Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Wall Street Weekly | 09/26/2009 12:00 am

Summing the Summits: More Splendid Speeches, by Liz Peek

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 9/21) 

Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.

Is Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi looking more and more like Clarabell or is it just my imagination? And seriously, after 40 years at Libya’s helm, shouldn’t he have risen above the rank of Colonel?

The fact that these thoughts are uppermost after reviewing the goings-on at the United Nations this week says it all. Though President Obama appears to have wrested from President Medvedev a vague commitment to consider toughening sanctions on Iran (presumably in exchange for torching our proposed missile defense system) and extracted from China possible support for a nuclear weapons ban, not much of substance emerged from the weeklong gridlock imposed on midtown Manhattan. Now the party moves to Pittsburgh, where the G-20 has first turned its attentions to not-so-shocking claims that Iran has been illegally enriching uranium. Beyond setting a deadline for Iran to come clean about its activities, the G-20 leaders will push to rebalance the engines of growth, insisting that the U.S. consumer cannot support the advances of the rest of the globe.

This is diplomatic code for the U.S. reining in our spendthrift consumers and China doing all it can to stimulate domestic spending. That the Chinese have even participated in such conversations is considered astonishing by some, given the nation’s history of going it alone. Before rushing to embrace Beijing’s newfound clubbiness, we should consider that nearly everything China does is in its self-interest. Starting with the extraordinary success of last year’s Olympics, and bolstered by its impressive economic performance during the financial crisis, China’s confidence is in full bloom. They are ready to climb the global podium.

One symptom of China’s emerging self-importance is that tweaking the West has become a national pastime. As the country approaches its 60th anniversary on October 1, the Communist Party has continued its tradition of honoring "model workers." While in the past these individuals have typically been oilfield workers or latrine cleaners, the Financial Times reports that this year the country is praising bankers – of all people – sending them out to tour the country and extolling their efforts to "maintain growth, protect people’s livelihoods (and) maintain stability." What more mischievous way to contrast China’s continued growth with the West’s banking meltdown?

More importantly, next week the country will put on a military review that will draw global attention to the massive 20-year investment China has made in its weapons stash and in its armed forces. Among other new toys on display will be an upgraded intercontinental nuclear missile capable of reaching Washington. After decades of hosting a military long on bodies and short on guns, the Chinese now boast a 21st-century army of 2.3 million.

Competition with China that originally emanated from corporate boardrooms is, in other words, spreading. Because China holds over $800 billion in U.S. government debt, a figure that continues to grow, the country expects and indeed has a seat at our financial table. What does it mean for Americans?

Our indebtedness to China means that we are not in a position to bully Beijing to revalue the yuan, though early on the Obama administration talked tough on this issue, which in turn limits our ability to export to China and to other countries. It also means that Americans will not be alone in pressing the administration to rein in government deficits. The Chinese will have to balance its continuing need for export demand with its concern over depreciating dollar-based assets. The bottom line is that our complicated symbiotic relationship with the Chinese is yet another factor arguing for slower growth in the U.S. going forward.

276 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Mary Quite-Contrary

Maggie I am not the one reaching here.  You are.  You cannot spin, explain, or use my clever pose back at me to explain away the lack of the heralded ‘transparency’ Mr. Obama PROMISED.  It is inexcusable, you know it, I know…anyone reading this knows it…for a decision that affects every man, woman and child; that amounts to 1/6th of our economy; not be a ‘mystery’ to be amended at the whim of our elected ‘betters’  (who allegedly ‘know’ what is in this Bill).

Believe me, Maggie I call my Rep and my Senators.  Regularly.  And you should too!!!  Hurry, Maggie, hurry…please call yours tell them to ‘just go ahead and vote’ any ole way they want—they know best!!!’ that your concerns (or those of other citizens) should just be ignored.  Card blanche…vote without any input from the constituency.  Yes…you have, with great clarity, described ObamaTransparency. 

My eyes, by the way, are dry.  And wide open.  Try openning yours.

By Mary Quite-Contrary on 09/27/2009 5:33 pm
Zera Lee

Just what is it you think Obama promised, Mary?

Sunlight Before Signing: Too often bills are rushed through Congress and to the president before the public has the opportunity to review them. President Obama will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days.

This is actually pretty bold, considering that the President only has 10 days to sign a Bill or return it to Congress.

Granted, his web people suck on the execution end, but the mechanism is there somewhere - I’ve run into it a few times myself.

He did not make any promises about posting bills still in Congress, that is already done by the GPO. It helps a lot to have the specific bill number. The Congressional Record can also tell you what is being said on the floor of each chamber. I have not done much searching for committee minutes, so I’m not sure where the best source is for what happens in committee. Maybe you can ask during your next call.

By Zera Lee on 09/30/2009 3:38 am
Rainbow Power
I forgot to mention that the arrest and the foiled attempt to blow up the Springfield Illinois federal building wasn’t the working of Bush’s policies in Springfield.  It was an effort of the IBI, FBI, Springfield police and ISP.   I actually know some after-the-fact inside info on this living right in the heartland of Springfield Illinois.  Bush might have done a good job when 9-11 occurred, but he has left the building and left his papers, and, as computers need updating, so do procedures in curtailing terrorist actions. 
By Rainbow Power on 09/26/2009 7:20 am
DeBúrca obj
I don’t agree at all that Bush did a good job after 9/11 but I’m with you on the fact that the foiled attempt in Springfield had nothing to do with Bush policies and I’ll go one further, there is absolutely no indication that the recent arrests have anything to do with Bush policy either.
By DeBúrca obj on 09/26/2009 8:28 am
Fly O. T. Wall

There is every indication, DeBurca.

These actions (to thwart terroist acts) are the direct consequence of Bush policies that became law when the Patriot Act was enacted by Congress.

By Fly O. T. Wall on 09/26/2009 11:50 am
DeBúrca obj
No, the arrests of the terrorists by the Obama administration was the result of LAW ENFORCEMENT. And furthermore, had Bush managed this, he would have been holding press conferences exploiting it and trying to stir up more fear in order to get more power. The Obama administration has handled this impeccably. 
By DeBúrca obj on 09/28/2009 10:47 am
deber B
And WHO do you think alerted the local law enforcement people to watch a certain someone?   DeBurca, you don’t know what Bush would’ve been doing by now.   The Patriot Act helped this administration to catch the sleeper cell terrorists.     You are obcessed with George Bush.   Pssst…."he’s not the president anymore."
By deber B on 09/28/2009 12:08 pm
macwoof woof
The problem with expecting Obama to turn back time so everyone can have a Hummer in their front yard and a 50 inch big screen in each and every room, and having cell phones for everyone in the family (so the kids can twitter and text their bff) , is that, as a planet, we are running our of sustainable resources and people are dying daily to provide us with our toys and oil to run our toys. It is all about OIL, greed, selfishness .  Now if only global warming could be blamed on obama, we would suddenly have more worried people.
By macwoof woof on 09/26/2009 11:32 am
Leigh Hart

Woofy, Who said anything about Obama turning back time? I’ve only met one person who owned a Hummer, but I know plenty of good men who have driven them in war. We no longer have land lines and our kids have had cell phones in order for US to be able to reach them. If they want to twitter and text their bff’s it’s cool as long as they don’t go over their minutes. As far as natural resources, well we have plenty of our own oil to get through the period needed to come up with real energy alternatives. Our government refuses to tap into those preferring to keep us dependent upon foreign oil because it suits their agenda.

I’m happy you’ve at least come around to understanding how much Obama worries people. I’m proud of the progress you’ve made woofy! Keep up the good work.

By Leigh Hart on 09/26/2009 1:10 pm
Mary Quite-Contrary
Global warming is NO ones fault…as it is an imaginary occurence. Co2 emmissions and (scary) green house gases are great buzz words, but junk science (at best) and fraud (at worst). The earth naturally warms and cools in tune with sun spot activity (warming) and absence (cooling). As the sun is in an 11 year cycle of low sun spot activity (no solar spots currently visable) the earth is cooling. But hey, don’t let that stand in the way of a good propaganda campaign.
By Mary Quite-Contrary on 09/27/2009 1:48 pm
Leigh Hart
P. S. You do know Hummer went out of business, right?
By Leigh Hart on 09/26/2009 1:12 pm
phyllis Doyle Pepe
And the reason it did go out of business is because….?
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 09/26/2009 5:24 pm
Callie O
Actually, Hummer did not go out of business.  It was purchased by a Chinese manufacturer.  So it will still be tracking around, only in China.  Apparently most nations are not worried about the Al Gore fiasco.
By Callie O on 09/27/2009 11:23 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Thanks for that info––didn’t know that––I mean about the Hummer. Actually most developed nations are worried about what you call the "Al Gore Fiasco" and are pressing our country to do more re: our emissions policy.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 09/27/2009 5:21 pm
Zera Lee

Did that finally go through? Last I heard, the Chinese government had blocked the deal. Environmental concerns was believed to be the main reason, confusion over patents was also mentioned.

CEOWORLD article
BBC: China ‘to block’ Hummer takeover

And no, the world really did not like Bush backing out of the Kyoto Accord. If you check the list, you will see that “most countries” are indeed concerned about global warming. In fact, we are the only country opposed to doing anything.

By Zera Lee on 09/30/2009 4:30 am