Caroline Kennedy, Ambassador to the Vatican | 04/13/2009 9:20 am
Vatican Rebuffs Caroline Kennedy Ambassador Seat Over Abortion, Say Sources

Just when Caroline Kennedy was recovering from the political mess over her bid for Hillary Clinton’s Senate seat, she now has hit some more political roadblocks. And these are coming from a holier land: the Vatican.
The Massachusetts Catholic Action League and sources within the Vatican itself are protesting the idea President Obama may appoint JFK’s daugher as an ambassador to the Vatican. Why are they so angry? Because Ms. Kennedy, a Catholic, supports abortion rights.
Sen. John Kerry, D-MA, reportedly was pushing Obama to pick Kennedy, 53, for the job, but C.J. Doyle, executive director of the Massachusetts league, said her nomination is "a calculated insult to the Holy See."
"It’s inappropriate to appoint someone who pretends to be a Catholic but rejects the fundamental teachings of the Church," Doyle said. U.S. Ambassador to the Vatican Raymond L. Flynn told The Boston Herald Kennedy’s nomination would be a "mistake."
Vatican sources told the Italian newspaper Il Giornale that they disapprove of several of Obama’s ambassador picks, including Kennedy, because of their stances on abortion or stem cells. But the Vatican is denying reports that they’ve opposed any of Obama’s picks over their split on abortion.
"No proposals about the new ambassador of the United States to the Holy See have reached the Vatican, and therefore it is not true that they have been rejected. The rumors circulating about this topic are not reliable," the spokesman, Jesuit Father Federico Lombardi, told Catholic News Service. "It’s possible names have been circulated inside the U.S. administration, and perhaps rejected for some reason or other, but not because of any Vatican veto."
So far, no official word from the Obama camp on what’s what. But needless to say, the split on such a controversial topic will likely make for a slightly awkward meeting between Obama and Pope Benedict XVI in Italy in July.























23 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
I don’t think this is an "embarassment" for Caroline Kennedy. They could have chosen anyone with the same opinions and had the same thing happen.
This is yet another example of a Pope who prefers to stay in the era of the 14th Century. By the way, there has been women as ambassadors to the Vatican. Cokie Roberts mother, Lindy Boggs.
I agree with Mary.
Kennedy is not a Catholic in good standing. However, she is a high profile Catholic because she is a Kennedy (a family that has time and again made a mockery of the religion, in my opinion). Her father made history by becoming the first Catholic person elected to the presidency and then frankly and publicly ignored the basic tenants of the faith. Also, the Kennedy family basically got Obama elected: without their endorsement, we would probably be calling Hilary president. The whole situation smacks of payback to me.
Having Kennedy be the ambassador to the Vatican shows a lack of sensitivity. I’m wonder who thought of this in the first place and why she was even considered a viable candidate for such a position. But hey, we all have to pay the bills.
Well, Mary, what I was actually referring to was the payback from the Obama crew. Obama was elected in large part due to the endorsement of the Kennedy family about a year ago. Until that time, he was not considered all that strong a candidate: the party put their muscle behind Hilary Clinton.
When the Kennedy family endorsed Obama, his campaign shot forward until he eventually won the Democratic nomination and eventually the presidency. I’m sure there were a few deals done (you endorse me, I’ll give your Caroline a senate seat (that didn’t work), I’ll get her an ambassadorship (where would you like her to go? Oh, sure the Vatican! Don’t see why not) made to pay the Kennedies off for the endorsement/campaigning.
And yes indeed. Nice to see SOMEONE use Caroline’s legal name. She is married to a Jewish man. Why doesn’t she use her married name anymore? It mysteriously "went away" in the last year or so….