Wall Street Weekly | 10/02/2009 3:15 am
Obama: We Need Jobs, Not More Speeches, by Liz Peek

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 9/28)
Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.
Should President Obama have gone to Copenhagen to win the 2016 Olympics? Probably not, since the elimination of Chicago is something of an embarrassment. Still, since this campaign might have brought jobs to the U.S., it was worth the effort.
While Congress is debating the fine points of public options, smog production, Charlie Rangel’s ethics violations and whether credit card companies should give you one month or two to deal with a rate increase, more than 20 million Americans are without jobs. Today there are some 15 million people looking for work, 2.2 million who are unemployed but have given up the hunt, and another 9.2 million who have part-time jobs but would like a steadier situation. In addition, brokerage firm Charles Schwab recently reported that there are as many as 9.5 million retirees who are considering returning to the workforce.
Where are all those jobs going to come from? That’s what investors are beginning to ask, as job losses continue at a discouraging pace. Today the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that job losses in September totaled 263,000, up from 201,000 in August. Earlier in the week the government surprised economists by reporting that unemployment claims had increased by 17,000. Optimists pointed to the four-week moving average of claims which, with a slight decline to 548,000, reached the lowest level of the past 36 months. Instead of pointlessly analyzing these modest ups and downs, maybe we should step back and consider: more thsan a quarter million more Americans – mothers, fathers, sons and sisters — lost their jobs in the past month. The devastation is terrible.
The Obama administration has given the economy several shots of adrenaline through the Cash for Clunkers deal, the stimulus program and the $8,000 credit for new homebuyers. It is not enough. The minute we ran through the Clunkers bankroll, U.S. auto purchases plunged 23%, with GM and Chrysler both reporting a sales drop for September of over 40%. Similarly, the expected demise of the first-time homebuyer credit in December has the housing industry worried that sales will drop there too.
Meanwhile, sentiment readings from corporations have become less rosy. ISI Group reports that their pulse-taking among companies showed weakness for the second week in a row, with shipping, homebuilders and truckers’ responses "well below their peak." This echoes a disappointing durable good order figure last week.
It is clear we need a more sustaining therapy. It cannot come from government spending because federal budget deficits already threaten to compromise the dollar and produce future inflation. Instead, it must come from the private sector. All over the world governments are cutting taxes to spur industry, while U.S. legislators are panting to increase taxes – taxes on energy, taxes on foreign profits, taxes on small businesses, taxes on health insurance plans. Consider: France, a country that admires socialism almost as much as a superbly ripened Camembert, has just announced plans to eliminate a burdensome tax levied on business fixed investment. Francois Fillon, the finance minister, calls the change a "competitiveness shock." In addition, the administration is reducing taxes on small businesses if they hire workers.























409 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
President Barack Obama’s failed bid to bring the 2016 Olympic Games to Chicago cost more than a bruised ego.
Taxpayers shelled out probably $1 million or more for the president, his wife and others to fly to Copenhagen and back to woo members of the International Olympic Committee.
A 2006 congressional study pegged the cost of flying Air Force One at $56,518 an hour. The Pentagon recently said it cost $100,219 an hour to fly the huge, reconfigured Boeing 747 without Obama aboard. The Pentagon estimate included more costs for support needs, such as maintenance.
At those rates, the president’s 14-hour trip to Copenhagen and back cost about $790,000 to $1.4 million.
However, presidential travel requires additional spending, especially for security personnel and equipment. Also, first lady Michelle Obama and some administration officials traveled to Copenhagen at public expense ahead of the president.
The Copenhagen trip was not devoted entirely to the Olympics bid. Obama spent 25 minutes conferring with Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal, his top Afghan war commander. McChrystal had been in London for a speech, and he made the relatively short trip to Denmark to meet with Obama.
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_olympics_cost_trip/2009/10/02/267924.html
Obama’s bid for the Olympics was political payback for Mayor Daley in my opinion….Chicago the most politically corrupt city in the United States with high crime rates.
Mayor Daley, clean up your democratic inner city! Reach out to the poor!
Deber, from what I’ve read, the President decided to go at the last minute when he learned the USA would be the only contending country without its national leader there to help make the pitch.
I’m very happy for Rio. It’s a beautiful city. Like most tourists, I was kept away from the abject poverty and filth most people live in there. Rio will do what China did; it will clean up those hovels before athletes and visitors from the world over descend. This is a big win in more ways than one for Rio.
Gianna Bracco, it is my opinion that President Obama, Michelle and Oprah were blatantly making a political bid for Mayor Daley…and the most corrupt state, politically, in our country. There is alot of crime there as well.
I don’t hate Chicago and its people. I don’t hate anyone. I was simply being a realist knowing that Chicago didn’t stand a chance. Even Michelle and Obama’s "tender" stories didn’t move the judges. I’m sure it didn’t help that Michelle stated she use to sit on her father’s lap when watching Nadia Comenici. That would’ve made Michelle 20 or 21 years old! I don’t know why the democrats seem to have a difficult time with the simple truth. Right up there with the President giving two separate versions on how he met "his wife."
Yep, not a dry eye in the house alright. Here’s one example of the consequences when you go around the world apologizing for the good citiizens of the United States of America.
Rio is also a beautiful city with great people and will do an excellent job with the Olympics.
Thanks for your reply deber B. I think it was brought out last year when our ex-governor was in the news that Illinois isn’t actually the most corrupt state in the country, after all; it’s just got the most colorful and interesting reputation! As far as crime goes, that’s one contest that is up for grabs among big American cities and none of them are immune to that problem.
As far as anything else goes, I’m not going to argue any of your points. Being a lifelong Chicagoan, I am just proud of the place and find most people speak out of ignorance without knowing anything about the city. But your beliefs are set in stone and there’s no room for any kind of change of thought no matter what happens, so more power to you. You are correct. Only the Democrats (especially from Chicago) make decisions based on political motives, only the Democrats lie, cheat, steal, probably are mean to their nanas, and Jesus himself could knock on your door and tell you you’re wrong, that he’s a Democrat, and you’d slam the door in his face.
Good for you. I guess my beliefs have never been that positive. Sometimes I hear another side of a story and think, "hmm, that makes sense, too," and then I’m forced to look at different points of view. That gets confusing. But I have to disagree with one thing you said. I believe you do, literally, feel hate, and that’s a shame.
My pleasure, Gianna Bracco. Colorful is a good word for Chicago politics. We all feel a certain amount of pride for the cities/towns we live in so I can fully understand your pride in Chicago.
Quite frankly, I wouldn’t slam the door in anyone’s face. That doesn’t suit my personality. I believe there are good people on both sides of the aisle.
No, sorry MKP, I have never really hated anyone in my entire life. I am proud to be a republican.
And you, Gianna….are you all set to change YOUR political beliefs? It certainly doesn’t sound like an open mind on your end.
I think one reason conservatives have such a problem with Democratic policies is that they haven’t worked. Billions of welfare dollars have done nothing but destroy families….women bearing child after child with various men, no fathers in so many homes, drugs and drug dealers dominating many poor areas. Generations of families expecting not to work, but to have a check every month from the government. Do those people not realize the government has to take money from people who DO work to support them?
And do you really believe that’s the way to run this country?
Liz…Obameconomics, like today’s OIC annoucement…an Epic Fail.
Yesterday, California released a state sponsored study of what can be done to save their failed economy…the top decision…tax cuts on businesses and on the top tax payers (trickle down…Reaganonics).
The World has awakened to Obama; California has admitted that you cannot tax your way out of economic failure—that true economic growth occurs when producers have more to work/spend with…when will the rest of the US also see this?