Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Conversation | 08/24/2009 11:00 pm

Sarah Palin and the Celebrity of Politics

Joni Evans, Judith Martin, Liz Smith and Mary Wells talk about a new breed of celebrities, Palin’s political future and more in the wOw Conversation.
© Shutterstock

LIZ: Do you know there’s no celebrity news to speak of? That’s why Michael Jackson’s death was such a big event while it lasted. The new celebrity is politics. Politics is all people really are talking about, in my opinion.

JUDITH: Ah, you’ve finally come around to the Washington point of view.

LIZ: Exactly.

MARY: Well, society’s disappeared …

LIZ: The new celebrities, the performing celebrities, are mostly people nobody over 40 ever heard of, and we haven’t gotten used to them yet. And none of them are great stars or great characters in the tradition of the MGM days.

MARY: No. They’re all gone.

JONI: Well, at least we have Sarah Palin. Will she be a politician one year from now?

LIZ: Well she won’t be an Alaskan anymore. That’s what I predict. I mean, I think she’s about to shake the ice off of her feet. I think she’ll still be a name, because for one thing she’s physically very pretty and attractive; and she’s either irritating to people or they’re slavishly addicted to her. So she’s got all of the ingredients necessary to become a fixture.

I think she's formidable. I think she has time now to educate herself, and I wouldn't rule her out on anything.

MARY: Also, the Democrats are being very smart about her. They are pushing her. They are driving her to the top of the charts. They are literally making her a much bigger star than she is, because they want her to stand for Republicanism, and they want everybody to associate her with Republicanism.

LIZ: Judith, what do you think?

JUDITH: A star, but not a star politician. She made a lot of enemies in her own party and I think Mary’s quite right. She’s the ideal opponent to run against because she is extremely accident-prone in the intellectual department.

MARY: She’s perfect.

JUDITH: But she’s made enormous enemies in her own party.

MARY: She could literally drown the Republican Party in the next 12 months, little by little.

JUDITH: It will be interesting to see if people take her up on her offer to campaign for them. I would think that they would run away.

LIZ: Well, she spoke at the Reagan Library recently. I think she’s just starting out.

JONI: I just wanted to say that I think everyone has underestimated what she’s going to be one year from now, and I think she’s formidable. I think she has time now to educate herself, and I wouldn’t rule her out on anything.

LIZ: We ruled Nixon out and that was a big mistake, because he appealed to that whole victimhood thing on people who feel they’re so badly used. That’s her theory. She is preaching the doctrine of cultural resentment. And these days lots of people suffer from that. They enjoy being victims.

MARY: I think there’s a crazy streak in her. And I think she’ll be forgiven anything because everybody likes the way it’s going.

LIZ: She’s fun. In a world without any big names anymore, except big political names, she’s getting bigger all the time.

MARY: And an awful lot of big-time people are crazy.

JONI: Now, with Walter Cronkite gone … I remember the way the media used to be. We’ll miss Walter Cronkite and his authoritative ways.

LIZ: He never made the kind of mistakes Alessandra Stanley made in The New York Timeswhen she wrote about him in her appreciation and made seven glaring errors. I think I would have been fired if that had been me writing that. And I was fired and I didn’t even write anything like that. You know, that comic guy, Bill Maher, said it best. He said, "People have forgotten that when Walter Cronkite was doing the news, the news was a loss leader in television." The news wasn’t expected to make any money. So if he wanted to really cover some story substantially he did, and he didn’t have producers screaming and saying, "Don’t do that. You’ve got to make money. You’ve got to put Farrah Fawcett-Majors on."

427 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Wendy R
Well I view Palin kinda like I view Spencer and Heidi Prat amusing at times, but lacking in intelligence. I feel like we should go the way E news did with Speidi and refuse to talk about her until she does something worthy of talking about. Just my opinion.
By Wendy R on 08/25/2009 3:30 pm
EKA -

Blah, Blah, Blah … I thought maybe wowOwow had finally given up on the political threads, but no, and here we go again. I guess the number of posts are important for Ad revenue. 

People, there will be no agreeing or changing of minds anymore, we are a fractured society with most people coming down on one side or the other totally predicted by your media choice - do you get your news from Fox, or do you get your news from one of the other outlets, case closed. You are coming to every issue with a totally different set of "Facts", both convinced that you have the truth on your side, neither willing to see a middle ground. 

 It is becoming tedious, predictable and boring : Sarah Palin is a breath of fresh female power / Obama is a corrupted fraud OR Sarah Palin is an imbecilic pretty face quitter / Obama is a savior. It is not worth the air it takes to make an argument. 

Politics today is totally based on power, who has it and who wants it, and the money it takes to get it. We are a nation of simple minded moronic lemmings, believing whatever suits our personality. God help us. 

By EKA - on 08/25/2009 3:38 pm
bruce bellingham

I did not know that Sarah Palin did not speak at the Reagan Library. Perhaps she became lost in the Death Panel stacks in search of an old volume by Elizabeth Kübler Ross. I, too, should be more au courant. This is what I get for simply settling for being entime. That is a French word, isn’t it?

By bruce bellingham on 08/25/2009 3:53 pm
S.J. Morgan

They wanted her to appear since she draws a huge crowd when she does and they generate more ticket sales.  She stayed home with her family instead.  Since she was still the Govenor had she gone she would have generated another frivilous ethics complaint about how she was not doing her JOB and mroe cost to the state and her pockebook for her attorney. And the ignornat still wonder why she resigned????? duh..talk about lack of intelligence. She ould have been STUPID to continue.

Those that thought she should continue to hold her position at the tune of $33k per month should have donated to her legal fund..but then the creation of that fund  would by some considered be yet  another friviouls complaint she is defending that she has been found innocent of.

 

By S.J. Morgan on 08/25/2009 4:04 pm
S G
It amazes me how you take a beauty queen with no brains and put her on the repub ticket and omg its love. Her stupidity actually endears the right wing religious to her.What a sick group of people. She helped originate the hate and lies. I guess that is their core values now. Half term Sarah will never make it to the white house.
By S G on 08/25/2009 4:31 pm
Lady Gator
It amazes me how you take a "Community Organizer" with no common sense and put him on the Demo ticket and OMG it’s sheer, freaking adulation.  Endears the left wing to wee wee in their pants.  What a different group of people!  He has helped to take this country into outrageous debt, has totally ignored his campaign promises, but yet they still worship at his throne.  I guess that they have no core values.  One term Obama - he made it to the White House — now it’s back to Chicago — guess he’ll write another book - probably blame it all on Nancy Pelosi!
By Lady Gator on 08/25/2009 7:54 pm
deber B
Lady Gator, it will be blamed on "racism."    His campaign was so well orchestrated, lots of money backing this community organizer.   All will come out soon.   It is beginning to seep out now.   Again, Obama is just an ordinary man in extraordinary times.   Had he arrived with some semblance of past experience such as a Mayor or a Governor, he might’ve made it to the finish line.   However, in his first 100 days he spent $11 trillion.   Now, at 8 months we are looking at $15 trillion.   And, if you will indulge me for a moment, Lady Gator, just what was this administration accomplished so far?   Hopefully I’ve missed something.  : )
By deber B on 08/26/2009 5:43 am
Star Lawrence
I still want to know who this man is and how he got that 2004 speech and who is bankrolling this—they must be worried—and how the heck we go in this pickle!
By Star Lawrence on 08/30/2009 1:00 pm
DeBúrca obj
SG… why should that amaze you? The also ran and elected Reagan, Arnold and Sonny Bono.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/25/2009 9:20 pm
DeBúrca obj
typo: TheY
By DeBúrca obj on 08/25/2009 9:20 pm
deber B
Well, what more can you say about California?   They love their celebrities, don’t they?  : )
By deber B on 08/26/2009 5:45 am
DeBúrca obj
Republicans love their celebrities, don’t they.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/26/2009 6:29 pm
deber B

Well, if you look at the "celebrities" in Hollywood who backed Obama it would seem we have an even playing field.   The only significant person whoever came out of Hollywood was our dear Ronald Reagan….may he rest in peace.

By deber B on 08/26/2009 7:17 pm
S G
True.
By S G on 08/26/2009 8:46 am
Emcye Edwards

Yesterday, I was standing in line behind frenzied school-supply shoppers at a big store. I dutifully thumbed through the popular "movie magazines" as we inched our way up to the check-out counter. You’re sure right. How unsatisfying - how flatly unimpressive celebrity-dom has become, inching along in a consumer stupor. The boyfriend bingo, fashion feuds, the weight-based spirituality. Something mighty is missing. Dignity is the heart of glamor - and goggles ain’t glamor. It’s impossible to even wonder about these people; buried, beyond, beneath banal. 

And yet, contrary to how it all seems, so many in show biz have herculean ambition, raw talent, big love and great heapings of luck (which they are often acutely aware of  - and motivated by, to contribute societally. That’s why entertainment is fusing with politics, nowadays.)

As people, they celebrities cannot all be as pathos-free as today’s 24-year old entertainment editors make them sound. Surely, this lack of depth is a product of juvenile editorial direction.

Dear Hollywood: These are times when it’s more important to be useful than youthful.

Who forgot - this city was built by storytellers?

Just imagine our new Hollywood gatekeepers as film critics - taking the place of a Siskel, Ebert, Haskell, Corliss, Shickel, Turan, Rich, Reed, Mankiewicz, Travers, Christ, Taubin, etc…  The Birth of a Nation - Check out those Friggin’ Awesome Jump Cuts!

Gossip and entertainment media coverage is a form of cultural commentary. There are still plenty of rich, nutritious ingredients lying all over the kitchen; let the really experienced chefs have at them - to whip up some flavor and human interest!         That’s why I think Liz and some of her peers should be paid to take a crack at a new/old celeb-culture format. To riff off their memories, interject context with references from history, literature, philosophy, the arts and their own amazing personal encounters. Cable, streaming web content, Sirius Radio - I’d pay for it.  Wouldn’t that be entertaining and stimulating for a change?

As Bonnie Raitt reminds us, "It ain’t the meat, it’s the motion."  

By Emcye Edwards on 08/25/2009 6:09 pm