White House Media Circuit | 03/30/2009 11:30 am
Obama Officials Plead Case on TV (Videos)

The White House administration took to the Sunday morning news shows to plead their policy cases this weekend.
While President Barack Obama was on CBS’s "Face the Nation," Timothy Geithner appeared on ABC’s "This Week" and U.S. special envoy Richard Holbrooke with Gen. David Petraeus spoke on CNN’s "State of the Union." As leading figures in Washington unveil crucial plans concerning U.S. relations with Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as how the government will save America’s crumbling economy, the Obama administration apparently prides itself on keeping an "open government" by working the media circuit.
In case you missed any of these segments, wowOwow highlights below the important speaking points from all three shows.
Obama on "Face the Nation":
President Obama, who called himself a "student of history" on Sunday to Bob Schieffer, said that his plans in Pakistan and Afghanistan include the introduction of social programs that will help citizens thrive and eventually become U.S. allies. He also spoke about the introduction of agricultural and other specialists to help upgrade farming, schools and infrastructure as being crucial to gaining widespread support in a nation still riddled with anti-American extremism. A similar commitment in rural Iraq is starting to create pro-American sentiment in its countryside. As the president said to Schieffer, it is not all about the number of combat forces on the ground.
Obama’s War Plan Doesn’t Rely on Bullets or Bombs
President Obama: No. Our plan does not change the recognition of Pakistan as a sovereign government. We need to work with them and through them to deal with al-Qaeda. But we have to hold them much more accountable. And we have to recognize that part of our task in working with Pakistan is not just military. It’s also our capacity to build their capacity through civilian interventions, through development, through aid assistance. And that’s part of what you’re seeing — both in Afghanistan and Pakistan, I think, is fully resourcing a comprehensive strategy that doesn’t just rely on bullets or bombs but also relies on agricultural specialists on doctors, on engineers, to help create an environment in which people recognize that they have much more at stake in partnering with us and the international community than giving into some of these —
Schieffer: Are you concerned at all? Because some people say the more troops you put in is just gonna inflame the situation. It’s gonna make it worse. What do you say to them?























159 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
The bully pulpit is sweet, but the Dems have to convince their own, the Republicans are already against this outrageous spending and debt. They’re not moving. How many Dems in Congress are wavering, that is the question. How many Dems in Congress are up for re-election?
I think we’ll see a lot of badly twisted arms in the future.
Marjorie, this should help prove your point:
"Elections to the United States Senate will be held on November 2, 2010, with at least 36 of the 100 seats in the U.S. Senate being contested. Thirty-four of these are to six-year terms, from January 3, 2011 to January 3, 2017." "The Senate is currently composed of 56 Democrats, 41 Republicans, and two Independents-Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and Bernie Sanders of Vermont, both of whom caucus with the Democrats-and one outstanding seat in Minnesota. Of the seats expected to be up for election in 2010, 19 are held by Republicans and 17 by Democrats." Here is the list - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_elections,_2010 I would like to invite all of my fellow ireporters in assisting me in checking out all of the incumbants who plan to run for re-election in 2010…there are many stories out there I am sure need to be told. How many on this list do we even want back? This is just the Senators…I will post another list for the House Of Representatives.
http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-231392
There are two that are especially hard to predict this early: Bond (R-MO), whom I listed as at risk, and Burr (R-NC) who I listed as safe. Missouri always tends to be close. Burr is one of the biggest dumbasses in the Senate — maybe next to Bunning — and North Carolina is going through a remarkable transformation. It is still the 10th largest state, as it has been for decades, but it has grown in population so that it is now bigger than New Jersey, with most of the influx coming from the Mid-Atlantic states, which explains, in part, Obama’s taking the state and Liddy Dole’s loss. Still, given the off-year election, Burr will probably pull it out, so I’m saying NC and MO are a wash in terms of flip/no flip.
Likely to flip:
Voinivich (R-OH) (retiring)
Risk of flipping:
Bond (R-MO) (retiring)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burris (D-IL)
Dodd (D-CN)
Gregg (R-NH)
Lincoln (D-AK)
Martinez (R-FL) (retiring)
Specter (R-PA)
Vitter (R-LA)
Safe Seats:
Bayh (D-IN)
M. Bennet (D-CO)
B. Bennet (R-UT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brownback (R-KS) (retiring)
Burr (R-NC)
Coburn (R-OK)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Feingold (D-WI)
Gillibrand (D-NY) May lose primary but seat is safe
Grassley (R-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Isakson (R-GA)
Kaufman (D-DE) (retiring)
Leahy (D-VT)
McCain (R-AZ)
Mikluski (D-MD)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murray (D-WA)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shelby (R-AL)
Reid (D-NV)
Wyden (D-OR)
Thune (R-SD)
Key point everyone misses—-so easy to focus only on money, money, money—is the shift is idealogy from FREEDOM as espoused in the US Constituion to nationalization/socialism & government as Daddy. Let the companies, it’s better than govt. stooge telling the CEO to quit or else. HHmm, sounds so like Hitler.
Libra: …do it on the tax payer’s dime…
I don’t know how much longer we can afford to have Obama as president. There is a reason O’Reilly and Fox News is growing in leaps and bounds, every Independant and Republican is gathering together.
You’re right, the campaigning never stops… and the presiding is left to the aides… but there is a saturation point. Obama might be preaching to the choir. He has to change the minds of those listening to Fox News, and I don’t think he can do it.
Marjorie…that’s why many dems want the "fairness doctrine" to come into play….got to shut Rush, Bill, Sean, Laura, Ann, Glenn and whoever else speaks negative towards obama!!!
Libra: "fairness doctrine"
As far as TV is concerned, the Libs have more outlets than do the Conservatives. Actually, a good Conservative forum on ABC and the other network (nitwit) stations might boost their ratings. Right now, everyone but the Libs turn to FOX.
The radio is a bit different since it’s dominated by Conservative Talk Radio. Obama will have to get more powerful (and he might) to squash Talk Radio. IMHO.