Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 05/12/2009 11:00 pm

Obama's Notre Dame Commencement Speech: What Would Father Hesburgh Do?

Amid graduation, abortion and Satan controversy, Margo Howard misses the Notre Dame days of former President Theodore Hesburgh.

Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Margo’s advice column, Dear Margo, appears twice a week — on Thursdays and Fridays — on wowOwow.com.

I suspect by now everyone knows there’s a big whoop about Notre Dame having invited President Obama to be their commencement speaker. The anti-abortion people feel that because Obama is pro-choice, he should not be honored by a Catholic University. I must say that when this mess got started I wanted to holler, "But he’s the president!  What kind of crazy litmus tests do you people want to saddle yourselves with? Must every speaker share all your religious views?" And when I thought that Notre Dame’s eye could get no blacker, I read in The New York Times that a Bishop Robert W. Finn, bishop of the Kansas City-St. Joseph Diocese in Missouri, told an anti-abortion convention, “We are at war! We are engaged in a constant warfare with Satan.”

I mean no disrespect to those who take the Bible literally, but Satan?

By now – the 21st century – Satan, to me, is like a character in a play or a puppet show; a metaphor for bad and evil things. It is hard to imagine a senior prelate of a major religion actually saying with a straight face that “we are engaged in a constant warfare with Satan,” as though he were a person running an organization, if you will, that stands for everything the Catholics don’t.

I think many people know by now that I identify as Jewish, though my actual beliefs fall somewhere between humanism, agnosticism and atheism. I accept as true that there is evil in life, but it is hard for me to believe that educated people see him dressed in a red suit and toting a pitchfork. I am pretty sure I will make zero friends with this little essay, but that will be nothing new for me. I remember when I wrote for slate.com as “Dear Prudence” that I had a letter asking me a religious question. When I answered that more wars were fought and lives lost over the question of who had the better imaginary friend, the server crashed.

In any case, I think what troubles me most is that I have very fond feelings for Notre Dame – or had – because the Notre Dame I knew was headed by Father Theodore Hesburgh, one of the great men of all time.

I can’t prove it, but I doubt that he ever invoked Satan to show his displeasure about a commencement speaker. “Our Lady,” indeed, needs to show a little more grace and tolerance.

259 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

starry Nite

This issue makes no sense.  The far right seems to be busy protesting all aspects of our private lives.

The President of the United States should be acceptable at any venue.

By starry Nite on 05/13/2009 12:24 am
Kelly In Texas

Like it or not, we as Americans still have, for the time being, PRIVATE businesses, companies, Universities. The President is only welcomed where he is invited. Not at ANY venue and not in my home.

For those who do not support Obama policies they have every right to protest whatever it is that they do not agree with.

For those that do not support abortion, it is a very concerning situation. Sweden has now approved abortion based on the GENDER of the baby. If the GENDER is not what you wanted…then just abort it. Just what gender do you women think are aborted the most? Take one guess girls….

This issue makes plenty of sense. I suggest that when one chooses a University, that they read and understand what that insitution is based on and what it is that they support…that way…you can go ELSE WHERE.

All aspects of your personal lives? Hardly.

By Kelly In Texas on 05/14/2009 1:39 pm
Ann-Marie Bergstrom

I just want to point out that it is incorrect to say that "Sweden has now approved abortion based on the GENDER of the baby."

Abortion in Sweden is allowed without having to give a reason up until week 18 (over 90% are done before week 12). No one has to tell anyone why they want to have an abortion. So it is difficult to forbid gender-based abortions since it is impossible to know the reason unless the woman voluntarily gives that information.

The way forward suggested in the Swedish health care is to stop give information about the gender of the baby before week 18.

By Ann-Marie Bergstrom on 05/15/2009 6:09 am
Mahulda Fite
Ann-Marie, As I understand it, wasn’t that what this was about? Didn’t this all start because a woman who was less than 18 weeks had amniocentisis and found out the sex of her unborn child and decide she didn’t want a girl because she already had 2 girls? I think she had the amnio for other reasons, but asked what the child’s sex was and it was the doctors who were perplexed as to what to do in this situation. I thought that that was exactly what the courts ultimately decided that this was indeed acceptable—to abort based on gender—at any time. Please correct me if I am wrong.
By Mahulda Fite on 05/15/2009 6:18 am
Ann-Marie Bergstrom

Yes, you are right. As long as Sweden has had free abortion it has been allowed to abort for any reason as long as it is within the time limit. So there is absolutely no change to the abortion policy of Sweden. There might have been similar cases before without anyone knowing….  because it is not necessary to state a reason for the abortion.  What has changed is the medical possibility to know the gender early enough to allow an abortion if wanted.

I am not familiar with the abortion regulations of US. Is it necessary to give a reason? And in that case, what reasons are acceptable? Who decides if the reason given is acceptable or not?

By Ann-Marie Bergstrom on 05/15/2009 8:20 am
Kelly In Texas
You can frame it anyway that suits you Ann-Marie….the fact is that it is being done.
By Kelly In Texas on 05/15/2009 5:14 pm
Laura Ward
Exactly, the president should be respected and our country was founded on religious freedom.
By Laura Ward on 05/13/2009 12:31 am
Margie Goforth
I don’t think the issue here is the president’s position on abortion; it is about the fact that a catholic university is honoring him (with an honorary law degree) despite his position on abortion.  That is what bothers me the most.  You can respect a man without honoring him.  As for Satan, while I don’t believe he runs around in a red suit and pitchfork, I definately believe he exists.  I believe God exists and sometimes see Christ in people around me; I believe Satan exists and sometimes see him in people around me, as well.
By Margie Goforth on 05/13/2009 1:05 am
Mia Poehlmann
Amen Margie! Thank you!
By Mia Poehlmann on 05/13/2009 10:57 am
 Joy Foster
Margie, I have to agree with you on this: I see true goodness in some people, while others exude pure evil.
By Joy Foster on 05/13/2009 7:11 pm
immoddesta godessa
right!   and the whole dust up over the Presidents address is?    The fact that the stumblebum Bush never received any such scrutiny when asked to give any sort of commemorative address is the conflict that I respond to!  I guess those phenatics opposing the secular presidents words would rather lynch the guy than listen to human opinion!
By immoddesta godessa on 05/13/2009 10:39 pm
Mary Utrup
God Bless Margie!! You got it nailed down tight!! I have a really hard time "honnoring" a man, in power, who uses that power to legitimze killling children. Abortion kills children, it’s as simple as that. I doubt Mr. Obama would sit idly by if someone threatened his two daughters. It makes me sick at heart that a University that is so highly recognized as CATHOLIC would stoop to allowing any serious recognition of Mr. Obama. It makes it appear that Catholics have changed their minds on abortion. I know at least one who has not and will not. The facts speak for themselves: nine months pregnant produces at least one child.
By Mary Utrup on 05/14/2009 8:10 am
macwoof woof
Yeah, well we have Prejean now saying that satan was trying to tempt her during the pageant. Am wondering if God thinks implants and parading around naked fits with the image s/he wants from his spokespeople? Maybe God is looking for some young male converts.  I am with you Margo, but we have some folk out there who think they should be dictating how everyone else should live. oy veh!
By macwoof woof on 05/13/2009 1:06 am
Blu Stephens
Wow.  All I can say is that I’ve loved your column for a long time… I’ve been a reader ever since you were Prudence.  And this… I would hug you for.  Thank you.
By Blu Stephens on 05/13/2009 1:09 am
Lizzie R.
You said this so well, and I couldn’t agree with your more. This mixing of religion with politics is going just too far…one has nothing to do with the other. Of course, your comment will evoke so many hostile replies, but that is to be expected when this subject comes up. Thank you for saying so succinctly what a lot have been thinking. I will now enter the enemies’ corner with the rest of you like thinkers and wait to get pummelled for my opinion
By Lizzie R. on 05/13/2009 1:14 am