Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Nancy Pelosi | 03/11/2009 8:30 am

Report: Pelosi Uses Military Planes Like Private Jet

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© Getty Images

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi seems to treat the Air Force like her own personal airline.

Well, that’s according to Judicial Watch, a public interest group that has Defense Department documents dishing the dirt on Pelosi’s frequent requests for military air travel. Pelosi apparently really likes the G5 plane, in particular.

Here are some highlights, per Judicial Watch:

•    Pelosi’s staff demanded certain aircraft and were angry when requested military planes were not available. "It is my understanding there are no G5s available for the House during the Memorial Day recess. This is totally unacceptable … The speaker will want to know where the planes are …" wrote Kay King, Director of the House Office of Interparliamentary Affairs. In another e-mail, King writes: "This is not good news, and we will have some very disappointed folks, as well as a very upset speaker."

•    After a series of Pelosi staff requests for military aircraft, one DoD official wrote, "Any chance of politely querying [Pelosi’s team] if they really intend to do all of these or are they just picking every weekend? There’s no need to block every weekend ‘just in case’…" Apparently Pelosi’s staff has a history of last-minute schedule changes and cancellations, which screwed up the flight staff.

•    In May 2008 Pelosi asked that her husband join her on a Congressional Delegation (CODEL) into Iraq. The DoD had to explain its policy prohibiting spouses from joining CODELs in combat zones.

•    Pelosi requested an Army escort and three military planes to transport the speaker and other members of Congress to Ohio, for the funeral of the late Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones, in "exception to standard policy."

"Taken together, these documents show that Speaker Pelosi treats the Air Force like her personal airline," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "Not only does Speaker Pelosi issue unreasonable requests for military travel, but her office seems unconcerned about wasting taxpayer money with last minute cancellations and other demands."

Pelosi’s office argues that the demands of her transcontinental flights, as well as security, dictate her plane choice. But the news, of course, is not going unnoticed, particularly by conservative commentators, given that in 2007, she promised that the House would become the first legislative body in the world to zero out its carbon footprint on the planet by an already-expired date.

Michelle Malkin writes in the New York Post:

As speaker, Pelosi is entitled to reasonable military protection and transport. But it’s the size of the planes, the frequency of requests and last-minute cancellations, and the political nature of many of her trips that scream out for accountability. And, of course, it’s the hypocrisy. There’s the eco-hypocrisy of the Democratic leader who wags her finger at the rest of us for our too-big carbon footprints, and crusades for massive taxes and regulation to reduce global warming. Then there’s the Bay Area hypocrisy of the woman who represents one of the most anti-military areas of the country soaking up military resources to shuttle her (and her many family members) across the country almost every weekend."

We wonder what Speaker Pelosi will have to say for herself.

41 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Al ias
Z, thank you for your reply.  I would agree with you that scrutiny is required by all us taxpayers.  My point was that the scrutiny requires an understanding of the difference between members of the executive branch and those in the legislative branch.  The executive branch has cooler toys to play with and does so often, but your point is well taken.  Just because you have the toys does not mean you should be loose with the keys…have a great day !
By Al ias on 03/11/2009 8:21 pm
Ro H
I am unaware of all the military orders and disorders, however, I do know that Speaker Pelosi IS in the ‘chain of command’ as third in line of the Presidency.
By Ro H on 03/12/2009 4:54 am
Al ias
Z, VPOTUS is the executive branch and already has dedicated aircraft.  VP Chaney would not be subject to the same rules as the Speaker. 
By Al ias on 03/11/2009 7:53 pm
Corinne M.

Thank you.

 # As already noted, the Speaker is second in line to the presidency
# The policy of providing the Speaker of the House with an Air Force airplane (when available) began after 9/11 by the Bush Administration for Dennis Hastert.
# When Pelosi took over, the House Sergeant at Arms (responsible for Member security) requested a plane large enough to reach her district non-stop (Hastert was from Illinois)
# The DoD makes the final decision
# The House employee listed by Judicial Watch doesn’t even work on Pelosi’s staff…they work for House Interparliamentary Affairs.

The report from Judicial Watch was recycled by Fox and Drudge and the fact that this item sources Michelle "Moonbat" Malkin is yet another reason to discount it.  Next phony controversy please.

By Corinne M. on 03/11/2009 10:08 am
Lori F.

You’re all wet Corinne. Pelosi is not second but third in line to the President!

The SOH is assigned a plane but Pelosi barks and think she is entitled to a plane beyond what is assigned to her!

and Michelle Malkin, Fox or Drudge had nothing to do with this comment!

You liberals are forever trying to defend the stupidity of Pelosi!

Plus, it 2009. Where is Pelosi ablility to conserve? Is she not worth over $22,000,000.00? Let her go buy her own G5!

Quit milking the tax payers!   

By Lori F. on 03/11/2009 10:20 am
Al ias
Lori, the Speaker is 2nd in line behind the VP, but its still scary that we have Biden, then Nancy….yikes !!
By Al ias on 03/11/2009 7:30 pm
Lori F.

But Judicial Watch said that Pelosi was notorious for making special demands for high-end aircraft, lodging last-minute cancellations and racking up additional expenses for the military. 

The e-mails showed repeated attempts by Pelosi aides to request aircraft, sometimes aggressively, and by Department of Defense officials to accommodate them. 

"I think that’s above and beyond what other members of Congress are doing and what is expected of our elected officials," said Jenny Small, a researcher with the group. 

In one e-mail, aide Kay King complained to the military that they had not made available any aircraft the House speaker wanted for Memorial Day recess. 

"It is my understanding there are NO G5s available for the House during the Memorial Day recess. This is totally unacceptable … The Speaker will want to know where the planes are," King wrote. 

In another, when told a certain type of aircraft would not be available, King wrote: "This is not good news, and we will have some very disappointed folks, as well as a very upset Speaker." 

Pelosi spokesman Nadeam Elshami said the report seemed to be based on only "a few e-mails," and defended the requests for military aircraft for her colleagues as a "function of the speaker’s office." Elshami said at least one of the requests in the above e-mails referenced requests made for other members. 

Pelosi’s office noted that the Department of Defense ultimately makes all decisions on use of military aircraft for travel, and that Pelosi is "extraordinarily appreciative" of the department’s effort to accommodate Congress. 

Click here to read the full report from Judicial Watch. 

By Lori F. on 03/11/2009 12:31 pm
Ro H

By Corinne M. on 03/11/2009 11:08 am

I agree with you!  I counted the President, VP and Speaker of the House - "…third in line…"

By Ro H on 03/12/2009 4:57 am
Marjorie C.

MM: "…hypocrisy of the woman who represents one of the most anti-military areas of the country soaking up military resources to shuttle her (and her many family members) across the country almost every weekend."

Not to mention the constant criticism of Governor Palin for bringing her children along during some of the campaigning.  Pelosi is a joke, and Congress should sincerely start thinking of impeaching her… the sooner the better.  This entitlement is only going to get worse.  It will be Porkulus Bill after Porkulus Bill until foreign nationals start taking over our homes because they, in fact, own the United States.  

 

By Marjorie C. on 03/11/2009 9:39 am
Lori F.
Ditto!
By Lori F. on 03/11/2009 10:21 am
Grande Camper

". . Porkulus Bill. . "

Huh??????????  What do you mean?

By Grande Camper on 03/11/2009 10:23 am
Belinda Joy
If Pelosi is truly abusing the privilege of using the military planes she should be brought to task for it. I hope President Obama is privy to this article and the results of Judicial Watch’s report in this regard. I believe him when he says he wants an administration AND wants to hold all facets of government to a higher standard that has complete transparency. Pelosi may need to learn the old days of doing things in the dark hoping they won’t be brought to light are gone.
By Belinda Joy on 03/11/2009 10:22 am
Ro H
By Belinda Joy on 03/11/2009 11:22 am Belinda, It seems that other Speakers have also used military planes for their travel, as well.  Distance seems to be the issue, here.  If it were a Republican, say from Alaska - would that be reason for impeachment?  Do ya s’pose?
By Ro H on 03/12/2009 5:01 am
Belinda Joy

Ro, that’s curious that you see it as a distance issue. From my vantage point in reading the article it sounds as if Speaker Pelosi is (or should I say her staff, we don’t really know if she is making these demands for the planes) exhibiting a sense of "entitlement" to the planes. Maybe for the very reason you mention, other Speakers have had them available for travel.

But that doesn’t make it right. Two wrongs do not a right make.  But hey Ro, until we hear a definitive answer to the charges from Pelosi, all of this is speculation.

By Belinda Joy on 03/12/2009 9:33 am
S.J. Morgan

Queen Nancy: Fly as I say, not as I fly
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2009

Queen Nancy: Fly as I say, not as I fly

Democrat Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is the Jennifer Lopez of congressional travel – fickle, demanding, and notoriously insensitive to the time, costs, and energy needed to accommodate her endless demands. On Tuesday, the indispensable government watchdog Judicial Watch released a trove of public records through the Freedom of Information Act on Pelosi’s travel arrangements with the U.S. military.

As Speaker of the House, Pelosi is entitled to a reasonable level of military protection and transport. But it’s the size of the planes, the frequency of requests and last-minute cancellations, and the political nature of many of her trips that scream out for accountability.

And, of course, it’s the double-barreled hypocrisy. There’s the eco-hypocrisy of the Democrat leader who wags her finger at the rest of us for our too-big carbon footprints and crusades for massive taxes and regulation to reduce global warming. Then there’s the Bay Area hypocrisy of the woman who represents one of the most anti-military areas of the country soaking up military resources to shuttle her (and her many family members) across the country almost every weekend.

Remember: Pelosi’s San Francisco is notorious for banning the Marines’ Silent Drill Platoon from filming a recruitment commercial on its streets; killing the JROTC program in the public schools; blocking the retired battleship U.S.S. Iowa from docking in its waters; and attacking the Navy’s Blue Angels – which left-wing activists have tried to banish from northern California skies for the past two years.

Apparently, those anti-war protesters have no problem with evil military jets currying Pelosi and her massive entourages to the funerals of the late Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones and Charlie Norwood; foreign junkets to Rome; and politicized stops to Iowa flood sites to bash the Bush administration. One exasperated Department of Defense official, besieged with itinerary changes and shuttle requests back and forth between San Francisco Airport to Andrews Air Force Base for Pelosi, her daughter, son-in-law, and grandchild, wrote in an e-mail:

“They have a history of canceling many of their past requests. Any chance of politely querying [Pelosi’s team] if they really intend to do all of these or are they just picking every weekend?…[T]here’s no need to block every weekend ‘just in case’…”

Another official pointed out the “hidden costs” associated with the speaker’s last minute changes and cancellations. “We have…folks prepping the jets and crews driving in (not a short drive for some), cooking meals and preflighting the jets etc.” Upset that a specific type of aircraft was not available to her boss, a Pelosi staffer carped to the DoD coordinators: “This is not good news, and we will have some very disappointed folks, as well as a very upset [s]peaker.”

Three months ago, turmoil erupted over Queen Nancy’s demand for the military to reposition her plane to fly out of Travis Air Force Base in Fairfield, Calif., closer to where she had “business,” instead of San Francisco Airport/SFO (1.5 hours away). A special air missions official wrote: “We have never done this in the past. The deal is…that the Speaker shuttle is from DC to SFO and back. We will not reposition. We do not reposition for convenience even for the SECDEF. It is not [too] far of a drive from Travis to SFO. Did the escort suggest to the Speaker that this is ok? If so, I hope you guys correct them immediately. If you agree with me that I am correct, then you need to stay strong and present the facts to the Speaker’s office.”

Another official stated bluntly: “We can’t reposition the airplane such a short distance. It is not a judicial use of the asset. It is too expensive to operate the jet when there is truly no need to do so.”

A beleaguered colleague responded: “[Y]ou know I understand and feel with you…but, this is a battle we are bound to lose if we tell the speaker office. In the end, this is what will happen…I wish that I could say this is a one-time request, but we know it will probably happen again in the future.”

In the end, the military won that battle. But a few days later, Pelosi was back with a new demand: that her military plane taking her from DC to San Francisco make a stop in New Jersey to bring her and three Democrats to an “innovation Forum” at Princeton University involving 21 participants and no audience. A Gulfstream jet was secured for the important “official business.”

No word on whether Pelosi required vanilla-scented candles, Evian water, and fresh white lilies aboard the flight. But rest assured: Air Diva traveled in style, courtesy of your tax dollars and the forbearance of the U.S. military.

By S.J. Morgan on 03/11/2009 11:12 am