Senator Roland Burris | 05/27/2009 8:20 am
Roland Burris: Image of Impropriety?

In the days leading up to his senatorial nomination, Roland Burris assured the Supreme Court that there was "no illegality" in Gov. Rod Blagojevich appointing him. Blagojevich, of course, was in hot water for allegedly trying to sell the seat, a space previously occupied by President Barack Obama.
Many were skeptical of Burris’s assertion, but, in the end, he was confirmed and seemed free and clear of Blago’s scandalous web. Those days are over. The FBI yesterday released a transcript of Burris talking with Blagojevich’s brother, Rob, and, in that conversation, Burris suggests sending the governor a personal check. Says Burris, "I know I could give him a check… myself." He also floated the idea of having a fund-raiser or sending money to the Friends of Blagojevich, which raised money for the impeached governor’s election campaign. None of this came up during his confirmation process.
Those remarks don’t necessarily mean Burris did anything improper. He never sent the money, a move he admitted in the call would look bad, and says he could "catch hell" if anything improper came to light. At one point, Burris remarks, "I’m in a dilemma right now, wanting to help the governor.” Burris will no doubt be "catching hell" over the next few weeks, especially as Blago goes to trial. One can’t help but wonder what this means. Does it mean that Burris operated sans scruples? That he bought his Senate seat? Not according to the evidence at hand.
So, should he be booted simply for suggesting impropriety? If that’s the case, what about politicians who take big donations from companies and then work for their interest? Is that just as unethical? Or is it more unethical to "buy" a political appointment? Has Burris shown his true colors as a picture-perfect liar or was he simply playing politics? What say you, reader? Should Burris be penalized for something he thought of doing but did not, as far as we know, accomplish?























14 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
It’s time to take the Chicago Express home! Load em’ up - don’t forget Rahm E. — that guy gives me the shivers. Burris is in this up to his neck.
"Yet somehow our young President rose, at a near meteoric pace from the muck of Chi-Town politics… with Rahm Emmanel at his side".
Rahm Emmanuel has been around long before Obama arrived on the political scene . In November, 2003, he was one of two Jewish House members to cosponsor a resolution to support the Geneva Accord. Ten years before that, he was a domestic counselor to Bill Clinton. It was Emmanuel who was the driving force behind the now famous handshake between Arafat and Rabin. Right now, he is the key player in the Netanyahu/Obama talks.
Let’s not forget that most of the world thinks Tel Aviv is the US capitol city.