Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Wall Street Weekly | 09/18/2009 12:45 pm

Raising Taxes and Protectionism: Recipe for Double Dip? by Liz Peek

© Shutterstock

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 9/14) 

Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.

Good news! At long last, there actually is a chicken in every pot. In fact, there are so many chickens in U.S. pots that producers are dying to ship some to China. Unfortunately, that prospect suddenly became a bit dicey earlier this week, thanks to an emerging trade battle that President Obama has initiated with Beijing. Standing tall with his friends in Big Labor, the president slapped a 35% tariff on tires imported from China, which immediately provoked a retaliatory move to "investigate" whether U.S.-produced chicken (and auto parts) are being unfairly dumped in that country.

The jury is still out on whether the president’s move will spur an all-out trade war (or buy necessary health-care votes in Congress from tire-producing states). More important, perhaps, is whether the move is symptomatic of an anti-trade bias that, in conjunction with other policies unfavorable to business, will stall our recovery. Taking its cue from labor unions, the administration has not initiated any new trade talks with our allies. Moreover, it has not pushed forward pending agreements with South Korea, an especially important friend to the U.S. in Asia, or with Panama or Colombia. That is not a good sign.

The one thing that almost all economists agree upon is that the Depression was prolonged by protectionism and higher taxes. Here we are, throwing up trade barriers, putting harmful "Buy American" provisions in the stimulus package, prohibiting Mexican trucks from using our highways, including punitive tariffs in the cap-and-trade bill and generally undermining our trading partners. The World trade Organization reported just this week that the U.S. had created 15 "potentially protectionist" measures between April and August. We are not alone; other countries have been erecting trade barriers as well.

Make no mistake – such measures have already hurt American workers. Canadian municipalities have responded by passing "do not buy American" resolutions that have blocked imports, while it has been reported that the spending of stimulus money has been slowed by the complicated provisions.

At the same time, of course, the president is proposing to raise taxes on a good segment of our taxpayers as well as on corporations large and small. One of the principal concerns about the stalled health-care bill is the impact it would have on small (and large) businesses. The other day, Andy Puzder, CEO of CKE Restaurants, said on CNBC that if the health-care bill is passed, the company will be forced to fund the 8% payroll tax by shelving its expansion program. As he said, the "only place we could get that money from if it doesn’t come from higher prices is the money we’re using now to build new restaurants and to create new jobs." In his view, the fee would "quell one of the few industries that are adding jobs."

You have to wonder: Other than hiking government spending, what is this administration doing to boost business, which ultimately will determine job growth? Certainly, government incentives to buy cars and homes have helped stabilize two of our hardest-hit industries. These measures, though, are meant to be temporary (though currently the administration is considering extending the home-buyer incentive). Eventually, federal assists will disappear.

Meanwhile, people out of work continue to struggle. Though new unemployment claims have drifted lower, the numbers suggest a poky recovery. Continuing claims are still rising (to 6.23 million from 6.1 million in the most recent week), which is not positive. Going forward, job creation will depend on corporate profit growth and increased investment. Though the trends are in the right direction, there remains considerable uncertainty about the pace and sustainability of an upturn.

122 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Lee Harrison
Another good article Liz.  I was horrified at the tariff on Chinese-made tires.  It’s my understanding that those tires are not made in the U.S., so what he’s done is deny us access to low-priced tires, forcing us to pay more.  This does not help the un or under employed…but it sure helps the labor unions.
By Lee Harrison on 09/18/2009 12:40 pm
Marcia Cupschalk

What other countries besides China are erecting trade barriers that will affect the US? Also, how are these other countries being affected by such actions?

I thought the decision against the tire importation measure was in part because what we (United States) were getting from China was inferior according to the industry standards. Our lives are really dependent on good quality tires when we get behind the wheel of our automobiles.

I am not too pleased with some of the other measures that are being passed by the administration, but I need to get more information before I feel confident in my assessments. However, a very interesting piece by Liz Peek.

By Marcia Cupschalk on 09/18/2009 12:47 pm
Holy Mackrel!
I read that too Marcia. Their tires are not up to standards. Now let’s stop importing their poison toys! Besides, why is it alright for China to impose tariffs on us, but when we do it it is called "protectionism"? I’m not for tariffs on everything, but we definitely should protect some of our industries, if we have any left.
By Holy Mackrel! on 09/18/2009 1:21 pm
deber B
By deber B on 09/18/2009 1:36 pm
Maggie W

"Encouraging people to borrow money to buy cars when consumers are already deeply in debt is not appealing."  I don’t recall this administration advising anyone to go into debt or deepen his/her debt so that person could buy a new car.  The administration had two choices; bail out the auto industry or let it fail.  If it did,  many thousands of suppliers would have hit bottom as well, sending the unemployment rate sky rocketing.  If so, I’m guessing Ms. Peek would have wondered why that was allowed to happen as well.

There will always be those who preach doomsday.  Right now there are numerous simultaneous conversations about changes that are occurring.  There is that constant tug of war between fear and hope.  There are those who promote that fear so easily  and slyly; I’m surprised certain people aren’t digging holes in their back yards to bury canned goods and the silverware.   It’s very easy to stand still, eyes closed tightly, buy into that fear, and whine loudly. 

It’s been one ugly summer for argument, and the  " assume the worst at all times" rhetoric continues. But the fact is, household wealth grew by $ 2 trillion ( about 4%) this past spring, ending the longest stretch of quarterly declines on record dating back to 1952.  Stock portfolios rebounded this spring and home prices have stabilized.  The value of real estate holdings rose 1.8% , the first gain since 2006.   Also, student emrollment in local and state universities is up. 

The recovery will be lethargic; most economists and analysts agree.  No surprise there.   It will be even longer for those who believe we have not the will to face or the know how to fix anything.  While Ms. Peek makes her usual and predictable case, it’s wise to see what those other analysists have to say.  You may be quite surprised.

 

By Maggie W on 09/18/2009 1:27 pm
C Hardy
Maggie - please explain what you mean by household wealth grew by $2 trillon - I sure havent seen any growth in that dept in my household…as a matter of fact the bank I work for stopped giving raises to us farther down the totem poll and my hubbys job for the states cut backs he wont be getting any raises either…so not sure where the household wealth grew…please let me know. 
By C Hardy on 09/18/2009 2:28 pm
Maggie W
Jeannine Aversa, AP, Sept. 18.  That would include trimming debt loads such as mortgages, credit cards, consumer loans, etc. According to that same article, households recouped $2 trillion in the second quarter.  In addition, Americans trimmed their spending habits considerably.
By Maggie W on 09/18/2009 2:38 pm
C Hardy
Thank you! 
By C Hardy on 09/18/2009 2:48 pm
Xiulan Li

You want to talk about the auto industry?  How’s this for a nice auto industry story?……

More "Dancing With The Czars" —

Remember when we couldn’t figure out why some car dealers were closed and others not?  Now the plot thickens.  A Washington news source has exposed the connection.

Re Chrysler:   Amazingly, of the 789 dealerships closed by the federal government, 788 had donated money, exclusively to Republican political causes, while contributing nothing to Democratic political causes. The only "Democratic" dealership on the list was found to have donated $7,700 to Hillary’s campaign, and a bit over $2,000 to John Edwards. This same dealership, reportedly, also gave $200.00 to Obama’s campaign." 

Odd?

Steve Rattner, official Car Czar, put the list together.  He’s married to a Maureen White, who happens to be the former national finance chairman of the DNC.  So she had access to everyone in the nation’s campaign donation records, Republican AND Democrat. 

But, of course, that’s just a wacky "coincidence."

Another amazing thing…as this story was going to press, Obama’s Car Czar, Steve Rattner, resigned and was promptly replaced by former steel workers union boss Ron Bloom. 

And by the way, Rattner is under investigation for a multi-million dollar pay-to-play investment bank scandal in New York.  And rumor has it he’s also under investigation for what could be pay-to-play scandal involving the closing of Chrysler and GM dealerships.

This is horrifying, being as how this used to be the United States of America.  It would appear that these Czar henchmen have the power to destroy private businesses and eliminate upwards of 100,000 jobs because they have a different political agenda. 

There have been demands for an explanation, but the "Automotive Task Force" has released nothing to the public or any of the senators demanding answers.

It’s time to start calling our congressmen again.

By Xiulan Li on 09/18/2009 10:25 pm
Scarlett Ohara Mitchell

Li, As I read your article, I shook my head in amazement. Every day it is something new. Thank you for this information.

By Scarlett Ohara Mitchell on 09/18/2009 10:39 pm
STACY SEARS
Li…thank you for the information!  This certainly makes one shake their head in amazement!
By STACY SEARS on 09/19/2009 3:38 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe
When posting from other sources, please cite the source. The above is obviously another smear with shaky legs.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 09/19/2009 9:34 am
Xiulan Li

It’s pretty well all over the internet.  But here is one link which features both HuffPo comments and others:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Fur…

By Xiulan Li on 09/19/2009 12:04 pm
Xiulan Li

And here’s another source:

http://detroit.craigslist.org/mcb/rnr/1364305383.html

I saw several blogger comments when googling for information from liberal sites which said such things as, "I’m glad all the Dodge dealers in my area were closed down…they had supported the Republican candidate exclusively last election."….etc., etc., ad nauseum.

By Xiulan Li on 09/19/2009 12:17 pm
Xiulan Li

IMO, the only thing with shaky legs right now is the administration.

IGWT

By Xiulan Li on 09/19/2009 3:20 pm