Wall Street Weekly | 05/15/2009 12:35 pm
Unknowns Squash Rally: Too Much Change? by Liz Peek
The consumer, in short, is still in the deep end of the pool, trying to keep her hair dry.

© iStock
Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 5/11)
Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.
I miss the rally! After an eight-week fiesta that drove the S&P 500 index up 37%, the stock market remembered this week that we are still in a recession, that the autos are going broke, that the credit markets are still tangled up in Juicy Fruit, that the Obama administration is driving government deficits into the stratosphere and rewriting the rules of our economy along the way, that jobs are scarce and that taxes are going up. Darn!
We are at an inflexion point. Investors have determined that the world’s economies are not headed for extinction, but they are not at all clear on just what the recovery will look like.There is no shortage of opinions. The Dalai Lama has weighed in, fingering greed, speculation and a lack of transparency as triggering the financial crisis. (Sounds like he’s been hanging out in the White House.) A popular social diarist in New York depressed hundreds of lunching ladies this past Wednesday by predicting that it would be ten or fifteen years before things get back to normal. Alan Greenspan, James Wolfensohn, Fed Chair Bernanke, my doorman – everyone has a view.
The truth is, nobody knows. An AP heading this morning says it all: “Stocks are set for a lower open after data showed consumer-level inflation was flat last month, as expected.” Huh? If it was expected, why would that send the market lower? Only because the stock market, which in its weird way always seems to anticipate what’s coming next, has entered a “show me” phase. Rightly so. Recent gains have been fueled by signs that the rate of decline has dropped; that’s a welcome change from the accelerating collapse earlier this year, but declining declines won’t produce rising earnings. We need to see the “green shoots” take root.
Where will growth come from? That’s the tricky question. It’s pretty clear that any upturn in consumer spending – 70% of the economy – is going to be sluggish. The savings rate recently topped 5%, explaining poky retail readings. We know that past spending was boosted by massive withdrawals of home equity, which is no longer available. Meanwhile, the luxury of dropping oil prices has turned around of late, as has the decline in mortgage rates, which caused a tidal wave of beneficial refinancing. As is typical in this phase of the cycle, job losses are continuing. With unemployment at 8.9%, wages aren’t going up, and hours worked will likely only creep higher, with employers reluctant to add workers until the recovery is assured. The consumer, in short, is still in the deep end of the pool, trying to keep her hair dry.
Could the economy get a boost from capital spending? Doubtful. Corporate profits drive outlays for new plant and equipment; first-quarter earnings were off about 35% year-over-year. Moreover, capacity utilization for manufacturing in March fell to a record low of 65.8%. Why would companies expand plant? At the same time, office-vacancy rates are just beginning to drop, in part because construction boomed prior to this recession.
There is some optimism that export demand will boost GDP in the United States. Unfortunately, that hope also is being voiced in Germany, China and just about every other manufacturing country. Who’s going to be doing the importing? Unless we’ve unearthed a lost Atlantis of spendthrift consumers, it’s unlikely that exports will drive growth.
This pretty much leaves the government as the engine of last resort. Of course, this is why government spending is meant to climb as a portion of total GDP during recessions. However, investors are beginning to question whether the government’s “pump priming” will decline once the private sector regains its footing. Increasingly, investors are concluding that the Obama administration’s ambitions will drive deficits higher, and higher still.
Read more about: Barack Obama, Ben Bernanke, Business, David Walker, Economy, Liz Peek, Money, Peterson Foundation, Real Estate, Recession, retail, Wall Street Weekly























25 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Liz: I miss the rally!
Me too !! A rally puts me in a shopping mood. I love being able to fill up the shopping cart with whatever I want — now it’s back to asking, Do I really need it. Bummer.
The stock market hates uncertainty. With all these changes in the wind, investors may well take the summer off. Groan. Seems the only ones smiling are the unions, they put the money up and they’re getting payed off.
Good article. You make the related events easy to understand.
Liz
The administration hired Geithner, and he is from Wall Street. Some days I am glad he is there, and other days I think what have we done? Will we be living through one inflexion point after another in a never ending story or learning how to govern?
Hey Chromie
Just keep doing what you do and as we all one by one hold the economy together, and if they can do something about fair regulation, or enforcing current regulations, maybe the administration can come to some kind of understanding with Wall Street. I figure it is just keep putting one foot in front of the other and sooner or later we will get somewhere.
Well miss Em… I’m certainly doing my part to contribute to the economy :)
My friend Liz, isn’t the stock market generally quite predictably a poor performer in the summer time?
Namaste.