You straight people are really nuts. “Believing” or not “believing” in them isn’t the point. Why are you marrying people you don’t trust and who don’t trust you? If the issue came up for me, that would be the end of the relationship. Nanny Fine wouldn’t sign one, and neither would I.
Believing is probably not the right word. We “believe” in Santa Claus.
I’m like you, Mugsy. When Bill and I decided to marry back in ‘86, we didn’t have one because we were on one page as to how we should handle our affairs, and we trusted each other completely. However, we did have our wills, poa’s, living wills drawn up. I can see having to have one if Prince Albert of Monaco proposes to me or something, but I somehow don’t think I’m on his short list.
Mugsy,
I hate to turn this thread back into something Political but……..
EIGHT years ago, half the Americans put their trust into someone they thought they
could believe in……Look what it got them and all the rest of us who didn’t believe.
I wish we could have had a Pre Nup and made him pay us all back for what he took away from us.
Sorry I couldn’t resist.
I didn’t have a Pre Nup when I married my husband. But neither of us were Wealthy. If we had been it would have
been prudent to have one. I dont think of it as a trust matter. I think it just makes good sense to protect
your assets.
I did own a home when I married my husband and I waited until after we were married for 10 years
before I added his name to the ownership documents. I had two children to care for and wanted to protect their rights.
Mugsy - while I totaly disagree with you as to the question of the day (per a different post). I LOVE you’re “you straight people are really nuts”. Had a great laugh out loud with my coffe this a.m!
I believe pre-nups depend upon the individual situation. Most couples don’t have an excess of wealth that needs to be dealt with before a marriage. On the other hand, if one or both members of the union are extremely wealthy, lots of liquid assets, homes, equities, etc., they need to probably have their lawyers(each need his/her own to protect individual interests). The way I would prefer it is to draw up wills, poa’s , living wills, that will reflect the desires of the individual. And, this is true, especially if there are minor children involved. As for older women like myself, frankly, unless I were to end up with a very wealthy man, I really do not see the sense of getting married at my age. I am very leery of co-mingling funds, my assets will go to my kids regardless, as a woman, I would have to go to all the name change trouble, medicare and social security, equitiy funds would all have to be changed, plus I own my house. God, it’s not worth the trouble. I’ll do like grandmother did 35 or 40 yrs. ago, and live in sin(much to the judgemental chagrin of her offspring).
Well, Diana, as I said, Nanny Fine didn’t sign one. If people “of means” can’t be bothered with us “hoi polloi” without making sure we don’t “take advantage of them,” they aren’t my kind of people. End of story.
Fran Drescher, the fabulously funny comedian of whom we see precious little, did a series called “The Nanny,” which plays like “I Love Lucy” perpetually on some cable channel or other, in which she starred as Franny Fine, the Nanny. She spent five years in love with her boss, Maxwell Sheffield, and when he finally proposed, he asked her to sign a prenup. Nope. Not. Eventually, he saw the error of his ways, and tore it up.
Mugsy,
The only reason I would ever have a pre-nup is to protect myself from unscrupulous offspring of the Apollo I had fallen for, written by someone representing my best interests and gladly supported by that one perfect man.
56 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment