Wall Street Weekly | 09/26/2009 12:00 am
Summing the Summits: More Splendid Speeches, by Liz Peek

Image: WhiteHouse.gov
Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 9/21)
Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.
Is Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi looking more and more like Clarabell or is it just my imagination? And seriously, after 40 years at Libya’s helm, shouldn’t he have risen above the rank of Colonel?The fact that these thoughts are uppermost after reviewing the goings-on at the United Nations this week says it all. Though President Obama appears to have wrested from President Medvedev a vague commitment to consider toughening sanctions on Iran (presumably in exchange for torching our proposed missile defense system) and extracted from China possible support for a nuclear weapons ban, not much of substance emerged from the weeklong gridlock imposed on midtown Manhattan. Now the party moves to Pittsburgh, where the G-20 has first turned its attentions to not-so-shocking claims that Iran has been illegally enriching uranium. Beyond setting a deadline for Iran to come clean about its activities, the G-20 leaders will push to rebalance the engines of growth, insisting that the U.S. consumer cannot support the advances of the rest of the globe.
This is diplomatic code for the U.S. reining in our spendthrift consumers and China doing all it can to stimulate domestic spending. That the Chinese have even participated in such conversations is considered astonishing by some, given the nation’s history of going it alone. Before rushing to embrace Beijing’s newfound clubbiness, we should consider that nearly everything China does is in its self-interest. Starting with the extraordinary success of last year’s Olympics, and bolstered by its impressive economic performance during the financial crisis, China’s confidence is in full bloom. They are ready to climb the global podium.
One symptom of China’s emerging self-importance is that tweaking the West has become a national pastime. As the country approaches its 60th anniversary on October 1, the Communist Party has continued its tradition of honoring "model workers." While in the past these individuals have typically been oilfield workers or latrine cleaners, the Financial Times reports that this year the country is praising bankers – of all people – sending them out to tour the country and extolling their efforts to "maintain growth, protect people’s livelihoods (and) maintain stability." What more mischievous way to contrast China’s continued growth with the West’s banking meltdown?
More importantly, next week the country will put on a military review that will draw global attention to the massive 20-year investment China has made in its weapons stash and in its armed forces. Among other new toys on display will be an upgraded intercontinental nuclear missile capable of reaching Washington. After decades of hosting a military long on bodies and short on guns, the Chinese now boast a 21st-century army of 2.3 million.
Competition with China that originally emanated from corporate boardrooms is, in other words, spreading. Because China holds over $800 billion in U.S. government debt, a figure that continues to grow, the country expects and indeed has a seat at our financial table. What does it mean for Americans?
Our indebtedness to China means that we are not in a position to bully Beijing to revalue the yuan, though early on the Obama administration talked tough on this issue, which in turn limits our ability to export to China and to other countries. It also means that Americans will not be alone in pressing the administration to rein in government deficits. The Chinese will have to balance its continuing need for export demand with its concern over depreciating dollar-based assets. The bottom line is that our complicated symbiotic relationship with the Chinese is yet another factor arguing for slower growth in the U.S. going forward.
Read more about: Barack Obama, G-20 Summit, Government, Liz Peek, Muammar Gaddafi, News, Pittsburgh, Politics, Wall Street Weekly























276 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Dear Leigh- this is an excellent summary of "the other view." It worries me that people have embraced the alarums about climate change with utter faith, and that most people dismiss skepticism of the cimate change industry’s claims as the rantings of lunatics. The truth is a many of the projections about future damage to the planet are highly dubious computer-generated simulations- not unlike the projections spun out by those who claimed that they were "avoiding risk" in the financial markets. My view is that there is, indeed, an entire industry now built on the premise that the earth is cooling, and that there are enormous vested interests that need to keep people as scared as possible. At the end of the day, I see no harm in trying to clean up our water and air; certainly in many parts of the world (even in the US) industrial pollution is unhealthy and should be conquered. However, the broad-based cap and trade approach is like taking a bulldozer to work out the wrinkle in a sheet- too broad-based, too expensive and at the end, unmanageable. Thank you so much for sharing this! Best - Liz
Ms Peek: Many of us who take climate change seriously do not do so with "utter faith," nor do some of us view skeptics as ranting lunatics–-although there are some––. Take the case of Alan Carlin, who certainly is not in the latter category, with whom I’m sure you are familiar with. The suppression of his views were wrong, but they have been acknowledged and apologised for. The latest on this case is:
"But the newly obtained documents show that Dr. Carlin’s highly skeptical views on global warming, which have been known for more than a decade within the small unit where he works, have been repeatedly challenged by scientists inside and outside the E.P.A.; that he holds a doctorate in economics, not in atmospheric science or climatology; that he has never been assigned to work on climate change; and that his comments on the endangerment finding were a product of rushed and at times shoddy scholarship, as he acknowledged Thursday in an interview. " (from NYT)
I agree that the cap and trade bill from the House is a wrinkle, but unlike your assessment, I don’t think it goes far enough to address our problem of carbon emissions. Money, of course, like most everything else it seems, is at the heart of many of these debates. Who will prosper, who will lose. You and I will probably be long dead before we see the real effects of global warming/climate change if we don’t try and do something about it now. I’d rather be on the preventative side rather than the side that denies there is a problem. We, as far as we know, are on the only habitable planet. We need to protect it the very best we can.
Undoubtedly the majority of thinking Americans believe the global warming issue is in doubt. There is still much evidence to come in, and many reputable scientists do not believe in the findings propagated by Al Gore. (You remember him…the inventor of the internet).
And, yes, national security is MUCH more important.
deber says global warming has nothing to do with human activitites––it’s all a myth. Please jot that down in the book of scientific discoveries and be sure and tell Al he’s full of hot air. But just in case deber is wrong, and a lot of that hot air begins to cause catastophropic warming in places otherwise cold and cozy, then be sure and tell deber the same thing you once might have told Al. It’s always good to hold your bets close to your chest, or so they say.
Deber B,
I’m with you on global warming. Right now there is not enough evidence to prove it as being true. I think it is all political and a way to pass cap and tax. Gore is a joke, always has been and always will be. Talk about a fear tactic
Deber, No one knows for sure about Arafat’s death! He died in France and his personal physician claimed "Poisoning"! The public will never know the truth, because neither sides can be trusted!
The same with Sharon who died in 2006, while the World Tribune announced his death, Googlenews and Yahoonews still had him in surgery!