Wall Street Weekly | 07/24/2009 2:15 pm
Obama Slump Boosts Market, by Liz Peek

© AP
Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 7/20)
Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.
Has Obama’s slump in the polls boosted stock prices? The earth shook in Washington this past week as the administration’s push to enact health-care changes received a massive thumping from voters. Notwithstanding nonstop multiday hectoring from President Obama, polls indicate slipping support for his agenda, causing even his own party to slam on the brakes.To my mind, the sudden drop in enthusiasm for the president (his approval ratings are now below Bush’s at the same time in his presidency – a shocker, right?) means some tempering of his legislative free-for-all. For investors, the setbacks suggest a timeout from the endless stream of anti-business initiatives flowing from the Obama White House.
There has been serious (and in my view reasonable) alarm over the administration’s inclination to meddle with a wide swath of industry. The cap and trade bill, the financial regulatory overhaul, the upending of corporate tax law, the new consumer protection agency, the takeover of the autos – these are just some of the proposals the Obama team have spun out in recent months – creating uncertainty and anxiety while the country sank into a recession. Only a few days ago there was talk of a second stimulus bill, a prospect that scared the pants off inflation and deficit hawks. With Rasmussen reporting that only 25% of Americans believe that the stimulus bill passed earlier this year has been effective, I think we can assign that particular notion to the meat locker.
It is true that there are other reasons for the market’s delightful 38% rally in the Dow that we’ve seen since March and the astonishing 11% jump over the past eight days. Without a doubt the collapse in housing markets has stabilized, and job losses appear to be mitigating. Existing home sales were up 3.6% in June to an eight-month high, reducing inventories of unsold units to 8.9 months, the lowest so far this year. Meanwhile, the four-week moving average of unemployment claims dropped to 566,000 in the latest period, down from the peak of 659,000 in April. A decline of this magnitude has in the past confirmed the end of a recession.
Moreover, second-quarter profits exceeded expectations for about 75% of those companies reporting so far. Reports out have beaten both analysts’ forecasts and in many cases the firms’ own projections, leading to a boost in estimates for the balance of the year. Normally some 60% of companies report better-than-expected results, since corporations know that coming in shy of projections is the quickest route to the doghouse. These surprises, though, seem genuine. When companies presented their outlooks around the beginning of the year, it looked like the U.S. was heading into a depression. Visibility was poor, to say the least.
Though all these factors have boosted the stock market, there remains enormous uncertainty, much of it tied to government policy. It has been decades since the government of the United States has appeared so anti-business, and decades since the need to support business has been so vital. We need people to be put back to work and while job losses may be slowing, companies are still loathe to add to payrolls. Increases in second-quarter profits came primarily from cost-cutting, including layoffs. Consequently, productivity rose to an impressive 3.8%. Revenue growth was weak at best.
Only the government is hiring. Ultimately, government spending can only provide a modest and temporary boost to the nation’s economy since it is coupled to rising deficits. At some point, paying back those deficits requires higher incomes and tax revenues from the private sector.
Read more about: Approval Ratings, Barack Obama, Economy, George Bush, Health-Care Reform, Liz Peek, Money, News, Obama Administration, Paula Danziger, Recession, Stimulus Bill, U.S., Wall Street Weekly























429 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
C jay,
What’s even dumber is that the members keep on paying each year.
Sounds to me like the doctors who have been cited with infractions are getting miffed.
Andera, talk to some RNs - they see, they know, they have lived watching the greatest and the worst in life - believe it. Doctors who are among the greatest ones know what to expect, understand medical and professional standards of ethical conduct, and prepare their practices and lives to be within the structure that augments their education - it’s their choice. Every scientist deserves to utilize their education, apply it for the reason it was undertaken, money is not the ultimate goal for the best clinicians, it’s helping, using talents and gifts to save lives.
On the other hand, with our enlarging culture in the US, many who have come here to practice were never under our Western (incl European) standards so yes, signage, ads, sexual misconduct, violations of our privacy laws, and much more have to be maintained - in our culture.
Lastly, when it comes to an NGO assocation representing any group, take it with a grain of salt. Let doctors speak for themselves. i would not trade an excellent physicians for $20,000,000. nor an RN either. What we need more of is excellent education (BS minimally) for RTs, OTs, et al - and recognition of all medical professionals so they are eligible for reimbursement - as things stand now, the health care "venors" (that Cornyn, et al have built up) are for profits, and there are no medically-licensed professionals in those companies (delivering oxygen, breathing equipment, treatments, etc), or few and everyone "works" off their state licenses. That has to stop!
C jay,
The situation in southern CA has changed remarkably in the past few years. Few physicians in my city will take Medicare, some will only take the top three insurance PPO plans, some physicians are taking cash only, and now some are retiring much earlier than expected. More and more foreign doctors are starting group practices.
I don’t know an occupational therapist who doesn’t have an MA in CA. Required by licensing board. Same with respiratory therapists. Am not familiar with licensing requirements in Texas.
I had Durable Power of Attorney for Health and Financial matters for an acquaintance of mine and as such I saw all the bills come in, the claims for payment, rejections, etc. Very eye opening. One of the things I noticed was that she had Home Health Aid come to the house and check things out, review pills and instructions, etc. I got their reports and a 6 year old could have written a better report. California does NOT do a good job on Home Health Aides. In CA they’re not under the LIcensing Board. Several schools have training classes in how to take BP and vital signs and admininster CPR then the "school" issues a certificate. There’s a huge misunderstanding about the qualifications of so-called medical professionals.
Another area of question is the CAC, which is a Certified Alcoholism Counselor. A private tech school charges a bundle for training then issues a "certificate." These people are not licensed in the State of CA. My grief with them is that often they tend to believe they have the expertise of a psychologist. This can be potentially dangerous for people they facilitate in group sessions.
People should make darned sure they understand the credentials and what they entail of health care providers.
We’ve gotten off track here, but exchanged some good information.
You are correct on all counts - same in Texas. CADACs are a laugh, and it’s unfair to those who go for that "certification." I was on the board of a medical certification group for years (in NYC and then in DC). Sure enough they started creating advanced certifications. Such non-academic letters after ones name means nothing to the public, only inflates ego from the inside and makes money.
For medical people that is unethical. The public we serve has a right to clearly understand who is attending them. Most professionals have their degrees, etc. prominently visibile, but who still goes into a doctor’s office to discuss anything any more - that is a rarity. Serious issues are discussed in "treatment rooms (horrors!)," and who knows what those things on the wall pertain to, much less to whom?
Don’t get me started on HHAs or personal care attendants. In Texas they’re paid minimum wage, never trained, much less oriented to a home or client, and even though the state law now requires a current TB test (I wrote and had our state law activated on that with great success) not one home health agency that I can find is obeying the state health law now, hence, people are caring for others at home w/o a TB test - in recessions TB gallops. This employment line is a critical part of the Olmstead Act, and "Money Follows the Person," yet they are treated as 2nd class citizens by the for-profit home health agencies - I know of PCAs who literally left their clients in danger, left - or when they had a seizure or passed out, they went on doing their "work," not realizing that the work was first to keep their client safe, and dial 911 if anything happened.
Believe me, I’m on the warpath about this in TX and I know someone who wrote a PCA Training Certification Curricula pro bono for the state - she was ignored. Not for long. There will be a huge lawsuit someday and it will all change.
Like the state schools here - until a group of us around the state called in the DOJ the abuse went on and on and on - now the state’s jumping through hoops.
In re our last chat - no elected official should be permitted to serve on any hospital board - period. Such carries serious potential for a conflict of interest and no amount of recuzing oneself can get around it. It demeans a Board of Trustee’s actions.
C jay,
This CAC, CADAC is a joke simply because too many people assume exactly as you said - that letters in back of name mean credibility. I had to explain the difference between my Ph.D. and a CAC more than once. Big eyes when it registered in their heads. The realy issue is that substance abuse most often requires adjunct treatment to get to the cause - I don’t have to explain it to you, You know.
Definitely - I remember when I was doing my supervised internship it was pounded into us that we need to advise the patient at the very beginning of our status. There was to be no question about our credentials.
HHA’s - agreed. Re the TB: southern CA is seeing an increase in the disease, often in resistant strains and we know that’s from influx of migration. It was so well under control until more recent years. I keep using OctoMom as an example because those who are reading our exchange will have some point of reference. Once the 8 preemies were brought home from the hospital and she canned the Angels in Waiting, she brought in some HHA’s from some local agency. One had positive outcome of TB……and yet no one prevented her from working until such time as a conclusive test was conducted. I recall when I did an internship in a psych hospital and later the infirmary of a university I had to get x-rayed. Let me tell you, if something the least bit suspicious came up I wouldn’t have been within 20 miles of the internship site.
I see your points re no medically licensed person serving on boards, but who then advocates the inherent medical issues that might be integral to the complaint? Surely there is need for one MD to serve to make sure the board understands medical ramifications.
Deb, You hit the nail on the head. The Liberal wing of the party is not happy. They want criminal prosecution of Bush and Cheney. They want the wars to end pronto. The Gays want gay rights moved to the front. Blacks are not happy over their higher unemployment rates. The Right Wing is so far right they can’t see he is a centrist.
Right Wingers like Liz Peek minipulate financial and poll data to push the right wing agenda.
Sarah Palin whines about people picking on her and quits ..
President Obama is getting the job done.
Starry-
"President Obama is getting the job done."
Have you looked at the recent polls lately? 1 out of 4 Democrats do not think he is doing a good job. That’s Democrats mind you. Just getting real Starry.
"Sixty-seven percent of Americans say that Obama is a strong and decisive leader and another two-thirds say that he understands the problems Americans face in their daily lives." Gallup, July 24, 2009
Any Democrats unhappy with President Obama’s policies, are unhappy that he has been SO Centrist and so conciliatory to the GOP, allowing them to water down policies without even voting for them in the end. They are unhappy that he is not pushing a Single Payer System and that he allowed Geitner to focus too much Stimulus money on the banks instead of from the bottom up. But still, they are pleased with his overall leadership and will vote for him in 12.