Wall Street Weekly | 11/13/2009 12:45 pm
Obama in a Box of His Own Making, by Liz Peek

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 11/9)
Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist.
Finally, finally, the Obama administration is proposing using TARP money to bail out a truly needy entity – the federal government. That’s right. Reacting to voter unease over rising deficits, the whiz kids at Treasury have decided to use some of the $210 billion remaining in the $700 billion emergency financial fund to prop up Uncle Sam.
Of course, this move will be just a drop in the $1.4 trillion deficit bucket. It is also not the only idea under consideration by a rattled administration. They will also consider – guess what? – raising taxes. They expect to issue plans to "simplify" the tax code by December 5; for those who have just landed in the U.S., that’s code for higher rates.
The bad news is the government’s ability to raise taxes is being severely compromised by the need to fund Obamacare. The administration and Democrats in Congress have put themselves in a tight box, bound up in strands of costly and unpopular legislation. By undertaking to expand federal health coverage in the midst of a truly harrowing recession, Obama and his pals in Congress have spent great political capital – and have lost important financial flexibility.
The health-care bills proposed in both the House and the Senate raise taxes on high earners and small businesses – thus limiting the potential use of those tax options for other needs – and even so the legislation will boost the budget deficits. Americans are increasingly aware that the pretense of deficit neutrality trumpeted by the bills’ creators comes from the ruse of including outlays for fewer years than receipts and by assuming cuts in doctor reimbursements that will never take place.
Such is the panic over paying for this sweeping overhaul that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has apparently secretly plotted to raise the Medicare payroll tax on high earners – which would be in addition to a $460 billion surtax on that group’s income, including a 69% jump in capital gains taxes. More on this later.
The wrangling over health care has not only darkened the country’s mood at a particularly fragile point, it has distracted our leaders from what should have been the No. 1 concern all along – job creation. Now that the unemployment numbers have become front-page news, and polls show Americans souring on the administration’s economic management, Obama is convening a "jobs summit" at which, he says, he will be open to any and all new ideas.
I doubt that. One of the best ideas would be to abandon the push for massive health-care reform, and that is something the administration and the Democrats in Congress can not do. Simply put, President Obama absolutely must pass a health-care bill, or he will be so weakened that he will be out of office in short order. The desperation for success was underlined by this week’s visit to Capitol Hill by Former President Bill Clinton, who pressed Democrats to pass a bill by arguing that "It’s not important to be perfect here." No, but it should not be the ghastly mess that it is. Imagine undermining abortion rights in an effort to ram through health-care reform.
The damage that will be done to our economy from this single piece of legislation is incalculable. As stated, the bills both include sharp hikes in taxes that would fall on high earners and small businesses, which will certainly dampen hiring by that group. But the point is not that the wealthy can’t manage to pay more taxes. More important is that these increases sap potential revenues from other agencies and programs, as well as state and local governments, which are also fiscally strapped. Whatever capacity we have for increased tax revenues should most definitely not be going to fund health-care reform at this juncture.
























252 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Well Liz, apparently some citizens haven’t received the memo about the facts as you have stated so well. I guess that I could forgive them, considering the lame stream media is feeding them falsehoods straight from the White House. But no, there are too many sourse that are now revealing the facts, as are you.
About that "box’ that Obama has gotten himself into…someone please punch some air holes in it for him….the lack of oxygen is getting to him. He is under the delusion that Americans do not see that he has bought off Congress and has threatened those that call him out.
We do. Most of us anyway. His poll numbers reflect that big time.
Those that hang on to the illusions of the Obama lollipop land should be considered treasonous, if not flat out indoctrinated.
why attack the person instead of the idea!?!?!?it’s now your turn to offer your ideas for progress and facts????
Ah Shakespear.."you protestith too much" look it up.
Dr. hoodia
Why? Obviously because the man puts himself forward as the idea. Narcissist you know, they can’t help themselves.
I have posted my ideas in plenty of posts, fiscal and personal responsibility. Less government, lower taxes, free market captialism.
And ah "Dr. Hoodia" I don’t have to look it up, Shakespear was required reading in 8th grade. YOU however,may want to look it up before you misquote Shakespeare (yes with an "e’) in the future…
From Hamlet,(Act 3 Scene 2) "The lady doth protest too much, me thinks" Goodness you did butcher that one.
Now my advice to you is; "The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool"
dear true grit..i stand corrected!..my ole brain is a little worn out and i misquoted to filth..sorry ..I think you are one of the best common sense bloggers on this site!..I was aiming my comment to belinda..who attacks people personally without getting to the real issues ..I was trying to use our time on this site to get some constructive ideas.Yea we got some wignuts here and i hope i am not one of those in your eyes.I have agreed with you from the getgo. I have been to tea parties and have talked to a lot of senior here in fl….they all agree….with you and me! I also spent a lot of time in saudi arabia with the royal family and they really do think we are simpletons.
well, forgive me grit..keep the common sense coming!
Dr Hoodia.
your in
Dr. Hoodia, it is so hard to figure out the responses sometimes! You are correct, there are many who just attack the messenger here…so as you posted, some suggestions would be welcomed.
Thanks for the reply. Like you, I get tired of those that defend the man, while giving his socialized agenda a free pass.
How sad that the majority of Americans, that do not support these "changes" have been silent for so long. No wonder those in other contries think us "simpletons", when they read the liberal opinions from Hollywood and the lame stream media. Now the liberals are all in shock that the rest of America does not agree with their ideology.
However, we are speaking out now and the polls are reflecting that. Average Americans are not going to go along quietly any more. For it really is up to them to stop this train wreck that is the Obama agenda.
Thanks again.
" The administration and Democrats in Congress have put themselves in a tight box, bound up in strands of costly and unpopular legislation. By undertaking to expand federal health coverage in the midst of a truly harrowing recession, Obama and his pals in Congress have spent great political capital – and have lost important financial flexibility." so says Liz Peek:
Evidently Peek doesn’t realize the complexities of this "unpopular legislation" since she has lumped all Democrats together. The fact is that the Democratic blue-dog congressional party has become far more ideologically diverse than the Republican one. It means that Democrats can’t simply act with the kind of unanimity one sees among Republicans. There is too much disagreement within the caucus. And what Peek doesn’t seem to understand is that when thousands of people are suffering because of poor health care––can’t afford the premiums, etc., this all connects to joblessness and devastation. It would be great if we already had decent health care for ALL, and could concentrate on the myriad other problems, but we don’t. Obama and "his pals" are trying to get this health care reform up and running in spite of all the road blocks that get in the way. And part of those road blocks have to do with aforementioned Blue Dogs. Their resistance, for instance to the public option, had at its core a contradiction. Their great concern is cost containment, but the robust public option delivers just that. The Blue Dog group, for the most part, tends to represent districts that are poorer, where more people could really benefit from a public option. So––here’s a case where concerns have frankly come across as less substantive than political or electoral. When a President is up against these kinds of inhibiting factors in his own party–––AND this is only on health care, then what is lost is not so much political capital as Representatives that are honest brokers.
That, Phyll, is why I think Hillary Clinton would’ve been the better choice for Prez. Less political rhetoric from all concerned, although one wonders how much less. Nowadays, all presidents are labeled as buffoons. Reagan was probably the last one that seemed to retain widespread support. Of course, he had his detractors, to be sure. But anymore, it just seems like no matter who gets that job in the Oval Office, they’re torn to shreds.
I think most of it has to do with the ubiquitous media outlets. The 24/7 cable networks, Internet blog pages…they’ve got to fill the void with something to out-do their competitors. And controversy sells.
The in-fighting within both the Republican and Democratic parties is something to behold. It’s a safe bet to say that everyone hates everyone.
James,
I think all of those factors come into play. I believe the president is trying to fix a very broken machine in a way that many believe will eventually break it more. I think he is one of the most hardworking disciplined man I have ever seen. He has many attributes that are important for this office, but he has never governed before and I think he relies on others too much. Maybe that is the name of the game in the 21st century.
Wouldn’t it also have to do with the fact that it is rare that any legislation is really deficit neutral? How can they raise taxes when so many are hurting? I don’t get that. How come political motives come before what the country needs? Why didn’t they hit job creation right out of the gate? It doesn’t make any sense. Yes, everyone notes that our healthcare costs are higher than any other nation, but we have a higher survival rate in many life threatening diseases. More than half of our health care costs are medicare and it has been estimated that somewhere between 54 billion and 90 billion bucks of that is medicare fraud - which has been going on for years, as well as reported for years, and the government didn’t do anything about it. Congress didn’t do anything about it. Crazy.
They say they are going to save $90 billion in medicare per year — that is the fraud they think they are going to clean up. Let’s seem them clean it up first. I think think if they had gone in and focused as much energy on job creation as on healthcare, got a few wins under their belts that the whole nation could be satisfied with, the nation might be open to some of this plan. As it stands, there is some very good legislation in it, but it is overshadowed by the huge bureaucracy it will create. In my business I have to deal with several of them throughout any given month, and I tell you that when I get on the phone I pray that whomever answers has a slight inkling as to how to help me.