Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Conversation | 08/24/2009 11:00 pm

Sarah Palin and the Celebrity of Politics

Joni Evans, Judith Martin, Liz Smith and Mary Wells talk about a new breed of celebrities, Palin’s political future and more in the wOw Conversation.
© Shutterstock

LIZ: Do you know there’s no celebrity news to speak of? That’s why Michael Jackson’s death was such a big event while it lasted. The new celebrity is politics. Politics is all people really are talking about, in my opinion.

JUDITH: Ah, you’ve finally come around to the Washington point of view.

LIZ: Exactly.

MARY: Well, society’s disappeared …

LIZ: The new celebrities, the performing celebrities, are mostly people nobody over 40 ever heard of, and we haven’t gotten used to them yet. And none of them are great stars or great characters in the tradition of the MGM days.

MARY: No. They’re all gone.

JONI: Well, at least we have Sarah Palin. Will she be a politician one year from now?

LIZ: Well she won’t be an Alaskan anymore. That’s what I predict. I mean, I think she’s about to shake the ice off of her feet. I think she’ll still be a name, because for one thing she’s physically very pretty and attractive; and she’s either irritating to people or they’re slavishly addicted to her. So she’s got all of the ingredients necessary to become a fixture.

I think she's formidable. I think she has time now to educate herself, and I wouldn't rule her out on anything.

MARY: Also, the Democrats are being very smart about her. They are pushing her. They are driving her to the top of the charts. They are literally making her a much bigger star than she is, because they want her to stand for Republicanism, and they want everybody to associate her with Republicanism.

LIZ: Judith, what do you think?

JUDITH: A star, but not a star politician. She made a lot of enemies in her own party and I think Mary’s quite right. She’s the ideal opponent to run against because she is extremely accident-prone in the intellectual department.

MARY: She’s perfect.

JUDITH: But she’s made enormous enemies in her own party.

MARY: She could literally drown the Republican Party in the next 12 months, little by little.

JUDITH: It will be interesting to see if people take her up on her offer to campaign for them. I would think that they would run away.

LIZ: Well, she spoke at the Reagan Library recently. I think she’s just starting out.

JONI: I just wanted to say that I think everyone has underestimated what she’s going to be one year from now, and I think she’s formidable. I think she has time now to educate herself, and I wouldn’t rule her out on anything.

LIZ: We ruled Nixon out and that was a big mistake, because he appealed to that whole victimhood thing on people who feel they’re so badly used. That’s her theory. She is preaching the doctrine of cultural resentment. And these days lots of people suffer from that. They enjoy being victims.

MARY: I think there’s a crazy streak in her. And I think she’ll be forgiven anything because everybody likes the way it’s going.

LIZ: She’s fun. In a world without any big names anymore, except big political names, she’s getting bigger all the time.

MARY: And an awful lot of big-time people are crazy.

JONI: Now, with Walter Cronkite gone … I remember the way the media used to be. We’ll miss Walter Cronkite and his authoritative ways.

LIZ: He never made the kind of mistakes Alessandra Stanley made in The New York Timeswhen she wrote about him in her appreciation and made seven glaring errors. I think I would have been fired if that had been me writing that. And I was fired and I didn’t even write anything like that. You know, that comic guy, Bill Maher, said it best. He said, "People have forgotten that when Walter Cronkite was doing the news, the news was a loss leader in television." The news wasn’t expected to make any money. So if he wanted to really cover some story substantially he did, and he didn’t have producers screaming and saying, "Don’t do that. You’ve got to make money. You’ve got to put Farrah Fawcett-Majors on."

427 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Star Lawrence
Yes—I remember this site always had a lot of self-styled shrinks.
By Star Lawrence on 08/30/2009 12:32 pm
Chris Glass`
Are politics the new celebrity? It appears to be so with all the political scandals from coast to coast. More than one politician is getting fame not asked for in the revelation of personal scandals. In the process we are trading truth for window dressing. Genuine time with constituents has been swapped for photo ops. Money waving lobbyists can catch the eye and vote of many politicians padding their retirement accounts.  I’d settle for a lot less celebrity and more accountability.
By Chris Glass` on 08/25/2009 4:44 am
Frannie Em

Great post.  I think the ladies of Wow have made an important point about celebrity..  I say lets stop the money from special interests so that congress works for us.  

Like you, I would be grateful for less celebrity and more accountability.  Who knows, maybe the glaring spot light will make them more accountable.  I don’t mind seeing them nervous - but I would rather see more integrity.  Isn’t it funny that no one ever mentions integrity when we talk about our congress and senate.  I am sure there are those there that have it, but it stopped being a requirement for office a long time ago. 

By Frannie Em on 08/25/2009 11:21 am
Marjorie C.

 Liz:  She is preaching the doctrine of cultural resentment. And these days lots of people suffer from that. They enjoy being victims.

I believe the wOw ladies are out of touch on this one.  If there is any cultural resentment, the Dems are just as guilty of it.  And as for victims, well…  let me remind you that the race card has been used ad nauseum in the past year.

Sarah Palin is a Republican with a POV.  That is as much as I see in her.  I don’t think she should be demonized.  As for being slavishly addicted, that sounds like something an Obama fan would be.     

By Marjorie C. on 08/25/2009 4:45 am
Elle Troy

I think that the Wow ladies are out of touch with this one too.  They keep trying to entertain Sarah Palin as a serious heavyweight contender for President, and she’s not.  She couldn’t handle governing the least-populated state in the union, so she quit.  How would she ever handle an entire country of over 300 million?  She wouldn’t.

 And stop whining about victimization, Marjorie.  Boo-hoo, okay?

By Elle Troy on 08/25/2009 5:38 am
Marjorie C.

Elle:   And stop whining about victimization, …

As an Independent voter, I don’t feel victimized at all.  In the next election, I’ll step away from my usual pattern and vote for the party and not the person…  that party will be the Republicans, any Republican that can break up the ridiculous majority we have now.  What a mess !!   What a debt !! 

If Sarah Palin runs for any office, she has my vote.  She certainly could do no worse than what we have now.    

By Marjorie C. on 08/25/2009 6:06 am
deber B

Well stated, Marjorie C!!!!    This country’s "independents" are key in the next election.   This morning I heard that the older generation is now pulling away from supporting Obama and his administration.   I also heard that the 19 to 29 age group are also backing away.    Looks like a percentage of those who voted for Obama are waning and this is directly related to his inability to stimulate the economy to save their jobs and healthcare concerns of the elderly.   This is not going the way Obama and his czars imagined it would.   So, people like Sarah Palin now become more and more important to the republican party.  After all, we are a conservative country.   That hasn’t changed.   We need voices like Sarah Palin’s to get Americans back to the reality that our great nation is being mismanaged by arrogance and left leaning ideals.   Bad combination as the polls support.

I would offer you a tissue, Marjorie, but somehow I don’t think you need one.   : )

By deber B on 08/25/2009 7:37 am
Lisa B

I also heard that the 19 to 29 age group are also backing away.

Last November, my lovely and smart nineteen-year old daughter, announced she was voting for Obama…  I wasn’t suprised at all, considering she is attending UCLA I didn’t expect anything other than a vote for a democrat.  I asked her what she felt was the most compelling reason for her decision.  Her answer?  "Change, mama, we need change."  Okaaaaaaaaay…  So - last week I asked her what she thought about the healthcare bill.  "Uh, I don’t really think about that kind of thing."  Once again I am treated to a teaching opportunity…  I read an article yesterday about the 19 - 29 demographic.  It’s going to get real interesting, isn’t it?  

By Lisa B on 08/25/2009 3:34 pm
deber B
Oh, my, Lisa, I know exactly what you are feeling and thinking.   These liberal universities!!   You are correct in the 19 to 29 demographic.   I believe they exercised their "feel good" vote and they are no longer interested in the outcome.   As a republican parent, I’m listening with great interest at the questions my grown children are asking…as their move closer and closer to mirroring their republican upbringing of "personal responsibility."    Now that it is "their" taxes they are beginning to pay closer attention.
By deber B on 08/25/2009 5:10 pm
Star Lawrence
My sister said about the same thing to me the other day—well, I was never that interested in politics—well, she sure said I was stupid, Palin was stupid and other names, Obama was a god, etc…now…well, lost interest. Her husband is a Republican. She won’t look into this—just says there is something wrong with us. It’s easier for her.
By Star Lawrence on 08/30/2009 12:35 pm
Barbara
Wait Marjorie.  Just use facts as your basis.  What a debt?  The present administration did not create the debt.  The Bush administration came in with a surplus and spent it all, putting the country into massive debt.  Certainly the current congress continues to spend, perhaps on different things trying to get us out of a recession, but do not blame the debt on dems.  The republicans had the presidency, house and senate and I didn’t see them fix things.
By Barbara on 08/26/2009 10:25 am
Leigh Hart

Barbara,

The present administration has created new debt the likes of which have never been seen in this country before. Obama’s debt for 2009 is more than all four years of the Bush presidency. Obama and the Democrat majority own this debt. Spin it anyone you like, but the numbers speak for themselves.

By Leigh Hart on 08/27/2009 1:45 am
T P

Marjorie-

Palin has my vote-now and forever. She is my Howard Roarke. I have a feeling that Ann Richards would back her up and I loved Ann Richards. Take care. 

 

By T P on 09/05/2009 1:10 pm
Susan Crawford

You raise a valid point here, Marjorie. Politics has become such a cynical business these days, whether coming from the right, the left, or the center. It is so media-driven, so tied in to special interests, and so apt to pander to all kinds of cultural biases and stereotypes. Having any kind of political discussion often ends up in folks pulling out all kinds of cards to play: race, gender, economics, class, victimhood … I could go on, but why bother?

I think it would be a huge mistake to count Sarah Palin out of the picture, or to set her up as a stalking horse for the downfall of the Republican party. If she has a way to go in learning the ropes of politics in this day and age - believe me, she’ll be taught, and taught well. There ARE people who are slavishly addicted to her, and to Obama, all right. And that’s just what I’d like to discourage. And I’d love to see the level of political discussion start to rise above the deck of cards that passes for policy and philosophy, wouldn’t you? I wonder what it would take to make that happen?

 

By Susan Crawford on 08/25/2009 11:04 am
Marjorie C.

Susan:   I wonder what it would take to make that happen?

Maybe the one thing good that will come out of this past election will be to make people aware how bad it can get when candidates buy elections through the media.  Whatever happened to the Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (McCain-Feingold)?   Remove the money and the glitz and glamour of pop-star status, then maybe candidates can debate the issues.  Instead, we had someone like Obama continually responding with, "What she said" in debates.  He never understood the issues and road on the coattails of Hillary as much as he could, and he had the money to quiet the media from asking any tough questions. 

Now we have what we have, a president who says, "What they (congress) said", and voters have lost all confidence in him.  But, he still has his staunch followers, and might always have, they just might not be enough to get him elected again.  That will be a good day for America.   

By Marjorie C. on 08/25/2009 12:42 pm