Who Will Obama Pick to Replace Souter? | 05/01/2009 8:05 am
Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter Retirement Prompts Obama Nomination Rumors

Supreme Court of the United States
Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter plans to retire at the end of the court’s current term in June, National Public Radio reported late Thursday. Souter has already informed the White House of his decision.
Sixty-nine-year-old Souter was appointed by President George H.W. Bush in 1990. Liberals originally feared that the virtually unknown Republican would swing conservative, but his decisions proved otherwise, and Souter is known to fit in with the more liberal bloc. Souter in 1992 voted to uphold Roe v. Wade, the landmark decision that
affirmed abortion rights. After 19 years in the Supreme Court, Souter says he’s not a fan of politics and wants to settle in his home state of New Hampshire.
NPR reports that these females may likely end up on Obama’s short list:
- Elena Kagan, the current solicitor general who represents the government before the Supreme Court;
- Sonia Sotomayor, a Hispanic judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit;
- Diane Wood, a federal judge in Chicago who taught at the University of Chicago at the same time future President Barack Obama was teaching constitutional law there.
The New Republic also suggests Obama will likely pick a woman:
A Democratic, female John Roberts would be a highly respected Democratic Supreme Court advocate, and the clear front-runner in that category is Beth S. Brinkmann, 49, a partner at Morrison & Foerster who has argued more than 20 cases before the Court. A lawyer like Brinkmann — moderate, pragmatic and pro-business — would have no trouble being confirmed to an appellate courtship, but there might not be enough time to get her through: Bush was able to promote Roberts from private practice only because there were no Supreme Court vacancies in his first term. A Democratic president may not have this luxury.Tell us: Who Should Obama pick to fill Souter’s seat?























23 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
"I loved Sandra O’Connor."
Me too! I want her to run a Truth Commission on "enhanced interrogation techniques" and holding detainees for years without any due process and illegal wiretapping and the Patriot Act and the lies that led to the war in Iraq and while she’s at it she can look into Bush v Gore…..
Majority rules….a woman it shall be!!!! Now follow thru obama!!!
The problem Obama will face is not a bumper crop of well qualified, intelligent women candidates; as there are many. It is the political baggage that alot of his campaign rhetoric drags along. Sadly, to keep his ‘base’ happy, alot of litmus tests will be applied to any Supreme nomination he makes.
Souter was not a conservative or even a centrist on the bench; yet, because he was a ‘Bush’ appointment, I fear the far left will call for someone on the fringes to ‘make up’ for his perceived (though not validated by decision making) right leanings. This is just going to be fascinating to watch…multiple times, as Ginsberg is in failing health.
It is more important that we have a qualified person on the court than a person chosen on the basis of their sex.
To appoint a woman just because she is a woman is just as sexist as it would be to deny a woman a position because of her sex.
That’s a great point.
I’ve also noticed that when applying for work online, it is no longer "optional" to fill out my racial, sexual, and veteran status.
Doesn’t seem much like an even playing field when the government grants tax incentives to hire minorities regardless of qualifications.
Kinda sets my blonde hair ablazing: but that’s a different thread entirely.