Question of the Day | 03/16/2009 11:00 pm
Are you willing to accept more gov't regulation and fewer choices in health care to cut costs and provide insurance for all?

269 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

I will also be in the minority here. I do not trust the government to provide equal care to all citizens. I also do not trust the government to manage health care without at least 25% of the money being lost to graft and crime. Just for the record, I pay the full premium for my own health care….about $9,000 a year.
As for fewer choices, does that mean having a mammogram every two years instead of annually? Should a rectal scan be prescribed for adults at age 55 instead of the current age of 50? The cost of the ICU facilities are very high …. should the ICU beds be available for only patients who are under age 85? That question about fewer choices is darn scary so I think I would say no to that also.
Bonnie, Nothing I have heard or read is suggesting that the government is going to provide care to all citizens. The Obama plan, actually just a blueprint, calls for a public/private initiative. You will never be able to get rid of the insurance companies, which would have to happen with a Govt. run program. What I hear him saying is to establish a kind of "best practices" panel which would gather information from around the country to actually decide WHAT works best, instead of every state and insurance Co making the decision, it can cut out worthless procedures, duplicated tests and wasted hospital time, AND maybe save some money. If you read his speech, which I linked at the beginning, you’d get a better idea than I can relate.
We just can’t go on as it is !!!

EKA - I will go back to the link you mentioned. However, I did listen to President Obama when he was a candidate talk about his plan to revamp the health care system. According to his plan at that time, I would be eligible to receive a $2,500 credit …straight off the income tax. Yet, he never once indicated the cost of his package or how he planned for the government to afford his plan.
Medicare is already a partnership between the government and the private sector. Is it working? I believe so. However, the Medicare program along with the Social Security program are both due (actually they are overdue) for serious updates inasmuch as they will soon cost more than the government receives from the income tax rolls. And that means a cutback on benefits… the age to retire will be raised while at the same time individual cost for Medicare will increase. The primary reason why Congress has refused to act, is that they fear for their successful reelection. It was during the Reagan presidency when the last social security adjustment was made and the Republicans paid a price because the Dems went after them hammer and tong during the next elections even though they knew the program had to be updated. The changes can only be attempted when there is a strong President in office who can take the heat from the irate seniors.
I don’t know EKA. I will read the link to see if President Obama’s new proposal is different than what he favored last summer.
I know women who go without mammograms because they don’t have insurance, or their insurance is so bad they don’t want to find anything before they can get a better policy if they get a new job, etc. As it is now we pay more money per person for less care under this top heavy private system where something like $35 for every $100 goes toward administrative costs. We have Insurance companies dictating to patients and doctors what sort of treatment is allowed and these are the "lucky" folks who have insurance… what about the millions without? What about the millions who are so under-insured they can’t go to a doctor unless they have a catastrophic illness? I know a couple, both working, WITH insurance… husband is diabetic and one son is autistic, and they went bankrupt due to medical expenses. This is WITH insurance.
I know many people in Ireland, and my best friend is a nurse who moved from the US 20 years ago to Canada and has lived and worked in their system that long and none of them would trade the care or peace of mind they have with their systems, with the American health industry.
and yes, we need to revise our current health care system—but, socializing is not the answer
you can’t just lump everything together—though most of them would be run more efficiently if they were privately owned
…ever heard of going postal?

6 Comments

























