Politics | 05/31/2009 11:00 pm
Pro-Life Feminism Births a Great – and Inexhaustible – Debate

Like Giroux, Dannenfelser also bristles over use of the F word. When asked whether she describes herself as a feminist, Dannenfelser replied, “Yeah, I do – depending on whom I’m talking to because some people take it the wrong way.” And, as should be apparent, not everyone views feminism in quite the same light.
Marsh characterizes feminism as “insuring that every woman has the God-given civil rights that we were born with, to be totally free to envision her life as she wants without restriction, except by law … and the Golden Rule.” Carrie Lukas of the more conservative-minded Independent Women’s Forum, seems to have a similar definition and describes feminism “as the belief that women are men’s equals – the ideal that women should have the same opportunities, responsibilities and protections as men.”
That said Lukas prefers what she calls “free market feminism,” which “recognizes that government isn’t always the best way to eradicate sexism and in fact can make the problem worse.” What has been called “feminism,” she claims, “is really less about equality and more about expanding government.”
“Embracing everything feminist is what feminism is to me”
There can be little consensus about feminism, its origins and its mission. Nor, with the ever-expanding spectrum, does it seem there can ever be one true definition of “feminism.” But that raises perhaps the most important question: Does there need to be a “true” definition of the F word? Though Dannenfelser realizes people will disagree with her maternal approach, this annular remark speaks volumes about the ongoing debate, “To be a feminist, to love being a feminist, embracing everything feminist is what feminism is to me.” Clearly there’s no authoritative brand of “feminism,” just as there’s no one brand of woman.
[Editor’s Note: It’s worth noting that another pro-life feminist group, Feminists4Life, did not reply to repeated calls for comment, nor did the pro-choice National Organization for Women, Planned Parenthood or NARAL Pro-Choice America.]























317 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
""""Dannenfelser, who grew up Episcopalian and points out that she was once pro-choice, insists she’s turned off by the violence inherent in abortion""""""
I wonder what these women feel and think about murdering Dr. Tiller—that was OK?
How typical…dragging an indefensible murder into this thread.
I happen to agree with "these women" on a number of points. Instead of throwing in an unrelated murder, try dealing with their opinions…..
Hendricks: Tiller’s killers were many
excerpt: "However, the motive for the crime we can all surmise in light of the vitriolic campaign that has been waged against Tiller for more than two decades by anti-abortion groups.
And if we’re right about that, then we already know the identities of his accomplices.
They include every one who has ever called Tiller’s late term abortion clinic a murder mill.
Who ever called Tiller "Tiller the Killer."
The groups who spent decades fomenting hate toward a man who simply believed that he was serving a purpose by being one of the few doctors in the country performing late-term abortions.
Hate. Not heated opposition. Not strong disagreement.
But blind hatred.
The kind of hate that would prompt some maniac to take a gun into a church and shoot a man to death in front of friends and family.
His accomplices know they have blood on their hands, which might explain why they were quick to issue statements today expressing disapproval of Tiller’s murder.
Among them, the anti-abortion group Operation Rescue.
"Operation Rescue denounces the killing of abortionist Tiller," read the headline of a new release posted on that group’s website.
Those words drip with hypocrisy.
After all, it was Operation Rescue that coined the nickname "Tiller the Killer." It was Operation Rescue that was most responsible for ratcheting up the heated rhetoric toward Tiller over the past two decades.
The group issued the following statement today:
"We are shocked at this morning’s disturbing news that Mr. Tiller was gunned down. Operation Rescue has worked for years through peaceful, legal means, and through the proper channels to see him brought to justice. We denounce vigilantism and the cowardly act that took place this morning. We pray for Mr. Tiller’s family that they will find comfort and healing that can only be found in Jesus Christ."
Shocked? Are any of us really shocked that it would come to this after the many years of demonizing one man?
I’d suggest that if anyone is in need of salvation right now it’s the anti-abortion movement in Kansas and across the nation.
As Terry’s statement makes clear, the same bullet that killed George Tiller also shattered the moral underpinnings of the movement that inspired its firing."
"The kind of hate that would prompt some maniac to take a gun into a church and shoot a man to death in front of friends and family."
Sounds like the same maniac that went into many wombs to take those lives out of there and right in front of God, the Mother and all other onlookers……WoW, the simularities………Astounding!
LL…we dont know what the state of mind the parents were in when making the choice to abort the baby with 3 arms, maybe having one of the arms wasnt able to fix? Whatever the case may be, wether we like it or not, that is not our choice. It sucks that some would take the easy road then to live with a challenged child, but that is their choice. Personally I would only abort if my life was at stake or my child would not live outside the womb…alot of these birth defects and life threatening (sp) can’t be detected until late and it is truly very sad.
Lets not assume this Dr was bad b/c of the job he did, we could assume that about our Military and Law Enforcement also…