Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Poll | 11/10/2008 12:00 am

Did Spitzer get what he deserved?

27 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Delete This
Spitzer is an arrogant a-hole….but it was also a political hit because he was going after bankers and calling them out for what they were doing….and predicting the mess we are now in. His reputation is shot. Yes, he got what he deserved. Why prosecute him? When do they ever prosecute the johns? Only the women, including the WDC Madam who hung herself. Was that justice to try her and the likes of David Vitter are still in the Senate. Of course not. It’s disgusting but it is how it is.
By Delete This on 11/10/2008 1:24 am
Frannie Em
No, he didn’t get what he deserved. He is an incredible arrogant hypocrite who obviously believes he is above the law. What a ridiculous ass and a waste of talent.
By Frannie Em on 11/10/2008 1:39 am
Brooklyn Gal
Totally agree, with the exception of the “talent”. He was not willing to work with the State Assembly or Senate and no one was that sad to see him go, including myself. Totally arrogant to the point where he was caught using the same methods he caught others.
By Brooklyn Gal on 11/10/2008 7:58 am
Ms. Dee
But I’ll bet there are many, even among his accusers who are guilty of just as much malfiesance. I hope Obama’s really as squeaky clean as the campaign leads me to believe. He’s got some real bad actors to confront if he’s gonna get anything done.
By Ms. Dee on 11/10/2008 5:33 am
Marjorie C.
Spitzer certainly doesn’t make good husband material, but he probably paid enough for what he did. He lost his job, career, respect, integrity and possibly his family, although loss of family might be the least bothersome to him. All that brainpower and potential compromised… it’s a shame really.
By Marjorie C. on 11/10/2008 6:15 am
Tick Pyne
Wow, Marjorie. I finally agree with you on something.
By Tick Pyne on 11/10/2008 8:06 am
Leigh Gregg
Do any of us ever get what we deserve?
By Leigh Gregg on 11/10/2008 6:50 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Obama just did.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 11/10/2008 5:03 pm
Diana T
Spitzer got what he deserved in that he is political toast. Now, he is like the rest of us—-if he wants to be successful again, he will have to work at it and build himself from the ground up, proving himself along the way. Very humbling.
By Diana T on 11/10/2008 7:50 am
Chrome Toe
I think so. I think for men like him the public humiliation is far worse than the private prosecution. He lost his job, his family is in crisis, he is considered a “joke”… his arrogance and hypocrisy cost him exactly what arrogance and hyocrisy can cost people.
By Chrome Toe on 11/10/2008 8:49 am
C jay
What Spitzer deserves isn’t possible in our country; however, he merely joins the cadre of “those who were caught,” so common in life. Let’s face it, such is far more acceptable to the males of our species, and they’ll do almost anything possible to accept it. That being the case, apparently he was exonerated from all misappropriation of public funds; I certainly hope so. What’s interesting to me is that here we are, having evolved millions of years, yet the male species cannot seem to get it through their heads (females, too, but to a lesser degree) that the Roman Church had it right from the beginning (but of course, who else?), avoid the “occasion of sin.” That’s the clue. Human biology forces bonding between two people so involved, and then there is little possibility for avoiding the occasion. It’s almost time that homo sapiens woke up and learned how to “fly right.” No! Left!
By C jay on 11/10/2008 8:53 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe
The “Roman Church?” “Sin”? How about the fact that some people simply think that they can have it all? Hubris–––inflated ego–––stupidity––and all the rest. Let’s leave “sin” to those who live in glass houses and pray a lot.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 11/10/2008 5:12 pm
HA BIBI
Do we even need to ask such a question? As if anyone with any intelligence couldn’t see that, “Of coures not” When our public leaders, especially those that are there to fight the very crimes they themselves are found engaged in, well that begs the different question of why are they not punished for the same crimes others in less profiled positions of shame are?
By HA BIBI on 11/10/2008 9:03 am
John G
absolutely!
By John G on 11/10/2008 10:51 am
Rita T
Why is it that women are arrested for being prostitutes, but the men who paid for their services are only rarely arrested? If they both are participating in the illegal act, shouldn’t they both go to jail — every time? It strikes me as both unfair and sexist!
By Rita T on 11/10/2008 12:35 pm