he feel that ending his marriage would ruin his political career — so he tried to have it both ways?   I’ve never understood why voters feel they have a right to know what goes on in politicians’ marriages (or relationships).   If this guy had just been smart and turned the reins of power over to the back-up guy — I don’t think any of this should have been anyone’s business.

By MK P on 06/25/2009 12:45 pm
TS Gunther

My God woman, you live in Louisiana and you fail to mention Sen. David Vitter, Republican of the State of Louisiana. Doesn’t he qualify as a cheater in your eyes?  

By TS Gunther on 06/25/2009 12:56 pm