Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Sonia Sotomayor | 06/02/2009 9:50 am

Sonia Sotomayor Will Need to Impress at Her Capitol Hill Debut Today

Supreme Court nominee will likely have to answer questions on abortion, ‘racist’ claims in her whirlwind tour of the Senate ahead of confirmation hearings.
By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© Getty Images

Would you be nervous if you were up for the job at the highest court of the land and you needed to not only impress — but win over people who would soon put you through the wringer on everything from college acquaintances to who does your hair?

OK, we may be exaggerating a bit on the hair part, but the point is, Sonia Sotomayor has to be prepared to answer all sorts of questions — everything from questions about her judicial career, the New Haven, CT, case involving white firefighters and alleged race-based hiring practices, to inquiries about personal experiences, gay marriage, abortion and other topics — when she meets with senators and, later, goes before the Senate Judiciary Committee for confirmation this summer. She’s likely to get hammered on those accusations that she’s racist toward white men. Today, she begins her meet-and-greet on Capitol Hill when she sits down with Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

"I think she is going to make a great impression on everyone she sees," said Sen. Chuck Schumer, the New York Democrat who, along with fellow New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, is Sotomayor’s biggest cheerleader in the Senate. "She looks good on paper, but when you meet her, you’re even more impressed."

But the confirmation process won’t go down without some fight. More than 145 conservatives — including Gary Bauer and Manuel Miranda, chairman of the conservative Third Branch Conference — are demanding that Senate Republicans take a harder line on Sotomayor, which could include a filibuster to stall her nomination. Miranda even told Politico that McConnell should "consider resigning" as Senate minority leader if he can’t do the job, calling him "limp-wristed" and "a little bit tone deaf."

Senate Republicans say they’re in no hurry to confirm her, and want to be good and sure they go through every potential area of concern in her record. But the hope is she’s ready to take her seat on the bench October 1. Between now and then, she’ll need nerves of steel and a sharp mind and wit to get through the process. Being that she’s a born-and-bred New Yorker from the Bronx, we have little doubt she’ll come through with flying colors on that end!

75 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Kristy B
I’m sure that she will do just fine. Those people, who are going to give her a hard time, will be doing so in vain.
By Kristy B on 06/02/2009 10:00 am
Maggie W
She’s been vetted twice before, and by  Republicans.  It was H. W. Bush who placed her on the federal bench.  No doubt she is well prepared and will do just fine.
By Maggie W on 06/02/2009 10:04 am
f p
Yup
By f p on 06/02/2009 10:15 am
Maggie W
Watching Letterman’s " Top Ten Things About Sonia Sotomayor" last night.  Right up there was, " She has asked not to be seated next to Clarence Thomas."   
By Maggie W on 06/02/2009 11:25 am
f p
Whoa!  can’t blame her with hhis record. And who’d want to sit next to the vile little wimp Scalia?
By f p on 06/02/2009 12:12 pm
f p
The slimebag Newt just took back his racist comment on her.  Newt your time is long over.  Go away and hide under that rock with Cheney.
By f p on 06/03/2009 8:25 am
Suzanne Frazier
"Take it back" - like we did in grade school is in effect in Congress?   Interesting?  At least we have some maturity in the other two branches of government.
By Suzanne Frazier on 06/04/2009 8:30 am
Patty E
What is interesting to me is that it appears she will have to defend herself against some of the seeming,  ’manufactured’,  ""accusations""" that were made up by those who spend their time ‘purposely’ creating chaos.  She is the first person ….other than Sandra Day O’Conner, that I personally, can identify with—-not because she is a woman, either….but because she has real world experience that doesn’t revolve around board rooms and the politics of power.  IMO, she is the perfect pick for the average American, who are now paying attention to what Government and the Courts are doing. 
By Patty E on 06/02/2009 10:25 am
Suzanne Frazier

So what is so wrong with a Latino woman being able to render a better decision than a white man?  What is so wrong with a woman knowing more and having more intelligence, more wisdom, more compassion, more legal experience than a white man?

The Newt/Rush comments were a replay of the 1950’s.  I thought we had gotten through all those prejudices in the 1960’s.

Women are not staying home and cooking dinner these days.  We’re out there and we’re equal. 

By Suzanne Frazier on 06/04/2009 8:38 am
Patty E
Exactly, Suzanne!  But there is one secret the men haven’t discovered—-yet!  Or maybe they are ignoring it….according to several data collectors, it is the WOMEN who are supporting the families these days, with their jobs, income, and everything else…the men are unemployed and  STILL think they are ‘in charge’…..hahahaa
By Patty E on 06/04/2009 12:33 pm
Laura Ward
If she can’t handle this kind of grilling, she shouldn’t be a supreme court justice. But I’m sure she’ll do just fine.
By Laura Ward on 06/02/2009 10:30 am
caj p
She will do just fine, she has been in front of these kind of folks before and is more than able to make her case but I don’t think she will put up with any nonsense from anyone.  They are entitled to all ask questions but I feel the good majority already know that she is more than qualified for this role.  The Reps know she is fully qualified it’s only the talking heads on the outside who have no sense anyway that want to keep this racist jargon afloat with all their clap trap.
By caj p on 06/02/2009 12:04 pm
DeBúrca obj
How can she NOT do fine? Between her vast accomplishments and the absolutely lunatic, over the top bashing she has gotten from the right wing that she can now dismiss, she’ll do great.
By DeBúrca obj on 06/02/2009 12:15 pm
Mary Quite-Contrary

How can she NOT do fine? 

Wellll…let’s start with her thoughts on how well ‘white males’ can do relative to how well ‘a Latina’ can?  And how that mindset was reflected in her previous decisions (like the Ricci v. City of Hartford case) where she (surprise!) ruled against 9 white males (and one black male) —who were trying for promotions within the Hartford, CT Fire Department —because the test they scored the highest on ‘wasn’t fair’ to other minorities.  Yes…Judge Sotomayor believes that when a burning building (lets say a chemical warehouse) is in danger of collapse/explosion; pesky notions like tested documented knowledge of truss support; chemistry; burn patterns; aren’t really ‘fair’ knowledge…if you are a white male who scored well on the test.  To the mind set of her dismissal of the Ricci case, its not the best qualified applicant who should be promoted…it should be the most ethno/racial centric candidate (the one who can check off the most affirmative action boxes).

The Ricci case, is to be heard this Fall before the SCOTUS…fascinating how these things all string together.

By Mary Quite-Contrary on 06/02/2009 12:35 pm
DeBúrca obj
Don’t get your hopes up Quite-C… the hearings and confirmation are not going to go the right wing hack route, comments and ruling history will be put into context and she will speak for herself.
By DeBúrca obj on 06/02/2009 12:59 pm