Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Wall Street Weekly | 05/15/2009 12:35 pm

Unknowns Squash Rally: Too Much Change? by Liz Peek

The consumer, in short, is still in the deep end of the pool, trying to keep her hair dry.
By Liz Peek
© iStock

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 5/11) 

Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.

I miss the rally! After an eight-week fiesta that drove the S&P 500 index up 37%, the stock market remembered this week that we are still in a recession, that the autos are going broke, that the credit markets are still tangled up in Juicy Fruit, that the Obama administration is driving government deficits into the stratosphere and rewriting the rules of our economy along the way, that jobs are scarce and that taxes are going up. Darn!

We are at an inflexion point. Investors have determined that the world’s economies are not headed for extinction, but they are not at all clear on just what the recovery will look like. 

There is no shortage of opinions. The Dalai Lama has weighed in, fingering greed, speculation and a lack of transparency as triggering the financial crisis. (Sounds like he’s been hanging out in the White House.) A popular social diarist in New York depressed hundreds of lunching ladies this past Wednesday by predicting that it would be ten or fifteen years before things get back to normal. Alan Greenspan, James Wolfensohn, Fed Chair Bernanke, my doorman – everyone has a view.

The truth is, nobody knows. An AP heading this morning says it all: “Stocks are set for a lower open after data showed consumer-level inflation was flat last month, as expected.” Huh? If it was expected, why would that send the market lower? Only because the stock market, which in its weird way always seems to anticipate what’s coming next, has entered a “show me” phase. Rightly so. Recent gains have been fueled by signs that the rate of decline has dropped; that’s a welcome change from the accelerating collapse earlier this year, but declining declines won’t produce rising earnings. We need to see the “green shoots” take root.

Where will growth come from? That’s the tricky question. It’s pretty clear that any upturn in consumer spending – 70% of the economy – is going to be sluggish. The savings rate recently topped 5%, explaining poky retail readings. We know that past spending was boosted by massive withdrawals of home equity, which is no longer available. Meanwhile, the luxury of dropping oil prices has turned around of late, as has the decline in mortgage rates, which caused a tidal wave of beneficial refinancing. As is typical in this phase of the cycle, job losses are continuing. With unemployment at 8.9%, wages aren’t going up, and hours worked will likely only creep higher, with employers reluctant to add workers until the recovery is assured. The consumer, in short, is still in the deep end of the pool, trying to keep her hair dry.

Could the economy get a boost from capital spending? Doubtful. Corporate profits drive outlays for new plant and equipment; first-quarter earnings were off about 35% year-over-year. Moreover, capacity utilization for manufacturing in March fell to a record low of 65.8%. Why would companies expand plant? At the same time, office-vacancy rates are just beginning to drop, in part because construction boomed prior to this recession.

There is some optimism that export demand will boost GDP in the United States. Unfortunately, that hope also is being voiced in Germany, China and just about every other manufacturing country. Who’s going to be doing the importing? Unless we’ve unearthed a lost Atlantis of spendthrift consumers, it’s unlikely that exports will drive growth.

This pretty much leaves the government as the engine of last resort. Of course, this is why government spending is meant to climb as a portion of total GDP during recessions. However, investors are beginning to question whether the government’s “pump priming” will decline once the private sector regains its footing. Increasingly, investors are concluding that the Obama administration’s ambitions will drive deficits higher, and higher still.

25 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Marjorie C.

Liz:  I miss the rally!

Me too !!  A rally puts me in a shopping mood.  I love being able to fill up the shopping cart with whatever I want — now it’s back to asking, Do I really need it.  Bummer.

The stock market hates uncertainty. With all these changes in the wind, investors may well take the summer off.   Groan.  Seems the only ones smiling are the unions, they put the money up and they’re getting payed off.

Good article.  You make the related events easy to understand.

By Marjorie C. on 05/15/2009 3:38 pm
Liz Peek
Thanks Marjorie!You hit on a BIG problem - there are so many things that many of us have been buying that we DON’T need - bummer indeed. It was certainly more fun not worrying about that whole concept. Hang in there! Best - Liz
By Liz Peek on 05/17/2009 2:58 pm
Chrome Toe
Liz… would you PLEASE cheer me up lol…
By Chrome Toe on 05/16/2009 10:33 am
Liz Peek
Hi Chrome Toe (and what does that mean exactly?) I’d love to cheer you up- but am glad you weren’t at a dinner I attended last night - a gloomy group indeed. Everyone was asking a former Treasury guy what he thought and his pessimism was shocking. He feels the losses predicted by the stress test are going to be surpassed- if he’s right investors will panic about the banks all over again. He was also saying that the Obama administration is going out of their way not to hire practitioners whoactually understand these markets they are trying to regulate- they HATE Wall Street so. That does not bode well for these various programs’ success. Stay tuned - and try to stay cheerful! Best - Liz
By Liz Peek on 05/17/2009 3:02 pm
Liz Peek
Oops - I forgot I was supposed to cheer you up!
By Liz Peek on 05/17/2009 3:03 pm
Frannie Em

Liz

The administration hired Geithner, and he is from Wall Street.  Some days I am glad he is there, and other days I think what have we done?  Will we be living through one inflexion point after another in a never ending story or learning how to govern? 

By Frannie Em on 05/17/2009 6:57 pm
Liz Peek
Hi Frannie Em- Geithner was actually head of the New York Fed, and tho he worked closely with Wall Street firms is a gov man through and through. What I was referencing was that they put out new regs on derivatives without talking to a single derivatives trader, according to those in the know; they submitted new regs for mortgage products without consulting a single investor in such products, etc. their response? "We don’t want to look like we’re cozying up to Wall Street." It’s all about the optics- Americans deserve better, in my view. Thanks for weighing in- Liz
By Liz Peek on 05/17/2009 8:21 pm
Frannie Em
Is that like asking someone who can hammer a nail to to fix a Strativarius?  I wish those advisors would get real and live in the real world with the rest of us, instead of trying to create an alternate universe of their own.
By Frannie Em on 05/17/2009 8:52 pm
Liz Peek
Yes- now you’re talking! This administration is chock full of academics and theorists but not a business practitioner in the lot. Last week Obama’s team told Bank of America to get some people on their board who knew womething about banking! Talk about the pot and the kettle!
By Liz Peek on 05/17/2009 8:55 pm
Chrome Toe
If I HAD a Christmas card list Liz….you would soooo be off of it lol.. 
By Chrome Toe on 05/17/2009 10:45 pm
Frannie Em

Hey Chromie

Just keep doing what you do and as we all one by one hold the economy together, and if they can do something about fair regulation, or enforcing current regulations, maybe the administration can come to some kind of understanding with Wall Street.  I figure it is just keep putting one foot in front of the other and sooner or later we will get somewhere. 

By Frannie Em on 05/17/2009 7:05 pm
Chrome Toe

Well miss Em… I’m certainly doing my part to contribute to the economy :)

By Chrome Toe on 05/17/2009 10:46 pm
Frannie Em
yes I have been trying to go out and stimulate it by buying a few new summer frocks.  Paying my bills on time and doing the general this and that.
By Frannie Em on 05/17/2009 11:59 pm
Lily Rose

My friend Liz, isn’t the stock market generally quite predictably a poor performer in the summer time?

Namaste.

By Lily Rose on 05/16/2009 10:52 am
Liz Peek
Dear Lily Rose - I’ve been thinking about your questopn - and I don’t know the answer. I don’t really think the market is always a good predictor for a few months out, but rather anticipates inflection points. There are some seasonal truisms - like October being a cruel month- how can that be? My brithday’s in October for heaven’s sake! 
By Liz Peek on 05/17/2009 8:24 pm