Hillary Clinton is a hot topic at the Supreme Court this week.

The highest court in the land will soon consider whether a movie critical of the former First Lady should be considered a campaign ad as outlined by the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law. "Hillary: The Movie," produced by conservative group Citizens United, essentially documents how Mrs. Clinton was perceived to be unfit to be commander in chief, and was supposed to air just before the presidential primary.

"If you want to hear about the Clinton scandals of the past and present, you have it here!" reads the movie’s website. "’Hillary: The Movie’ is the first and last word in what the Clintons want America to forget!"

Citizens United hoped to distribute the film through a cable provider’s on-demand system, but the Bush administration’s Federal Election Commission halted that plan because the film was considered "prohibited electioneering communication." Former Bush solicitor general Ted Olson blasted McCain-Feingold for smothering free expression with the "most complicated, expensive, incomprehensible regulatory regime ever created." He argued that the Hillary movie shouldn’t be considered "advocacy" and therefore didn’t have to abide by campaign finance ad-funding rules. "The Constitution … errs on the side of permitting the speech, not prohibiting the speech," Olson said.

But don’t expect the Supreme Court to buy that argument. Justices David Souter, Stephen Breyer, Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and others went back and forth on what can be considered a campaign ad. If the court sides with Citizens United, it could loosen restrictions on political advertising. So far, no decision. A decision could come as late as June. Stay tuned!

Watch the "Hillary: The Movie" trailer below: