Margo Howard | 08/16/2009 11:00 pm
So Many Books (So Few Writers), by Margo Howard
Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the
family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as
Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature
provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Margo’s advice column, Dear Margo, appears twice a week — on Thursdays and Fridays — on wowOwow.com.
Thanks to Bob Barnett, Esq., agent extraordinaire, a whole lotta books by politicians will be coming out. As it happens, the "authors" are Republicans – perhaps because they are out of office. (Disclosure: Barnett is my friend and agent … and I’m not even a politician.) The thing is, the upcoming political memoirists are not writers. What most of them are are talkers. Really, they should talk a book, not write one, and I don’t mean on tape. This suggests a whole new art form … kind of a long Barbara Walters Special, but not necessarily with Barbara Walters. This approach would of course leave out the middle man, the writer, letting the participles dangle where they may.
Dick Cheney’s book will be out in 2011. I do not know what to make of that delay, unless he really is serious about that statute of limitations he has referred to. He says it’s the statute on keeping secrets, but I want to check if it is perhaps a statute having something to do with the World Court and The Hague. In any case, as the leaks would have it, his main point is to tell us that W "went soft" during Bush 2. That is, he wasn’t so fast to take Cheney’s advice; that he became "malleable" to public opinion. A real man, I guess, should not be responsive to the citizens that elected him. Another way to look at this, say, from Bush’s perspective, is that he caught on that Cheney’s advice was edging him toward being considered the worst president in history, and therefore began to ignore the directives, I mean, advice. I guess my idea is that instead of Cheney explaining all this to a writer, he should just go on television and tell us.
One oddity is that a book, involving a middle man, will net Cheney seven figures or, God forbid, eight. A television show, one on one – a more direct report, to be sure – would net him … zero. Another thing about a book: You can’t question the author, or perhaps point out a fiction, should there happen to be one. There’s an upside, however, to Cheney’s forthcoming book. Since he will be registering his "disappointment" with Bush, you can pretty well be sure there will be a response from W’s partisans, so we can at least look forward to a catfight at the Crawford Corral.
Then there’s Karl Rove’s book to look forward to. I suspect this will be about his sad childhood cum apologia for his actions while manipulating, I mean serving the president.
The big whoop book I suspect will be Sarah Palin’s. I hope the writer preserves some of Ms. Palin’s syntax and that there are lots of pictures. I found it interesting that her book was sold to the imprint of HarperCollins that publishes Christian literature … which is not to say that Jews and Muslims will not give it a whirl. If they’ve not selected a title yet, I would suggest The Lame Duck Lives to See Another Day.
So get out your reading glasses, kids. Before you know it we will be hearing from two people who gave us the last eight years, and a third who was awfully good looking. (And could shoot wolves from planes, to boot.) Will these books be provocative? You betcha.
Thanks to Bob Barnett, Esq., agent extraordinaire, a whole lotta books by politicians will be coming out. As it happens, the "authors" are Republicans – perhaps because they are out of office. (Disclosure: Barnett is my friend and agent … and I’m not even a politician.) The thing is, the upcoming political memoirists are not writers. What most of them are are talkers. Really, they should talk a book, not write one, and I don’t mean on tape. This suggests a whole new art form … kind of a long Barbara Walters Special, but not necessarily with Barbara Walters. This approach would of course leave out the middle man, the writer, letting the participles dangle where they may.
Dick Cheney’s book will be out in 2011. I do not know what to make of that delay, unless he really is serious about that statute of limitations he has referred to. He says it’s the statute on keeping secrets, but I want to check if it is perhaps a statute having something to do with the World Court and The Hague. In any case, as the leaks would have it, his main point is to tell us that W "went soft" during Bush 2. That is, he wasn’t so fast to take Cheney’s advice; that he became "malleable" to public opinion. A real man, I guess, should not be responsive to the citizens that elected him. Another way to look at this, say, from Bush’s perspective, is that he caught on that Cheney’s advice was edging him toward being considered the worst president in history, and therefore began to ignore the directives, I mean, advice. I guess my idea is that instead of Cheney explaining all this to a writer, he should just go on television and tell us.
One oddity is that a book, involving a middle man, will net Cheney seven figures or, God forbid, eight. A television show, one on one – a more direct report, to be sure – would net him … zero. Another thing about a book: You can’t question the author, or perhaps point out a fiction, should there happen to be one. There’s an upside, however, to Cheney’s forthcoming book. Since he will be registering his "disappointment" with Bush, you can pretty well be sure there will be a response from W’s partisans, so we can at least look forward to a catfight at the Crawford Corral.
Then there’s Karl Rove’s book to look forward to. I suspect this will be about his sad childhood cum apologia for his actions while manipulating, I mean serving the president.
The big whoop book I suspect will be Sarah Palin’s. I hope the writer preserves some of Ms. Palin’s syntax and that there are lots of pictures. I found it interesting that her book was sold to the imprint of HarperCollins that publishes Christian literature … which is not to say that Jews and Muslims will not give it a whirl. If they’ve not selected a title yet, I would suggest The Lame Duck Lives to See Another Day.
So get out your reading glasses, kids. Before you know it we will be hearing from two people who gave us the last eight years, and a third who was awfully good looking. (And could shoot wolves from planes, to boot.) Will these books be provocative? You betcha.
Read more about: Bob Barnett, Books, Dick Cheney, Entertainment, George Bush, HarperCollins, Margo Howard, News, Politics, Sarah Palin

























400 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Hey Walter…first off…(whispering here…) they don’t like it when you point out that their article lacks substance…
Remember…we may be dealing with a bit of professional envy here…It can be hard to take when so many writers are on the big best sellers lists. Glenn Beck, Mark Levin, Dick Morris, Michele Malkin….big sellers. Successful even.
Let’s just wait and see how many books that Palin sells. That will speak for itself.
As for your picture Walter…you do not resemble "an old goat". Were you aware that a woman’s hands will show her age…yes…interesting fact. That is why so many women hide their hands in a photograph… you betcha!
FSM~
First of all can you be sure Walter is a he? Perhaps he is a he/she - one never knows today … I found an interesting comment regarding Palin that I will post for your consideration - I think it says it all:
So How’s That Resignation Thing Going?
To continue the thought provoked by Sarah Palin: Crazy Like A Fox, I’m observing that the local heat based on petty nonsense on Palin has died down and the national heat based on important issues has lit up, and in a good way.
She has said that she will be much better situated to effect change outside of the governor’s office. Within three weeks, she’s nearly single handedly taken down Obamacare and broke a story about money going to Brazil to drill for oil.
She’s still taking a hit in the polls as most people react inside the box regarding her resignation. But that will change when her book comes out and she hits the circuit. It did for Hillary Clinton. It will for Sarah. It was at this point in Reagan’s situation following the 1976 loss to Gerald Ford that a poll was conducted that showed that more people would vote for Ford than Reagan if Ford decided to run in 1980. Reagan, however, still remained a top contender for the primaries as does Sarah Palin.
Have you seen vicious comments and biased articles in the Anchorage Daily News as of late? Have the Alaska bloggers been chronicling and stalking every move of Sarah Palin as of late and spinning it in such a way that MSNBC can’t but help to buy into it? Have we read any stories lately about new ethics complaints being filed or complaints from state legislators because Sarah Palin may want to go speak at a dinner out of state?
No. She’s not the governor anymore.
Half the PR battle was won with her resignation. By taking herself out of the spotlight of the governor’s office and acting in the privacy that it afforded regular citizens without title, she literally pulled the plug on most of what the smear campaign was trying to do to her.
It’s a brilliant move considering that she presents well researched pieces on her Facebook page which ultimately requires detractors to shift from personally attacking her to having to take her on about the issues. In this arena, the arena of ideas, Palin wins hands down.
Her well documented dissection of Obamacare took down the “death panel” provisions. She has created a fire storm that has focused positive attention on the issue even if her detractors are still spewing hatred toward her.
Instead of poking fun at her for being “Caribou Barbie,” they are now genuinely angered and anguished over the fact that their malcontent messiah is hitting a rough patch because of her. Suddenly liberals are involved in an actual policy debate nstead of the silly clothing barbs because of her.
She is a major threat to liberalism. Their unhingedness is allowing her presence to cause them to expose their philosophy for the morally and intellectually bankrupt ideology that it really is.
In conclusion, she is a one woman “death panel” for liberalism.