Question of the Day | 05/12/2009 11:00 pm
What might the loss of our tradition of bipartisanism mean for the country?
shutterstock_election_donkey_elephant_scales.jpg)
161 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Rocky, I sure agree with your thoughts on the idea of "debate!" Whate ever happened to real debate with facts and information? It does not mean a good exchange through a thoughtful process any more.
You are so right in the idea that it is now simply who is the winner or loser today!
What people are overlooking, in all this talk of bipartisanship, is that there is a great variety of viewpoints within the Democratic party. In fact, the way that the Congress was won, in part due to Raum Emanuel’s leadership, was to look in Republican districts for Democrats who were conservative enough to win in those districts. It is a big tent philosophy.
If the Republican party wants to go curl up and die in a purity purge of their party, purging everyone who is not antiabortion, neocon, fiscally irresponsible and disrespectful of the Constitution, I say it is a good thing.
There is a reason this nation elected a President who got his feet wet teaching Constitutional law. We saw the harm caused by a President who routinely disregarded the Constitution.
As for Arlen Specter, he has always represented Pennsyvlania, and so he has always been independent. Whether he is a RINO or a DINO, it doesn’t matter. He represents his state.
There are more than two parties anyway. We have actual independents in Congress, and there are Greens and Peace and Freedom and other parties across the country.
I believe we will continue to have two parties with one or the other stronger at any particular point in time. Remember, it was just eight years ago that Carl Rove was seeing a future where Repbulicans would always be in charge.
My hope is that we grow more independents. People who actively participate in the political process. Who look at the candidates individually, not just through a party lens. People who can think for themselves and choose wisely. Wouldn’t that be real democracy in action?
I am an Independant because no one tells me what to think or who to vote for. So wonder no more. I’ve never been a follower and don’t plan to start now.
If by bipartisan you mean the constant petty bickering that we see daily from both parties right here (another reason I am Independent), I’d say it’s alive and well. If you mean a healthy exchange of ideas about what is best for our country, we haven’t had that for a very long time, if ever.

24 Comments






























