Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Question of the Day | 05/12/2009 11:00 pm

What might the loss of our tradition of bipartisanism mean for the country?

The erosion of the Republican Party may only be temporary. However, if we lose our tradition of bipartisanism, what might this mean for the country? Candice Bergen, Liz Smith and Joan Ganz Cooney weigh in …
© Shutterstock
Liz Smith

Liz Smith | 05/12/2009 11:00 pm

Liz Smith: 'Leave the Old GOP to the Rush Limbaughs'

The Republicans will come back. They have to. They just need to regain their senses, get back to the middle of the road and stop listening to the voices of far-right insanity. They need to develop their own real governmental plans for success in the future instead of just pitifully attacking Democratic plans. They need, we all need, to be united and cooperative instead of just obstructive. The two-party system will prevail, no matter what the two parties call themselves. Maybe sensible Republicans should rename themselves Independent Republicans and leave the old GOP to the Rush Limbaughs.
Joan Ganz Cooney

Joan Ganz Cooney | 05/12/2009 11:00 pm

Joan Ganz Cooney: The Republicans Have Nine Lives

Not so fast. I don’t think the Republican Party is about to disappear. Everyone seems to forget that after Barry Goldwater lost nearly every state in the union in 1964, the Republican Party came roaring back with none other than Richard Nixon. Then after Watergate and all the obituaries for the Republican Party and the one term of Carter, Reagan came in for eight years, followed by four more with George H.W. Bush. I don’t ever count those guys out. This country has never been particularly bipartisan but I believe we’ll always have at least two parties.
Candice Bergen

Candice Bergen | 05/12/2009 11:00 pm

Candice Bergen Thinks Republicans Have Become 'Utterly Irrelevant'

The Republicans seem to have hit a long, bad, mean-spirited patch. Well, another of those patches. The last eight years seem to have honed their combativeness to a fine and brittle point. They have become hopelessly extremist in their conservatism, utterly irrelevant and hopelessly inflexible.
Maybe what Liz said is the direction they should take; become the Independent Republican party. Reinvent themselves. Give themselves a good name for God’s sake. Find some vibrant young intelligent leaders and work with the Democrats instead of being so mindlessly obstructionist.

161 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

MK P
I agree totally, Chris………..scathing rhetoric changes the mind of no one……and women in particular are turned off by it.
By MK P on 05/13/2009 11:39 am
rocky rocky
Why is that, I wonder, Chris. "Bipartisanship" has turned in to a contest, a war. Who is the "winner"; who is the "loser." Who is immoral; who is holy. Like there are answers to those questions in the real world! We can’t have discussions anymore. We can’t work on an idea until it becomes a solution. Nothing can be done in the best way possible if we keep this up. I’m even getting to hate the word "debate," if now it merely means just put up your dukes and give as good (or bad) as you get. sheesh. Very discouraged today.
By rocky rocky on 05/13/2009 11:59 am
Chris Broersma

Rocky,  I sure agree with your thoughts on the idea of "debate!"  Whate ever happened to real debate with facts and information?  It does not mean a good exchange through a thoughtful process any more. 

You are so right in the idea that it is now simply who is the winner or loser today!

By Chris Broersma on 05/13/2009 1:35 pm
MK P
Chris…..you are so correct.   I see so much information provided by the right as "fact" but when you ask for a source………you either get none, or you get a right wing opinion blog.   Credible sources do not seem to be their forte.
By MK P on 05/13/2009 1:43 pm
Nanny hasSeven
We’ve been down this road before, with BOTH parties. Hopefully, when the Republicans come back, they’ll be a kinder, more moderate party that will be more appealing and in step with how most Americans think and feel today. It’s wrong to count them completley out. They’re just down, perhaps for a decade, but they’ll be back.
By Nanny hasSeven on 05/13/2009 11:53 am
Elizabeth Bennett

What people are overlooking, in all this talk of bipartisanship, is that there is a great variety of viewpoints within the Democratic party.  In fact, the way that the Congress was won, in part due to Raum Emanuel’s leadership, was to look in Republican districts for Democrats who were conservative enough to win in those districts.  It is a big tent philosophy. 

If the Republican party wants to go curl up and die in a purity purge of their party, purging everyone who is not antiabortion, neocon, fiscally irresponsible and disrespectful of the Constitution, I say it is a good thing.  

 There is a reason this nation elected a President who got his feet wet teaching Constitutional law.  We saw the harm caused by a President who routinely disregarded the Constitution.  

As for Arlen Specter, he has always represented Pennsyvlania, and so he has always been independent.  Whether he is a RINO or a DINO, it doesn’t matter.  He represents his state.  

There are more than two parties anyway.  We have actual independents in Congress, and there are Greens and Peace and Freedom and other parties across the country.  

By Elizabeth Bennett on 05/13/2009 12:10 pm
Barbara

I believe we will continue to have two parties with one or the other stronger at any particular point in time.  Remember, it was just eight years ago that Carl Rove was seeing a future where Repbulicans would always be in charge.

My hope is that we grow more independents.  People who actively participate in the political process.  Who look at the candidates individually, not just through a party lens.  People who can think for themselves and choose wisely.  Wouldn’t that be real democracy in action?

By Barbara on 05/13/2009 12:33 pm
Rita@ Goldivas
I have to wonder about "independents". While there is a lot of individualism with both parties, what about the party platform? It seems to me independents can be fence-sitters. And, being a registered Repbulican or Democrat doesn’t mean you vote mindlessly.
By Rita@ Goldivas on 05/13/2009 1:56 pm
Kryssi K
Excuse me, I am not a "fence-sitter" just because NEITHER party is capable of doing things correctly without getting too far into extremes. Certain issues call for conservatism while other issues call for progressiveness, therefore we Indies vote according to which overrated politician has their priorities closest to ours. Simple as that.
By Kryssi K on 05/13/2009 6:21 pm
Barbara
Rita - I don’t agree with either party’s "platform" totally.  So I’m an independent.  Not a fence-sitter at all.  I vote for the individual and for the approach to issues I believe in.  That is thoughtfullness, not fence-sitting.
By Barbara on 05/13/2009 3:00 pm
Barbara B
Laura Ward you said exactly what I feel.  My family will always vote and probably always disagree but having two parties is what will keep this THE LAND OF THE FREE.  We know everybody is trying to get in and very few want to leave.  We must be doing something right.
By Barbara B on 05/13/2009 3:52 pm
Deena B.

I am an Independant because no one tells me what to think or who to vote for.  So wonder no more.  I’ve never been a follower and don’t plan to start now.  

If by bipartisan you mean the constant petty bickering that we see daily from both parties right here (another reason I am Independent), I’d say it’s alive and well.  If you mean a healthy exchange of ideas about what is best for our country, we haven’t had that for a very long time, if ever.

By Deena B. on 05/13/2009 3:54 pm
Barbara B
B Clark you are correct one party would be the end of America as we know it.  Checks & Balances is what makes this country great.  As to Belinda’s comments which were excellent I think the last eight years is more than just Bush but maybe Dems as well as Reps went the way the wind instead of what is right vs wrong.  Here is my take on this.  Who wants to be Senator or who wants to be in Congress.  We’ll in this economy I would.  $300,000 for life along with Medical Hey I’m in and if I have to vote to keep someone happy hey I’ll do it.  My point being is that along with some good intentions lies Greed, Self entitlement, Etc, Etc.  Now I know someone will post that my facts are wrong about their pension and healthcare but I think I remember readiing something to that effect.  I know I’m a movie buff and I love the old movies, but my favorite movie was American President with Michael Douglas.  After watching that movie I turned to my husband after MD Speech and said why can’t all our Presidents be like him.  So as long as Americans have dreams we need checks & balances
By Barbara B on 05/13/2009 4:09 pm
jules verne
We all have had a part in "ruining" this country and its politics.  Our tolerance of substandard behavior is going to be the ruination of the country.  We cannot afford to lose bipartisanship.  It’s bad enough that the Democrats are in now and they are promoting socialism, but if there is no middle of the road we will die.
By jules verne on 05/13/2009 5:39 pm
Kryssi K
Ummm make room for the 32096832 OTHER parties that get snubbed?
By Kryssi K on 05/13/2009 6:19 pm