Wall Street Weekly | 10/02/2009 4:15 am
Obama: We Need Jobs, Not More Speeches, by Liz Peek

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 9/28)
Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.
Should President Obama have gone to Copenhagen to win the 2016 Olympics? Probably not, since the elimination of Chicago is something of an embarrassment. Still, since this campaign might have brought jobs to the U.S., it was worth the effort.
While Congress is debating the fine points of public options, smog production, Charlie Rangel’s ethics violations and whether credit card companies should give you one month or two to deal with a rate increase, more than 20 million Americans are without jobs. Today there are some 15 million people looking for work, 2.2 million who are unemployed but have given up the hunt, and another 9.2 million who have part-time jobs but would like a steadier situation. In addition, brokerage firm Charles Schwab recently reported that there are as many as 9.5 million retirees who are considering returning to the workforce.
Where are all those jobs going to come from? That’s what investors are beginning to ask, as job losses continue at a discouraging pace. Today the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that job losses in September totaled 263,000, up from 201,000 in August. Earlier in the week the government surprised economists by reporting that unemployment claims had increased by 17,000. Optimists pointed to the four-week moving average of claims which, with a slight decline to 548,000, reached the lowest level of the past 36 months. Instead of pointlessly analyzing these modest ups and downs, maybe we should step back and consider: more thsan a quarter million more Americans – mothers, fathers, sons and sisters — lost their jobs in the past month. The devastation is terrible.
The Obama administration has given the economy several shots of adrenaline through the Cash for Clunkers deal, the stimulus program and the $8,000 credit for new homebuyers. It is not enough. The minute we ran through the Clunkers bankroll, U.S. auto purchases plunged 23%, with GM and Chrysler both reporting a sales drop for September of over 40%. Similarly, the expected demise of the first-time homebuyer credit in December has the housing industry worried that sales will drop there too.
Meanwhile, sentiment readings from corporations have become less rosy. ISI Group reports that their pulse-taking among companies showed weakness for the second week in a row, with shipping, homebuilders and truckers’ responses "well below their peak." This echoes a disappointing durable good order figure last week.
It is clear we need a more sustaining therapy. It cannot come from government spending because federal budget deficits already threaten to compromise the dollar and produce future inflation. Instead, it must come from the private sector. All over the world governments are cutting taxes to spur industry, while U.S. legislators are panting to increase taxes – taxes on energy, taxes on foreign profits, taxes on small businesses, taxes on health insurance plans. Consider: France, a country that admires socialism almost as much as a superbly ripened Camembert, has just announced plans to eliminate a burdensome tax levied on business fixed investment. Francois Fillon, the finance minister, calls the change a "competitiveness shock." In addition, the administration is reducing taxes on small businesses if they hire workers.
























409 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
THE DEMS POISONOUS COCKTAIL
"One would think that at least two lessons would have been learned from the financial crisis: stop pushing loans to people who cannot or will not pay them back and stop offering loans with "flexible underwriting criteria." Not so. The Obama administration and Democrats in Congress are pushing their most audacious plan yet expanding the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) which helped spark the crisis in the first place.
As our old Hoover Institution friend Peter Schweizer points out in his Forbes column "Expanding the CRA," in the nine years running up to the economic crisis, banks operating under the constraints of the CRA to offer more than $4.2 trillion in loans to people they would ordinarily not lend money to. Now they want to expand the CRA to cover credit unions, other mortgage lenders and insurance companies. This would mean trillions more in what Peter refers to as affirmative action lending.
Peter’s new book on the origins of the financial crisis is Architects of Ruin: How Big Government Liberals Wrecked the Global Economy—and How They Will Do It Again if No One Stops Them. He argues that the CRA not only helped spark the crisis, but also that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac made possible the rise of subprime lenders such as Countrywide and Ameriquest.
As for the speculative action on Wall Street that contributed to the crisis, Peter points out that Washington had a hand in that too. Peter argues that the Clinton administration fueled the speculation by bailing out big investment houses such as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley five times during the Clinton years. The Clinton team not only pulled their chestnuts out of the fire from derivative investments around the world, they ensured that they actually profited from their risky behavior.
In finance they call this "moral hazard." It’s like bailing a friend with a DUI charge out of jail, giving them the keys to the car, and throwing a six pack in the back seat. Peter’s Forbes column suggests that the Democrats are turning in an encore performance.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/
Well, being new to this site has been an adventure. I have just read through all the posts on this site and I see that I am in the minority. I am an Independent, however, I lean more toward the conservative ideas. Guess that makes me in the minority on this site. As a former viewer of the "view" I do agree with you sibelle.
And, I will add, as far as I’m concerned, Joy Behar and some others on the show belong in my kitchen disposal! Hope my statement doesn’t upset anyone.
Thank you Sibelle and deber. I do think I’ll hang around for a while. And I do like this article by Liz Peek. It’s really funny, I never watch the "view" anymore, however, I was at a neighborhood "hen" party and the show was on one of the TV’s in the house. I saw whoopie Goldberg talking about this site so I thought "what the heck" I’ll give it a try.
Glad I did — I cannot tell you how concerned I am about the direction this country has taken. And, I can tell you that many of my neighbors feel the same way. We moved here from another state approximately 1 year ago - my husband is retired Air Force - so we are just getting acquainted with this area. But we do love it. At first I feared we would be in the minority in our thinking — not so! And, I think that concerned feeling is starting to spread.
Again, thank you for your welcome!
Barack Obama has been the number one topic of conversation among many of my friends and associates in London. His incompetence, narcissism and danger to the interests of the United States and its allies in Europe are startling people. I was asked "How does Obama view himself as President?" We happened to be sitting in a hotel which overlooked Buckingham Palace and suddenly the answer to the question came to me.
In the United Kingdom and many other countries with a parliamentary system there is a distinction between the head of state and the head of the government. In some countries such as Denmark, Spain and the United Kingdom the monarch either a King or Queen is considered the head of state and with that office goes all the trappings of royalty. The mundane responsibility of running the government falls to the elected Parliament and their chosen Prime Minister.
Of the world’s major democracies only the United States merges both functions into the office of President.
It appears that Barack Obama views himself as the head of state only. As such he cannot be bothered with the day to day responsibility of governance. He is, in his narcissistic world, above all that; thus he delegates the writing of the Stimulus, health care and other major bills to Nancy Pelosi, puts off any decisions on Iran and Afghanistan, appoints czars with power to spend and set policy and prefers to spend his time on television speaking to the huddled masses.
His responsibilities as the head of government have been assigned to others, who in many cases are not answerable to the American people. This has created untold chaos in Congress and apprehension among the citizenry. Yet the President appears not to care, as his interests lie elsewhere.
The Presidency of the United States to Mr. Obama is nothing more than a stage so he, pre-ordained by destiny, can act as head of state for the world. He is much too busy enjoying the trappings of royalty, despite his oft-declared disdain for that class, to be bothered about the dismal long term future of the United States if the left wing policies of his government are enacted. It appears President Obama also believes as the world head of state he can, by sheer force of his will, charm and persuasion convince the most brutal of global adversaries to live in peace.
The rest of the world has begun to see through his unrestrained self-absorption. The rejection of the Olympics for Chicago despite his personal intervention, and the published mockery of him by Nicholas Sarkozy are just the tip of the iceberg that is the real consensus of opinion, particularly in Europe.
However President Obama’s make-up is such that he will never accept any criticism as being valid when directed toward him, and will instead seek any excuse to explain away what is said or done as being the result of the failings of others.
Notwithstanding the determination of the founding fathers to avoid having a monarch, we now have one, at least in his own mind." http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/10/half_a_president_1.html
Glenda, "I feared we would be in the minority in our thinking"
Never fear! When you see a show like SNL making fun on Obama, you know "Revelations" are opening people’s eyes! No joke this time!lol Welcome to your new life!