A Friend Stopped By | 05/12/2009 11:00 pm
Obama's Notre Dame Commencement Speech: What Would Father Hesburgh Do?

Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Margo’s advice column, Dear Margo, appears twice a week — on Thursdays and Fridays — on wowOwow.com.
I suspect by now everyone knows there’s a big whoop about Notre Dame having invited President Obama to be their commencement speaker. The anti-abortion people feel that because Obama is pro-choice, he should not be honored by a Catholic University. I must say that when this mess got started I wanted to holler, "But he’s the president! What kind of crazy litmus tests do you people want to saddle yourselves with? Must every speaker share all your religious views?" And when I thought that Notre Dame’s eye could get no blacker, I read in The New York Times that a Bishop Robert W. Finn, bishop of the Kansas City-St. Joseph Diocese in Missouri, told an anti-abortion convention, “We are at war! We are engaged in a constant warfare with Satan.”
I mean no disrespect to those who take the Bible literally, but Satan?
By now – the 21st century – Satan, to me, is like a character in a play or a puppet show; a metaphor for bad and evil things. It is hard to imagine a senior prelate of a major religion actually saying with a straight face that “we are engaged in a constant warfare with Satan,” as though he were a person running an organization, if you will, that stands for everything the Catholics don’t.
I think many people know by now that I identify as Jewish, though my actual beliefs fall somewhere between humanism, agnosticism and atheism. I accept as true that there is evil in life, but it is hard for me to believe that educated people see him dressed in a red suit and toting a pitchfork. I am pretty sure I will make zero friends with this little essay, but that will be nothing new for me. I remember when I wrote for slate.com as “Dear Prudence” that I had a letter asking me a religious question. When I answered that more wars were fought and lives lost over the question of who had the better imaginary friend, the server crashed.
In any case, I think what troubles me most is that I have very fond feelings for Notre Dame – or had – because the Notre Dame I knew was headed by Father Theodore Hesburgh, one of the great men of all time.
I can’t prove it, but I doubt that he ever invoked Satan to show his displeasure about a commencement speaker. “Our Lady,” indeed, needs to show a little more grace and tolerance.
























259 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
This issue makes no sense. The far right seems to be busy protesting all aspects of our private lives.
The President of the United States should be acceptable at any venue.
Like it or not, we as Americans still have, for the time being, PRIVATE businesses, companies, Universities. The President is only welcomed where he is invited. Not at ANY venue and not in my home.
For those who do not support Obama policies they have every right to protest whatever it is that they do not agree with.
For those that do not support abortion, it is a very concerning situation. Sweden has now approved abortion based on the GENDER of the baby. If the GENDER is not what you wanted…then just abort it. Just what gender do you women think are aborted the most? Take one guess girls….
This issue makes plenty of sense. I suggest that when one chooses a University, that they read and understand what that insitution is based on and what it is that they support…that way…you can go ELSE WHERE.
All aspects of your personal lives? Hardly.
I just want to point out that it is incorrect to say that "Sweden has now approved abortion based on the GENDER of the baby."
Abortion in Sweden is allowed without having to give a reason up until week 18 (over 90% are done before week 12). No one has to tell anyone why they want to have an abortion. So it is difficult to forbid gender-based abortions since it is impossible to know the reason unless the woman voluntarily gives that information.
The way forward suggested in the Swedish health care is to stop give information about the gender of the baby before week 18.
Yes, you are right. As long as Sweden has had free abortion it has been allowed to abort for any reason as long as it is within the time limit. So there is absolutely no change to the abortion policy of Sweden. There might have been similar cases before without anyone knowing…. because it is not necessary to state a reason for the abortion. What has changed is the medical possibility to know the gender early enough to allow an abortion if wanted.
I am not familiar with the abortion regulations of US. Is it necessary to give a reason? And in that case, what reasons are acceptable? Who decides if the reason given is acceptable or not?