Conversation | 08/24/2009 11:00 pm
Sarah Palin and the Celebrity of Politics

LIZ: Do you know there’s no celebrity news to speak of? That’s why Michael Jackson’s death was such a big event while it lasted. The new celebrity is politics. Politics is all people really are talking about, in my opinion.
JUDITH: Ah, you’ve finally come around to the Washington point of view.
LIZ: Exactly.
MARY: Well, society’s disappeared …
LIZ: The new celebrities, the performing celebrities, are mostly people nobody over 40 ever heard of, and we haven’t gotten used to them yet. And none of them are great stars or great characters in the tradition of the MGM days.
MARY: No. They’re all gone.
JONI: Well, at least we have Sarah Palin. Will she be a politician one year from now?
LIZ: Well she won’t be an Alaskan anymore. That’s what I predict. I mean, I think she’s about to shake the ice off of her feet. I think she’ll still be a name, because for one thing she’s physically very pretty and attractive; and she’s either irritating to people or they’re slavishly addicted to her. So she’s got all of the ingredients necessary to become a fixture.
| I think she's formidable. I think she has time now to educate herself, and I wouldn't rule her out on anything. |
MARY: Also, the Democrats are being very smart about her. They are pushing her. They are driving her to the top of the charts. They are literally making her a much bigger star than she is, because they want her to stand for Republicanism, and they want everybody to associate her with Republicanism.
LIZ: Judith, what do you think?
JUDITH: A star, but not a star politician. She made a lot of enemies in her own party and I think Mary’s quite right. She’s the ideal opponent to run against because she is extremely accident-prone in the intellectual department.
MARY: She’s perfect.
JUDITH: But she’s made enormous enemies in her own party.
MARY: She could literally drown the Republican Party in the next 12 months, little by little.
JUDITH: It will be interesting to see if people take her up on her offer to campaign for them. I would think that they would run away.
LIZ: Well, she spoke at the Reagan Library recently. I think she’s just starting out.
JONI: I just wanted to say that I think everyone has underestimated what she’s going to be one year from now, and I think she’s formidable. I think she has time now to educate herself, and I wouldn’t rule her out on anything.
LIZ: We ruled Nixon out and that was a big mistake, because he appealed to that whole victimhood thing on people who feel they’re so badly used. That’s her theory. She is preaching the doctrine of cultural resentment. And these days lots of people suffer from that. They enjoy being victims.
MARY: I think there’s a crazy streak in her. And I think she’ll be forgiven anything because everybody likes the way it’s going.
LIZ: She’s fun. In a world without any big names anymore, except big political names, she’s getting bigger all the time.
MARY: And an awful lot of big-time people are crazy.
JONI: Now, with Walter Cronkite gone … I remember the way the media used to be. We’ll miss Walter Cronkite and his authoritative ways.
LIZ: He never made the kind of mistakes Alessandra Stanley made in The New York Timeswhen she wrote about him in her appreciation and made seven glaring errors. I think I would have been fired if that had been me writing that. And I was fired and I didn’t even write anything like that. You know, that comic guy, Bill Maher, said it best. He said, "People have forgotten that when Walter Cronkite was doing the news, the news was a loss leader in television." The news wasn’t expected to make any money. So if he wanted to really cover some story substantially he did, and he didn’t have producers screaming and saying, "Don’t do that. You’ve got to make money. You’ve got to put Farrah Fawcett-Majors on."























427 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Pat Cadell, former Democrat pollster, said the Democrats have made government the enemy of the people.
I would interject the words ‘tax-paying’ before people in Mr. Cadell’s quote.
‘The scariest words in the english language, "I am from the Government, and I am here to help."’ Ronald Wilson Reagan.
Here’s the link to Glenn Beck’s expose yesterday on Green jobs czar Vann Jones, self-proclaimed communist. Vann’s own words are shocking:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOgmwyfKuL8
Most were not sponsors to begin with,,,,," His latest assault on Jones came as Color of Change announced that it has secured commitments from 36 companies who have pledged not to advertise on Beck’s popular program, including Wal-Mart and Sprint. However, some of the companies never had a presence on "Glenn Beck." Representatives of Procter & Gamble and AT&T – listed by Color of Change as companies that had signed onto the boycott – told The Times that their companies did not run spots on Beck’s program to begin with."
"The flap that ensued did not appear to dampen Beck’s viewership. This month, his show has averaged 2.25 million viewers, 99% more than tuned in during the same period last year, when the network aired “America’s Election HQ” during the time period. And his ratings are up from July, when Beck’s program averaged 2.05 million viewers. Fan websites such as Defend Glenn have called for viewers to fight back against the advertising boycott, and some media veterans have denounced the tactic as a suppression of free speech."
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2009/08/glenn-beck-ignores-ad-boycott.html
Deburca — It seems the left wing group’s effort to intimidate corporate advertisers on Fox News’ Glenn Beck show appears to be backfiring - instead, it triggered a wave of support from those pesky grass roots folk who rushed to defend Beck from the attacks. Now, Beck’s fame seems to be growing - apparently more spontaneous. A nationwide effort has sprung up among fans to defend him. Appears the Web sites, Facebook groups, e-mail blasts and telephone calls have triggered the change with the advertisers.
And, although the left wing group had some success in the beginning, it now appears that it is making claims that don’t match the reply of the advertisers. Several major companies claim they never joined any boycott of Beck’s show.
And, New York Times author Peter Schweizer stated "Glenn Beck is to be congratulated," they only go after you when you are being effective - he must really be causing them problems."
So a reverse boycott is what’s taking place. So, he’s still on the air and his numbers are growing!
MONDAY, AUG. 24, 2009
FOXNEWS O’REILLY 3,440,000
FOXNEWS HANNITY 2,937,000
FOXNEWS BECK 2,810,000
FOXNEWS GRETA 2,450,000
FOXNEWS BAIER 2,066,000
FOXNEWS SHEP 1,860,000
MSNBC OLBERMANN 1,114,000
CNN KING 1,063,000
MSNBC MADDOW 885,000
CNN COOPER 827,000
MSNBC HARDBALL 640,0