Sarah Palin | 04/06/2009 10:00 am
Sarah Palin Strikes Back at Levi Johnston's Appearance on Tyra Banks Show

Levi Johnston’s appearance on Tyra Banks’ show today has, not surprisingly, drawn a harsh reply from Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, his former future mother-in-law.
While sitting on Tyra’s couch, Levi confesses that he’s "pretty sure" that Bristol’s mom knew there was hanky-panky going on between the teen couple, and that they practiced safe sex "most of the time." Levi’s sister also complains to Tyra that the Johnston family wasn’t allowed in the hospital when their child, Tripp was born, and she also complains that Levi was forced to go to the Republican convention when he would rather have been hunting. "It’s time we get that story out there," he said.
Getting that story out did not sit well with the Palin camp, whose family rep, Meghan Stapleton, released the following statement:
Bristol did not even know Levi was going on the show. We’re disappointed that Levi and his family, in a quest for fame, attention, and fortune, are engaging in flat-out lies, gross exaggeration, and even distortion of their relationship. Bristol’s focus will remain on raising Tripp, completing her education, and advocating abstinence. It is unfortunate that Levi finds it more appealing to exploit his previous relationship with Bristol than to contribute to the well-being of the child.
The statement ends, saying, "Bristol realizes now that she made a mistake in her relationship and is the one taking responsibility for their actions."
We are eager to see what the Hatfields, er the Johnstons, have to say to that.























215 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Bristol certainly did make more than one misteake..seems Levi is definately NOT the guy she thought he was!
I love Sarah Palin! As a mother and a grandmother, she voiced her disapproval of Levi putting tabloid information on national TV for the world to hear. He has cheapened himself in such a way that he appears to give the phrase "the scorned woman….which can now be "hell hath no fury as a scorned man."
Keep it up Levi so that your 15 minutes of fame will only appear in your scrap book.
How unfortunate for his son that his father has chosen the low road…a familiar road he frequents lately.
I know many last week were bashing Gov. Palin for letting them sleep in the same room….if anyone could believe that was even true is laughable….it was a flat out lie by Levi along with many of the things he and his family are telling tyra….he must have been given quite a check for his appearance…hopefully it will pay for the child support towards Tripp!!! And for him rather to be hunting….right….he loved all the spot light he received during the RNC, hunting was his least interest at the time….what a joke…and how sad this family is out to trash the Palin family who are caring for his son!
In the comments on this site, Gops have suggested that Obama is both a liberal socialist, a rightwing fascist and a terrorist sympathizer, that he has hidden his true identity, that he was not born in the United States, that he cheated his way through college and that he can’t speak without a teleprompter, even though he has spoken extemporaneously during hundreds of hours of town hall meetings during the campaign, the debates and, most recently, in France.
In the 1990s — egged on by the corporate media — Republicans wasted millions of taxpayer dollars investigating the Clintons, including even their cat, Socks. Ken Starr spent $60 million and all he came up with was perjury in a civil deposition in a lawsuit over something that happened before he was president. Clinton-bashing as pundits on MSNBC created the careers of Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham and the late Barbara Olson, all three of whom were unrestrained in their personal criticisms of the president and the first lady. Rush Limbaugh referred to Chelsea, age 13, as the "White House dog."
Liberals are slowly learning how to do what conservatives had made an art. It is not surprising conservatives don’t like it.
It is revisionist history to say that Bush bashing began on day one. Criticism of Dear Leader was verbotten until after Katrina. It got so bad that speaking negatively about Bush during the run up to the invasion of Iraq was labeled as anti-American. If you criticize Bush, liberals were told, it means you hate America.
If criticizing Bush was equivalent to hating America, what is criticizing Obama?
Rachel wish to have snarky conversations avoid starting them. No one said anything about the Palin situation until you characterized an ‘imaginary’ response from a *certain* group. Actually, no one knows the facts of the Palin/Johnson relationship or the fallout thereof, so I think it best that we all move along beyond the gossip and innuendo. Wouldn’t you agree?
Peace and grace