Wall Street Weekly | 07/24/2009 2:15 pm
Obama Slump Boosts Market, by Liz Peek

© AP
Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 7/20)
Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.
Has Obama’s slump in the polls boosted stock prices? The earth shook in Washington this past week as the administration’s push to enact health-care changes received a massive thumping from voters. Notwithstanding nonstop multiday hectoring from President Obama, polls indicate slipping support for his agenda, causing even his own party to slam on the brakes.To my mind, the sudden drop in enthusiasm for the president (his approval ratings are now below Bush’s at the same time in his presidency – a shocker, right?) means some tempering of his legislative free-for-all. For investors, the setbacks suggest a timeout from the endless stream of anti-business initiatives flowing from the Obama White House.
There has been serious (and in my view reasonable) alarm over the administration’s inclination to meddle with a wide swath of industry. The cap and trade bill, the financial regulatory overhaul, the upending of corporate tax law, the new consumer protection agency, the takeover of the autos – these are just some of the proposals the Obama team have spun out in recent months – creating uncertainty and anxiety while the country sank into a recession. Only a few days ago there was talk of a second stimulus bill, a prospect that scared the pants off inflation and deficit hawks. With Rasmussen reporting that only 25% of Americans believe that the stimulus bill passed earlier this year has been effective, I think we can assign that particular notion to the meat locker.
It is true that there are other reasons for the market’s delightful 38% rally in the Dow that we’ve seen since March and the astonishing 11% jump over the past eight days. Without a doubt the collapse in housing markets has stabilized, and job losses appear to be mitigating. Existing home sales were up 3.6% in June to an eight-month high, reducing inventories of unsold units to 8.9 months, the lowest so far this year. Meanwhile, the four-week moving average of unemployment claims dropped to 566,000 in the latest period, down from the peak of 659,000 in April. A decline of this magnitude has in the past confirmed the end of a recession.
Moreover, second-quarter profits exceeded expectations for about 75% of those companies reporting so far. Reports out have beaten both analysts’ forecasts and in many cases the firms’ own projections, leading to a boost in estimates for the balance of the year. Normally some 60% of companies report better-than-expected results, since corporations know that coming in shy of projections is the quickest route to the doghouse. These surprises, though, seem genuine. When companies presented their outlooks around the beginning of the year, it looked like the U.S. was heading into a depression. Visibility was poor, to say the least.
Though all these factors have boosted the stock market, there remains enormous uncertainty, much of it tied to government policy. It has been decades since the government of the United States has appeared so anti-business, and decades since the need to support business has been so vital. We need people to be put back to work and while job losses may be slowing, companies are still loathe to add to payrolls. Increases in second-quarter profits came primarily from cost-cutting, including layoffs. Consequently, productivity rose to an impressive 3.8%. Revenue growth was weak at best.
Only the government is hiring. Ultimately, government spending can only provide a modest and temporary boost to the nation’s economy since it is coupled to rising deficits. At some point, paying back those deficits requires higher incomes and tax revenues from the private sector.
Read more about: Approval Ratings, Barack Obama, Economy, George Bush, Health-Care Reform, Liz Peek, Money, News, Obama Administration, Paula Danziger, Recession, Stimulus Bill, U.S., Wall Street Weekly























429 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Damn Obama and his recession and war! We had eaight years of peace under George Bush and a stock market that showed nothing but great returns! Why did we ever vote the GOP out in the first place?
PS: I thought the market was doing well because of all the rain the North East has had. Or the eclipse.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, Rush, my dahling. Mommy has sorely missed you, my dear.
I am never certain whether it is your tongue - or that nasty cigar - planted so firmly in your cheek, dahling.
Hey Rush L………….
Tell all the mothers, fathers, wives, husbands and children how we had 8 years of Peace under George Bush.
I think when they go to visit the graves of their loved ones who lost their lives during that 8 year period of (YOUR BULL SH*T PEACE) would differ with you………not even to mention the tens of thousands of Iraq’s who died.
What a Peace………….Are you insane or just NUTS.
If you think you’re funny about a subject of dead American soldiers you’re sadly mistaken.
Liz — You always hit the nail on the head. "Before they hire workers employee managers have to believe that end demand will rise".
Right now there are many of us in that position. Small business is waiting to see just how much more do we pay and how soon. And uncertainty is in full bloom out here. We have nothing left to invest. We have taken our investments out just to keep our businesses afloat. Regulations and taxes, both on the Federal level and the State level has our heads swimming. Would we love to bring back the employees we’ve had to let go. Yes, but, at the present time, it’s absolutely impossible. We have cut to the bone. Do we want to borrow more money? No. Just can’t afford it.
And we in small business are affected by the lack of spending, not only by our vendors but also by consumers. Also, there are many people with small businesses in our area who are in dismay about the possibility of a wage increase at this time. There is just too much being thrown out there at once. The small business owner and the consumer is digging their heels in and saying - No! And Enough!
Yes, there will be a small rise in input in the 3rd quarter because, as you say, inventories will need to be restocked. However, as I stated, I believe the increase will be small. There will not be a full restock. It will be what can be afforded. We will be restocking at half the amount. I don’t know about the American consumers in general but I do know it will be quite a while before we, in the business world, recover from the drubbing we have experienced.
Christmas — not even thinking that far ahead this year. Too much on our plate NOW!
Again, thanks for your "telling it like it really is"!
By Jared Allen, Mike Soraghan and Lauren Burke
Posted: 07/24/09 03:27 PM [ET]House healthcare negotiations dissolved in acrimony on Friday, with Blue Dog Democrats saying they were “lied” to by their Democratic leaders.
In advance of a subsequent press conference called by House leadership, Blue Dog liaison Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D-Calif.) said the healthcare bill should be staying in committee.
"I expect the committee process to proceed," Cardoza said.
The seven Blue Dogs on the Energy and Commerce Committee stormed out of a Friday meeting with their committee chairman, Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), saying Waxman had been negotiating in bad faith over a number of provisions Blue Dogs demanded be changed in the stalled healthcare bill.
“I’ve been lied to,” Blue Dog Coalition Co-Chairman Charlie Melancon (D-La.) said on Friday. “We have not had legitimate negotiations.“Mr. Waxman has decided to sever discussions with the Blue Dogs who are trying to make this bill work for America,” Melancon said.
Although those Blue Dogs were supposed to be headed back into another meeting of the Energy and Commerce Democrats, their anger was visible.
If the two sides cannot reach an agreement, the only hope for passage of the bill in the House will be to go straight to the floor, an option leaders shied away from endorsing but said was an option.
But the Blue Dogs issued dire warnings to leaders contemplating that approach.
"Waxman simply does not have votes in committee and process should not be bypassed to bring the bill straight to floor,” Rep. Mike Ross (D-Ark.), the lead Blue Dog negotiator, said on Friday. “We are trying to save this bill and trying to save this party.”
Melancon said there would be 40-45 “solid no” votes from the 52-strong Blue Dogs, among other problems throughout the caucus. And Melancon said there are more Democrats who will vote against the bill.
“If they try to bring it to the floor, I think they’ll find out they have more problems than the Blue Dogs.”
A leadership aide said no decisions have been made on how to proceed.
This story was updated at 4:20 p.m.
Libra, the Blue Dogs are in between a rock and a hard place. That coalition so far has received about 1.6 million for 2010 elections… most of that money from insurance, medicals, and pharm groups. That money continues to pour in which delights them. But, the BDs are also aware that many are from states with swing voters. Come election time, that will be problematic. They have a very delicate task of altering bills to their liking without killiing them.
I also read that Rep. Cornyn is voting against Sonia. That surprises many because he is from a state where many Hispanics voted for him. But… he also had some very generous Republicans at his back during that last election.
As always… money talks.
I am so disappointed our overalls idea has taken off. I thought we were being so fashion forward. I was looking into buying them in bulk so we could give Congress a good deal. That’s the thanks we get.
I read that the lobbyists /special interests spend about 1.4 mil a day on Capitol Hill. At first, I thought. Nah. Can’t be. Then I cleared the fog away and realized there probably isn’t one politician in DC who hasn’t been bought and paid for and more than once.
On the bright side. One rep has introduced the " Madoff Bill". I love it. Fat cats like Madoff would have to pay for their days in prison.
Cornyn cannot stand women, much less self-actualizing, intelligent women; instead he lies his way out but in most situations he cannot find his way out of a paper sack. He’s not one of our favored on the Hill.
Yep…that John Cornyn, the one Bush calls " Corndog." Many people though Rick Noreiga, lieutenant colonel in the Guard, would upset him. But those good ole boys made sure he is back in DC again! Texas politics.
Maggie, it’s such a damned shame isn’t it! Those of us here know full well many greats people in Texas, now and in the past - the past, in fact, is outright illustrious, especially in regards to philanthropy - the greatest of the wealthy I’ve worked "with," as donors and nothing ever stopped them from contributing, indeed supporting a cause I took to them (if they trusted you, there were no questions, merely - "What else needs to be done?"). These present nuts should be ashamed of themselves, and most would get blisters sitting on the fence, and also huge slivers from hopping on one side, then another - they need to step down, pay attention to their lives, families, and move over - before they’re shoved out en masse.
Texans will not take this much longer, and Kay Bailey Hutchinson may as well forego her run, and settle down again.
LL,
Thanks for that post.
Hot damn. This matches what I heard on C-Span Friday night. The Republicans are being denied the chance to be heard. This whoe thing is a sham.