Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Wall Street Weekly | 10/09/2009 12:45 pm

Sinking Dollar Fair Warning to Obama, by Liz Peek

Image: WhiteHouse.gov

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 10/5) 

Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist.

The New York Times ran a story this week about the art that the Obamas have chosen for the walls of the White House. Featured in the piece was a painting by Ed Ruscha. The chosen canvas has a red background with the words "wait a minute," "maybe yes" and "maybe no" floating across the space. What an appropriate choice for our young president, who is suddenly irresolute about Afghanistan. Having once pronounced Kabul as central to the war on terror (oops! make that the Overseas Contingency Operation), the president is now angling for a Goldilocks position: not too little, not too much, responding to polls that show waning support for our activities in that desperate country.

President Obama is uncertain not only about our military options, but also – dangerously – about economic choices. He recently affirmed while addressing a Wall Street crowd that "I’ve always been a strong believer in the power of the free market." That was good to hear, because almost none of his proposed programs suggest a love affair with capitalism. Instead, he has offered up one measure after another that substitutes government fiat for market economics – most notably in autos, health care and energy. The newest entry is the proposed Consumer Financial Protection Agency whose czar will be empowered to decide on "the manner, settings and circumstances for the provision of any consumer financial products or services." Moreover, he has revved up his antitrust department, sanctioned pro-labor policies burdensome to American employers and started a trade war.

This litany of business-unfriendly stances is taking a toll, not only on the president’s popularity, but on the dollar. The dollar took a sizeable hit this week (and gold soared) when the Australians boosted their key interest rate, signaling a recovery in that country. While earlier this year global investors drove the dollar briefly higher in their quest for safety, they have since had second thoughts. The euro, for instance, has gained 18% in value compared to the dollar since March. You don’t have to read the tea leaves to find reasons to sell the dollar – you can simply delve into the budget projections.

To put things in perspective, note that budget deficits in the U.K. are about to sink the Labour Government. The IMF puts the U.K. budget deficit this year at 11.6% of GDP and at 13.2% next year. The net public debt of Great Britain is expected to amount to 92% of GDP in 2014, up from 58% today and 38%in 2007. (The Obamacare folks should note that the IMF has called for the U.K. to rein in their health-care program, a leading budget-breaker.) The Brits are alarmed about this state of affairs, which is why they are about to junk their existing government. David Cameron, the Tory leader most likely to take over as Prime Minister, has warned that the country is in for tough times – severe cuts in social spending and higher taxes. That is not the usual campaign rhetoric, but the country is looking the future square on, and does not like what it sees.

Here’s the sobering news for the U.S.: we’re not that far behind the U.K. Our budget deficit will total 12.5% of GDP this year according to the IMF, and our national debt will soar to 85% of GDP by 2014. These figures are spurring talk that the dollar will no longer be the world’s reserve currency and that oil producers may move to price their product eventually in a basket of currencies.

249 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Glenda Glynn
deber — Yes, Liz Peek makes us use our heads - makes us bring forth differing opinions.  So much more interesting than articles about "fluffy" things.  The "fluff" is nice and interesting, however, articles on the problems facing this country should be a topic that all of us need.  
By Glenda Glynn on 10/11/2009 3:27 pm
sibelle daubigne

Liz, I also laughed when i saw that Rusha’s painting going to the VH! Obama probably needs to contemplate it before he falls asleep!

What is not laughable is the sinking of the dollar while he contemplates himself some more in the mirror! 

By sibelle daubigne on 10/09/2009 1:47 pm
Frances England
I would just like to say that Maggie doesn’t have any thing to worry about regarding Obama making any hasty decisions about Afghanistan.  He is Way beyond that.  He has been sitting on those hands of his for way to long!  I believe he is back in campaign mode and doesn’t want to do anything to upset the Demo’s.  Meanwhile, our men and women are dying every day.  He must make a decision Now!  If that is pull out then he needs to bring our people home and if not then he must get off his butt and get more support troops over there immediately.  It is time for him to make at least One Decision his first year!! I do believe making tought decisions is in his job description!
By Frances England on 10/09/2009 2:38 pm
Maggie W

Frances, a war does not remain constant. Several events have happened in Afghanistan recently that alter military strategy.  First, the military went with a flawed plan that did not secure Khandahar.  Big mistake. Then, there was the disastrous presidential election there recently.  I’m sure you read about about it in the news.  Also, Al Quaeda has a new operative in how they gather intelligence, which has resuted in American deaths. 

So, while you may believe the President is "sitting on his hands", what has actually happened is a six month review stategy was necessary because of these recent events.  Part of that review is determining whether there is a need for a full counterinsurgency strategy; that, in part, will determine troop levels.   The only way, according to Defense officials, is to determine whether a government there committed to reform is even plausible. Can they be trusted?  

Having a six month review based on recent events is hardly " sitting on hands." 

 

By Maggie W on 10/09/2009 3:10 pm
canuck canuck
There is talk that he may now be willing to involve the Taliban in his decision making …. How soon we forget the poor woman who was murdered at the soccer match by the Taliban …. If they are allowed back into Afghanistan Maggie there will be a massacre the likes we have never seen as every Afghani who co-operated with America will be at risk - They WILL kill them as the Taliban is brutal and unforgiving though they professed to run that country by the Koran …. Do we not have enought blood on our hands as a country because we start things and do not finish them? When will we learn that we MUST NOT turn our backs on those people who have helped us and leave them to the dogs because we tire of the fight? No wonder the world hates us ….
By canuck canuck on 10/09/2009 3:21 pm
Maggie W

The following quote is from Taliban Maulvi Mohammed Haqqabi (Newsweek)…

" Two or three years ago, US soldiers in the region acted as if they were on holiday. They were taking videos and photos of themselves and walking in the mountains for fun. They played games in the open. Those days are over.  Now they are forced to keep their fingers on the trigger 24 hours a day.

Personally, I think all this talk about Al Queda being strong is US propaganda. As far as I know, they are weak and few in numbers . We control large amounts of territory. We should have a strict code for foreigners working with us. We can no longer allow these camels ( insult) to roam freely without bridles and control.

We are suffering fewer night raids by Americans because we jammed their cell phone transmissions.  I don’t think they have the intelligence they used to have. Fewer people are willing to cooperate with them now."

Based on this small piece of conversation , two things come to mind:  members of the Taliban have been cooperating in the past and it might be wise to continue to talk to certain members of the Taliban.  Keep in mind, we are not talking about Al Queda here. Talk with Taliban?  Not only is that possible, it is already a reality.  It’s been happening.  But I  seriously doubt Gen. Mc Chrystal will allow them in his inner council.

 

 

By Maggie W on 10/09/2009 3:59 pm
C jay

Canuck,  with little deep knowlege on Afghanistan, some things are very clear, and bear concern, in light of articles, and following comments, like Peek puts out.

The Taliban IS Afghanistan, something few Americans realize - not Al-Qaeda, but Taliban! The Afghans want the US out - they want their government OUT - they’ve been occupied far too long (a word no one wants to use since this started), but that’s the simple truth, however complex it is. The most dangerous parts of that country are in the capitol because no once can control the throngs making IEDs there (review the deaths). It’s a breeding ground for everything threatening our world — along with N. Korea, and Iran.

There is no allegiance to the Qu’ran there … ask any devout Muslim - just because someone is from the Middle East and proclaims Islam does not mean they adhere to Islamic Law - no more than our Christians do here and abroad (www.quran.org.uk ).

Articles like Peek puts out are all over the place like the ground tornadoes - to stir up dirt and harm — just not very intelligent, lacking respect, at best.

 "We are now far too clever to be able to survive without wisdom." ~ E F Schumacher
By C jay on 10/10/2009 8:48 am
deber B

C Jay, The Taliban is an extremist group in Afghanistan.   They have been harboring Al Qaeda.   They believe in what Al Qaeda is doing and supported 9/11.  Just look at the number of lives The Taliban have taken in Pakistan.   They are focused on getting their weapons of mass destruction.     With all due respect, C Jay, you are not privvy to intelligence information.   Like me, you are at the mercy of what you read, articles and opinions.   If you’ve read this in a book, well, you are reading the opinions of the author.  

I don’t like being in Afghanistan any more than you.   However, what else can we do?   During Obama’s campaign, he said Bush took his eye off the ball when he went into Iraq.  Obama said, "I will win this war in Afghanistan!"   What did he mean?  That he, too, would take his eye off the ball and give The Taliban a free pass?   There are many different religions in these countries.   That’s why they fight each other.   That will never change unless they are open to some semblance of a democracy where their citizens can feel safe and secure….where they can vote without having their hand cut off and where women aren’t treated like discardable animals.  

We are in Afghanistan for a reason.   We shouldn’t take our eye off of the very thing that the democrats blamed Bush for…this will be a political decision made by Obama.   That much is clear.   If he doesn’t send the troops get ready for both General McCrystal and Petraeus to resign…..immediately, as they should.

By deber B on 10/10/2009 1:33 pm
C jay
In Afghanistan there is the Taliban, and the extremist Taliban - check that out, Deber. It’s precisely what makes working with the people there a seriously challenge for the U.S. and was for Russia, as well. The people are tired of occupation, and they know more than anyone else in there - including the U.S. now. Our military leadership’s experience is not conducive to the situation, now - esp. MQ’s - however  apt he is - we need him in N. Korea!
By C jay on 10/10/2009 2:50 pm
C jay
I MEAN - working on the North Korean situation - that should have been address in 2001 at the latest!
By C jay on 10/10/2009 2:51 pm
deber B

C Jay, please read this article (it is lengthy) written by a democrat on Afghanistan:

By BOB KERREY

In a wonderfully stunning decision, the Nobel Committee in Oslo awarded our president its Peace Prize. They said the award was as much for the hope that he will contribute to a more peaceful world as it was for any specific accomplishment during his first nine months in office.

This is the same hope I had when I voted for President Barack Obama, contributed to him financially, and campaigned for him in a few states. I believed he could successfully manage the process of U.S. withdrawal from Iraq. I believed he would help build a bridge to the Muslim world. And I believed he would bring his unique story to inspire us to overcome our divisiveness. I still hold fast to these beliefs, in spite of the fact that his presidency already seems to have brought out the worst in some.

By awarding the prize to Mr. Obama, the Nobel committee also surely hoped to influence the debate about U.S. policy in Afghanistan. I wish they had waited until the debate was settled here at home. My wish is based on a fear that American political leaders are about to talk themselves into breaking yet another foreign policy commitment.

In December 2006, President George W. Bush was faced with a similarly difficult foreign policy decision. The Republicans had suffered tremendous losses in the November election, in part because of the conduct of the war in Iraq. At the time, the unpopular Republican president was being pressured by ascendant congressional Democrats and some members of his own party into withdrawing from Iraq. Failure in Iraq loomed, as public opinion for the effort to help the democratically elected government survive had faded thanks to a series of tactical blunders and inaccurate assessments of what would be needed to accomplish the mission.

Then, against all reasonable predictions, President Bush chose to increase rather than decrease our military commitment. The "surge," as it became known, worked. Victory was snatched from the jaws of defeat.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703746604574463012564519346.html

By deber B on 10/11/2009 6:15 am
canuck canuck

Your knowledge of Afghanistan, it’s people and the Taliban is absolutely wrong. That is all I have to say to you about your opinion. It is not based on fact but fiction.

By canuck canuck on 10/10/2009 4:26 pm
C jay
If nothing else, canuck, follow Richard Engel’s writings - his knowlege of Afghanistan you would understand - it’s not that difficult to grasp other than the complexities of the society there.
By C jay on 10/10/2009 5:48 pm
deber B
“…the white flag of the Taliban is raised above Kamdesh” By Michelle Malkin  •  October 9, 2009 02:39 PM

On the day of President Obama’s glorious Nobel Appease Prize victory, a Taliban henchman gloats in Afghanistan in the aftermath of the Kamdesh siege:

Speaking by telephone from an undisclosed location, Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid said the U.S. bombarded the outpost with airstrikes after leaving, as well as the local police headquarters.

“This means they are not coming back,” Mujahid said. “This is another victory for Taliban. We have control of another district in eastern Afghanistan.”

“Right now Kamdesh is under our control, and the white flag of the Taliban is raised above Kamdesh,” Mujahid said.

A senior official of the Nuristan provincial government confirmed Taliban forces were in control of the village and Afghan police and soldiers had withdrawn from the district. He spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject.

Provincial police chief, Gen. Mohammad Qasim Jangulbagh, said the pullout “has had a direct affect on the morale of Afghan forces.”

“If Afghan soldiers are losing support, how can they stay there?” he asked. “We need the coalition to send their forces back. We need more police, more soldiers.”

The battle marked the largest loss of U.S. life in a single skirmish in more than a year. Besides the eight Americans slain, three Afghan soldiers and an estimated 100 insurgents died, according to NA.

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/09/the-white-flag-of-the-taliban-is-raised-above-kamdesh/

By deber B on 10/11/2009 6:11 am
Ro H

Maggie W

Isn’t it nice to finally have a President who actually thinks things through before acting?

By Ro H on 10/12/2009 6:34 am