Sharia Law in Pakistan's Swat Valley | 04/14/2009 10:30 am
Pakistan Signs On to Sharia Law in Swat Valley; Taliban Creeps Further Into Country

Pakistan isn’t doing much to assuage Western fears that the country is headed for disaster.
President Asif Ali Zardari on Monday signed a rule allowing the Taliban to impose Sharia law in the Swat Valley. Many officials around the globe, as well as human-rights groups, reacted with alarm to the news that Sharia law was coming to Swat. They think the former tourist hot-spot will now be a safe haven for the Taliban and other insurgent groups.
This latest news certainly doesn’t quell those fears and many think it will only embolden the Taliban, which supports public whipping and other harsh punishments for women who challenge or break their repressive rules.
"I don’t think this law is going to appease the Taliban. It’s just going to give them a taste of victory," Asma Jahangir, a United Nations specialist on religious freedoms, told The Guardian.
"If you are the Taliban and you believe in such public displays of harsh measures, you are then capable of doing anything, especially once you have legal cover," one Western diplomat in Islamabad told The Financial Times. "The danger is that these laws give cover to practices that have questionable legitimacy."
Meanwhile, there’s more proof the Taliban and insurgents are making more headway in Pakistan. The New York Times reports that the right-wing group has joined forces with local militant groups in Punjab, the impoverished province that is home to more than half the nation’s population. Officials in both Pakistan and the United States fear that this type of armed alliance poses a serious security risk, particularly because they were responsible for last fall’s bombing of the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad, among other attacks.
"I don’t think a lot of people understand the gravity of the issue," a senior police official in Punjab told the Times. "If you want to destabilize Pakistan, you have to destabilize Punjab."























21 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Not possible and not practical, but one cannot help but feel someone somewhere should get in there and rescue all the girls. Women mean nothing to these people.
Zardari is weak; much as the US complained about Musharraf, he was a great asset to the US over there. The border areas of Pakistan have been a Taliban/extremist haven from Day One and Zardari had just made it worse.
What’s really bad for us is that 70% of our supplies and materials to support Afghanistan operations goes through Pakistan. Including, obviously, the border areas…
http://internationalcomment.blogspot.com/2009/03/pakistans-impact-on-ope…Once again the funding of the taliban by the likes of Reagan and such are what helped put the taliban and such where they are..What was done years ago has been the catalyst of these orginizations. Had they been left alone and never trained ,we might not being seeing the things we have. History backs this up.
You know, no matter whose fault it is, and we can all argue that point for 30 more years, it is sad all the way around that these women have to live this way…isnt it great we dont? Now think of the things that you have said and imagine if you lived there what would happen to you…you would die a slow horrible death.
Lets move on out of the past and try to make the future better. Living in the past gets you nowhere, its like making the same u-turn over and over and over again. Some say this and others say that…we could go on and on and on and on and on…
What matters is whats happening now and how we can change it for the future. Not who you think is to blame.