Wall Street Weekly | 10/02/2009 3:15 am
Obama: We Need Jobs, Not More Speeches, by Liz Peek

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 9/28)
Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.
Should President Obama have gone to Copenhagen to win the 2016 Olympics? Probably not, since the elimination of Chicago is something of an embarrassment. Still, since this campaign might have brought jobs to the U.S., it was worth the effort.
While Congress is debating the fine points of public options, smog production, Charlie Rangel’s ethics violations and whether credit card companies should give you one month or two to deal with a rate increase, more than 20 million Americans are without jobs. Today there are some 15 million people looking for work, 2.2 million who are unemployed but have given up the hunt, and another 9.2 million who have part-time jobs but would like a steadier situation. In addition, brokerage firm Charles Schwab recently reported that there are as many as 9.5 million retirees who are considering returning to the workforce.
Where are all those jobs going to come from? That’s what investors are beginning to ask, as job losses continue at a discouraging pace. Today the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that job losses in September totaled 263,000, up from 201,000 in August. Earlier in the week the government surprised economists by reporting that unemployment claims had increased by 17,000. Optimists pointed to the four-week moving average of claims which, with a slight decline to 548,000, reached the lowest level of the past 36 months. Instead of pointlessly analyzing these modest ups and downs, maybe we should step back and consider: more thsan a quarter million more Americans – mothers, fathers, sons and sisters — lost their jobs in the past month. The devastation is terrible.
The Obama administration has given the economy several shots of adrenaline through the Cash for Clunkers deal, the stimulus program and the $8,000 credit for new homebuyers. It is not enough. The minute we ran through the Clunkers bankroll, U.S. auto purchases plunged 23%, with GM and Chrysler both reporting a sales drop for September of over 40%. Similarly, the expected demise of the first-time homebuyer credit in December has the housing industry worried that sales will drop there too.
Meanwhile, sentiment readings from corporations have become less rosy. ISI Group reports that their pulse-taking among companies showed weakness for the second week in a row, with shipping, homebuilders and truckers’ responses "well below their peak." This echoes a disappointing durable good order figure last week.
It is clear we need a more sustaining therapy. It cannot come from government spending because federal budget deficits already threaten to compromise the dollar and produce future inflation. Instead, it must come from the private sector. All over the world governments are cutting taxes to spur industry, while U.S. legislators are panting to increase taxes – taxes on energy, taxes on foreign profits, taxes on small businesses, taxes on health insurance plans. Consider: France, a country that admires socialism almost as much as a superbly ripened Camembert, has just announced plans to eliminate a burdensome tax levied on business fixed investment. Francois Fillon, the finance minister, calls the change a "competitiveness shock." In addition, the administration is reducing taxes on small businesses if they hire workers.























409 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Progressives are a proud group and will defeat the right wing extremists. Conservatives should continue to speak out against the Limbaughs, Hannity’s and Becks. We need to get the country back on track for the good off everyone.
I am trying to understand the conservative or Republican platform. It is not what the current crop of repubicans are spewing. They lie. There are no death panels or funds for abortion but that does not stop them. The illegal immigrants were not included in the original bill.
They have endless "facts" provided by Fox News . Cato Institute and other right wing groups provide biased data that is passed off as non-partisan data.
I did not lie. The bill does not cover illegal immigrants or abortion. The bill was ammended to add a requirement for proof of citizenship.
My point is the door is all ways open no matter what you do - There is no wording that says abortion or illegal immigrants are covered in the bill. Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water. Just because there is no guarantee that your identity won’t be stolen- do you not bank on line, shop or pay bills? So it is with health care reform.
Private insurance covers illegal immigrants and abortion now. If people pay for the insurance why not let them have it?
Starry I have said this time and time again but it never seems to sink in b/c you feel I lean to the right so you dont read what I post but I’ll say it again….I want anyone who is sick to get medical help & that includes those coming to our Country illegially. I do not want them walking around sick and spreading whatever germs or disease they have onto anyone…I would love to beef up our borders so to keep those sick OUT.
But the bill at first did not have anything to stop it and yes it was added after Obama was called out on it by Wilson but it was a lie at first to say "they would not be covered"….That is not something I will argue or discuss any further.
The ladies I know who have had abortions by choice did not have their insurance cover it - it was paid for out of pocket. Now if it is medically necessary, yes their insurance paid for it.
You may not want to argue are discuss the issue but President Obama did not lie when he said illegal immigrants were not includied in the bill. Addiding proof of citizenship is just an additional requirement and if makes the right wing happy and will get the bill passed great.
You must be smarter than scholars of the Catholic Church. Today the Congress received a letter from the Catholic Bishops saying, in effect, they would not support the bill in its current language concerning abortion, because it leaves the door open for federally funded abortion.
Also, in yesterday’s news, it was noted that President Obama, as a Harvard law graduate, would know that the Supreme Court had ruled that any services provided by the government had to be provided also to illegial immigrants. This was in regard to education, and would also apply to health services.
True, there are no "death panels," but with half a billion dollars for the new bill coming out of Medicare, you may be sure services will be cut, which will ultimately result in rationing services.
Anyone not facing these facts is being deliberately naive.
Nevertheless, they would not be concerned if they weren’t convinced abortions would be covered with tax dollars.
Half a billion coming out of medicare has nothing to do with patient care. The insurance companies are double dipping when patients have the so called advantage plans. People have both employer based private insurance and medicare.
So give the death panel a rest.