116 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Is that true about Joni Evans? Then that makes sense. I have not posted much lately because the postings and comments leave me with a bad taste in my mouth. It is starting to make sense now.
While I have not joined any "group" or hurled "invective" I have been privately boycotting the site as I have noticed a definite change in tone. The phrasing of this poll is but one example of the nasty turn in direction. I will contine to check back periodically to test the waters.
Marva Marva, I agree with you, I find that the tone most of the time is negative and hostile and very few people write things that are informative that allow us to grow and learn from them! I enjoy different peoples views, but please…. be positive and accurate and no name calling!
I am finding, also, that any thread that is political in nature is piled on at the start with nasty, "Coulterest" invective. Not discussion or observations, NOTHING worth commenting on, so I leave. Where once there was a healthy give and take ( remember the primaries ? ) , now is high-fives and conspiracy theory. After they all congratulate themselves the thread ends.
Unfortunate.
If Joni Evans plan was to "tabloid-ize" this site, it has been a failure.
The President has give better speeches but it is the content that matters… not how he said it.
President Obama identified his three main goals. First, he wants to give every youth in America the chance to obtain a college degree. Second, he wants American to become energy independent and third, he wants to try to improve our health care system to something that might actually be nationalized health care, but not defined as such. The first two goals are laudable, to a degree. The goal to revamp the health care system is also laudable if we do not attempt nationalization of the industry. Something has to be done, but we shall have to wait and see what is actually the plan proposed.
As for giving every child the chance for a college education….I am skeptical. There is no doubt that America does not have enough youth in college studying mathematics or the sciences. If the plan is to encourage (which means pay for) students who plan to study those disciplines than I am more in favor of such a bill. However, there are millions and millions of American youth who have no desire to attend college or do not have the academic skills to graduate. These are the youth that need our attention. These children move into the drug trade, hang around parking lots or remain in their homes playing computer games or become single Moms. Do they contribute to society or are they takers. Most are neither but all are in need of help. We need a huge effort to create businesses or even industries that can employ Americans who are not college educated.
As for energy independence, we shall wait and see if Americans will buy hybrid automobiles. Some of the other energy independence solutions which include wind, nuclear, solar, "clean" coal, etc. will have to be judged on the individual proposals that are offered.
Overall, I think the President had some good moments in the speech. But I do not think he persuaded many skeptics that the "stimulus bill" will be what he hopes it will be. Nor, do I think he persuaded many that future spending bills will be received with either enthusiasm or approval.
Bonnie: I think the President had some good moments in the speech.
Excellent article. I enjoy having my morning coffee with your thoughts — better than a newspaper.
You are correct in your assessment about sending every kid to college. In Massachusetts, every child who does well on the MCAS testing in their senior year, receives a scholarship to a state university. This was a Romney thing which turned to be a mixed blessing for some, because as it turns out, the fees, books, etc. cost as much as the tuition. And some kids don’t do well in the big state colleges where supervision is sketchy.
What I think would help for many kids are more trade schools. In my small town, the nearest good trade school is an hour away by school bus. Kids have to get up at some ungodly dark hour of a winter’s morning to start their school day on a cranky old bus. Many kids drop out and revert back to regular high school or while away the time until they reach 16 and can get a job at MacDonalds.
Not everybody is a book learner, but good and ample trade schools would produce all the plumbers and electricians and technicians of all sorts that a society needs. And this can be done at a high school level.
Marjorie, while I generally don’t agree with what I perceive to be your conservative politics, I have to say that you’ve hit the nail on the head.
There are some kids that just are not "university material"; that are much more mechanically inclined. There are still manufacturing jobs in America (watch John Ratzenberger’s "Made in America" on cable TV).
I’ve spent the last 30 years as a sewage treatment plant operator, making more money than most of the kids I graduated from high school with who went on to college. Of course, many of them (especially the guys who wanted to avoid the draft) went for what were considered "easy ride" degrees; liberal arts & political science. Some of those kids ended up in low-level sales clerk jobs; one I know could only find work at McDonald’s.
Fortunately, there is a good technical & trades high school here, & the public tech college sysytem is good, too.
As you said, the world is always going to need plumbers, electricians, lathe operators, (& sewage treatment operators). I sincerely hope the president’s vision of a college education for every kid includes tech & trade schools.
There are some kids that just are not "university material"; that are much more mechanically inclined. >
Children have different learning styles, and good teachers recognize them. I don’t think it’s fair to kids to preclude they’re not "university material". Imo, it’s fine if they want to learn a trade in high school, but they shouldn’t be pushed into it.
Although, I think the most important lines of his speech were the ones where he told parents to turn off the TV and read to their kids, and that dropping out of High School was dropping out on the country. Maybe if more parents and students were serious they would do better in college.
I enjoyed your remarks about trade schools etc. I think, as a country, we have to start thinking about the kids who have zero interest in computers or higher education. Trade schools - hundreds of them sound like a good start.
President Obama was very clear to include vocational and trade schools in his speech. As a youth development specialist, I was pleased that he included these notions. And I support his efforts to encourage post-secondary education and funding assistance. I have come to terms with having to pay back my student loans for the rest of my life. However, if we can figure out a way for future generations not to be saddled with such debt I am all for it.
Wow, do I agree with you on the trade schools angle! There is such a crying need for people, men and women, to serve us in areas others do not want to do, and yet they could do well, if only they were trained, and I speak of such vocations as plumbers, carpet layers, mechanics, and the like. If society gave all trades the recognition they deserve, we would all benefit.
I had a good friend in high school (and this is back in the 1960s) who had taken all the auto shop classes, because she knew she wanted to be a mechanic in a local garage. She got a job the day after high school graduation, and I am sure she is doing well now. Could be she even owns a chain of auto repair shops!
Here in the Rocky Mountain region there was a woman by the name of Emily Griffith, who in the early 1900s began an "Opportunity School", to allow those who wanted a trade to have the chance to do something other than college. We are NOT all needed in colleges, as our gifts and talents may lie in areas of direct service, such as the trades, and I welcome more schools such as Emily’s. It is still in existence, and offers classes in auto mechanics, cosmetology, dressmaking, ESL, Licensed Practical Nursing, Computers, and the culinary arts. Many of the graduates leave the Opportunity School and go on to waiting employment, as the school has an excellent reputation for high standards and achievement.
In the Middle Ages, guilds were begun, and served societies with craftsmen and women who would train, apprentice, and go on to high quality production. We would not have glassmakers, for example, without the guilds, which still serve Europe so well today.
Given the necessity for our country to compete on a global scale today, I disagree with your last comment—I think our children need a high school education, so that they can read well (and hopefully enjoy it for its own sake!), do calculations necessary for daily basic skills of life (without use of a calculator, please!), and get some appreciation of the arts and science in general, either biology or other kinds of science. Then, after the basic skills of life are inculcated, they might be able to go on to pursue their aspirations, whether that be the trades or studies best gained in colleges and universities.
Thanks, WOW, for a chance to express this opinion. Not too often do I get a chance to root for trade schools, but I dearly feel they are lacking and we need to bring them back.
Not everybody is a book learner, but good and ample trade schools would produce all the plumbers and electricians and technicians of all sorts that a society needs. >
If we want children to be book learners, they need to be introduced to books in their earliest years — infancy is not too soon — so that when they get to elementary school, they’ll be ready for learning.
And they deserve fiscal equality in public schools. We can’t expect children to succeed academically if they don’t have the tools to work with. Imo, too many teens wind up learning a trade because their elementary schools are deficient.
Bonnie — I agree, overall, there were some good moments. I would like for the President and his administration to address the issue regarding the Manufacturing sector of this country. My reasoning is possibly of a selfist nature, because our small business sells to manufacturing companies. At the present time, in a recent survey in our area — 200 small business selling to the manufacturing community- 80 have filed for bankruptcy - 60 believe that they will also have to file before the end of 2009 — another 60 are barely hanging on and are cutting back on employees.
Our economic competitiveness is threatened when we lose the edge on crucial skills and cutting-edge technologies. We are losing engineers - both technical and design. This brings us back to the jobs issue, and what fields of employment will be viable today, and for the children in the future. Makes me wonder if manufacturing design, and engineering, is a vanishing field in this country.
I believe the loss of American manufacturing jobs have meant hardships for families, and entire communities. We see more closed and abandonded buildings, lost retirement pensions, lost hope.
Many of these manufacturing jobs have been moved to foreign countries because the taxes, in this country,on these companies, are outrageous. Thereby, no incentive by the companies to remain, and manufacture, in this country. If some of these taxes were lifted and some of these companies would relocate in America it would mean an instant 13 million dollars, and that is a low assessment, that could be added to our economy each year. And, the jobs it would create would certainly be a enthusiastic punch for this country.
116 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Is that true about Joni Evans? Then that makes sense. I have not posted much lately because the postings and comments leave me with a bad taste in my mouth. It is starting to make sense now.
Seems to be, if you believe Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joni_Evans
As you can see, she also represents more charming people, like Liz Smith and Peggy Noonan.
There is some group that has ganged up here to hurl invective. I am not sure why. I don’t think they are having much fun.
While I have not joined any "group" or hurled "invective" I have been privately boycotting the site as I have noticed a definite change in tone. The phrasing of this poll is but one example of the nasty turn in direction. I will contine to check back periodically to test the waters.
Marva Marva, I agree with you, I find that the tone most of the time is negative and hostile and very few people write things that are informative that allow us to grow and learn from them! I enjoy different peoples views, but please…. be positive and accurate and no name calling!
I am finding, also, that any thread that is political in nature is piled on at the start with nasty, "Coulterest" invective. Not discussion or observations, NOTHING worth commenting on, so I leave. Where once there was a healthy give and take ( remember the primaries ? ) , now is high-fives and conspiracy theory. After they all congratulate themselves the thread ends.
Unfortunate.
If Joni Evans plan was to "tabloid-ize" this site, it has been a failure.
The President has give better speeches but it is the content that matters… not how he said it.
President Obama identified his three main goals. First, he wants to give every youth in America the chance to obtain a college degree. Second, he wants American to become energy independent and third, he wants to try to improve our health care system to something that might actually be nationalized health care, but not defined as such. The first two goals are laudable, to a degree. The goal to revamp the health care system is also laudable if we do not attempt nationalization of the industry. Something has to be done, but we shall have to wait and see what is actually the plan proposed.
As for giving every child the chance for a college education….I am skeptical. There is no doubt that America does not have enough youth in college studying mathematics or the sciences. If the plan is to encourage (which means pay for) students who plan to study those disciplines than I am more in favor of such a bill. However, there are millions and millions of American youth who have no desire to attend college or do not have the academic skills to graduate. These are the youth that need our attention. These children move into the drug trade, hang around parking lots or remain in their homes playing computer games or become single Moms. Do they contribute to society or are they takers. Most are neither but all are in need of help. We need a huge effort to create businesses or even industries that can employ Americans who are not college educated.
As for energy independence, we shall wait and see if Americans will buy hybrid automobiles. Some of the other energy independence solutions which include wind, nuclear, solar, "clean" coal, etc. will have to be judged on the individual proposals that are offered.
Overall, I think the President had some good moments in the speech. But I do not think he persuaded many skeptics that the "stimulus bill" will be what he hopes it will be. Nor, do I think he persuaded many that future spending bills will be received with either enthusiasm or approval.
Bonnie: I think the President had some good moments in the speech.
Excellent article. I enjoy having my morning coffee with your thoughts — better than a newspaper.
You are correct in your assessment about sending every kid to college. In Massachusetts, every child who does well on the MCAS testing in their senior year, receives a scholarship to a state university. This was a Romney thing which turned to be a mixed blessing for some, because as it turns out, the fees, books, etc. cost as much as the tuition. And some kids don’t do well in the big state colleges where supervision is sketchy.
What I think would help for many kids are more trade schools. In my small town, the nearest good trade school is an hour away by school bus. Kids have to get up at some ungodly dark hour of a winter’s morning to start their school day on a cranky old bus. Many kids drop out and revert back to regular high school or while away the time until they reach 16 and can get a job at MacDonalds.
Not everybody is a book learner, but good and ample trade schools would produce all the plumbers and electricians and technicians of all sorts that a society needs. And this can be done at a high school level.
Marjorie, while I generally don’t agree with what I perceive to be your conservative politics, I have to say that you’ve hit the nail on the head.
There are some kids that just are not "university material"; that are much more mechanically inclined. There are still manufacturing jobs in America (watch John Ratzenberger’s "Made in America" on cable TV).
I’ve spent the last 30 years as a sewage treatment plant operator, making more money than most of the kids I graduated from high school with who went on to college. Of course, many of them (especially the guys who wanted to avoid the draft) went for what were considered "easy ride" degrees; liberal arts & political science. Some of those kids ended up in low-level sales clerk jobs; one I know could only find work at McDonald’s.
Fortunately, there is a good technical & trades high school here, & the public tech college sysytem is good, too.
As you said, the world is always going to need plumbers, electricians, lathe operators, (& sewage treatment operators). I sincerely hope the president’s vision of a college education for every kid includes tech & trade schools.Children have different learning styles, and good teachers recognize them. I don’t think it’s fair to kids to preclude they’re not "university material". Imo, it’s fine if they want to learn a trade in high school, but they shouldn’t be pushed into it.
Marjorie, I agree with you also.
Although, I think the most important lines of his speech were the ones where he told parents to turn off the TV and read to their kids, and that dropping out of High School was dropping out on the country. Maybe if more parents and students were serious they would do better in college.
But your point is a good one
Hello Marjorie C. -
I enjoyed your remarks about trade schools etc. I think, as a country, we have to start thinking about the kids who have zero interest in computers or higher education. Trade schools - hundreds of them sound like a good start.
Marjorie,
Wow, do I agree with you on the trade schools angle! There is such a crying need for people, men and women, to serve us in areas others do not want to do, and yet they could do well, if only they were trained, and I speak of such vocations as plumbers, carpet layers, mechanics, and the like. If society gave all trades the recognition they deserve, we would all benefit.
I had a good friend in high school (and this is back in the 1960s) who had taken all the auto shop classes, because she knew she wanted to be a mechanic in a local garage. She got a job the day after high school graduation, and I am sure she is doing well now. Could be she even owns a chain of auto repair shops!
Here in the Rocky Mountain region there was a woman by the name of Emily Griffith, who in the early 1900s began an "Opportunity School", to allow those who wanted a trade to have the chance to do something other than college. We are NOT all needed in colleges, as our gifts and talents may lie in areas of direct service, such as the trades, and I welcome more schools such as Emily’s. It is still in existence, and offers classes in auto mechanics, cosmetology, dressmaking, ESL, Licensed Practical Nursing, Computers, and the culinary arts. Many of the graduates leave the Opportunity School and go on to waiting employment, as the school has an excellent reputation for high standards and achievement.
In the Middle Ages, guilds were begun, and served societies with craftsmen and women who would train, apprentice, and go on to high quality production. We would not have glassmakers, for example, without the guilds, which still serve Europe so well today.
Given the necessity for our country to compete on a global scale today, I disagree with your last comment—I think our children need a high school education, so that they can read well (and hopefully enjoy it for its own sake!), do calculations necessary for daily basic skills of life (without use of a calculator, please!), and get some appreciation of the arts and science in general, either biology or other kinds of science. Then, after the basic skills of life are inculcated, they might be able to go on to pursue their aspirations, whether that be the trades or studies best gained in colleges and universities.
Thanks, WOW, for a chance to express this opinion. Not too often do I get a chance to root for trade schools, but I dearly feel they are lacking and we need to bring them back.
If we want children to be book learners, they need to be introduced to books in their earliest years — infancy is not too soon — so that when they get to elementary school, they’ll be ready for learning.
And they deserve fiscal equality in public schools. We can’t expect children to succeed academically if they don’t have the tools to work with. Imo, too many teens wind up learning a trade because their elementary schools are deficient.
Bonnie — I agree, overall, there were some good moments. I would like for the President and his administration to address the issue regarding the Manufacturing sector of this country. My reasoning is possibly of a selfist nature, because our small business sells to manufacturing companies. At the present time, in a recent survey in our area — 200 small business selling to the manufacturing community- 80 have filed for bankruptcy - 60 believe that they will also have to file before the end of 2009 — another 60 are barely hanging on and are cutting back on employees.
Our economic competitiveness is threatened when we lose the edge on crucial skills and cutting-edge technologies. We are losing engineers - both technical and design. This brings us back to the jobs issue, and what fields of employment will be viable today, and for the children in the future. Makes me wonder if manufacturing design, and engineering, is a vanishing field in this country.
I believe the loss of American manufacturing jobs have meant hardships for families, and entire communities. We see more closed and abandonded buildings, lost retirement pensions, lost hope.
Many of these manufacturing jobs have been moved to foreign countries because the taxes, in this country,on these companies, are outrageous. Thereby, no incentive by the companies to remain, and manufacture, in this country. If some of these taxes were lifted and some of these companies would relocate in America it would mean an instant 13 million dollars, and that is a low assessment, that could be added to our economy each year. And, the jobs it would create would certainly be a enthusiastic punch for this country.