Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Poll | 09/16/2008 12:00 am

On the subject of prenups, you:

Read more about: Divorce, Money, Relationships, Weddings

56 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Mugsy Peabody
You straight people are really nuts. “Believing” or not “believing” in them isn’t the point. Why are you marrying people you don’t trust and who don’t trust you? If the issue came up for me, that would be the end of the relationship. Nanny Fine wouldn’t sign one, and neither would I.
By Mugsy Peabody on 09/16/2008 12:09 am
Diana T
Believing is probably not the right word. We “believe” in Santa Claus. I’m like you, Mugsy. When Bill and I decided to marry back in ‘86, we didn’t have one because we were on one page as to how we should handle our affairs, and we trusted each other completely. However, we did have our wills, poa’s, living wills drawn up. I can see having to have one if Prince Albert of Monaco proposes to me or something, but I somehow don’t think I’m on his short list.
By Diana T on 09/16/2008 12:19 am
Dona Howlett
Mugsy, I hate to turn this thread back into something Political but…….. EIGHT years ago, half the Americans put their trust into someone they thought they could believe in……Look what it got them and all the rest of us who didn’t believe. I wish we could have had a Pre Nup and made him pay us all back for what he took away from us. Sorry I couldn’t resist. I didn’t have a Pre Nup when I married my husband. But neither of us were Wealthy. If we had been it would have been prudent to have one. I dont think of it as a trust matter. I think it just makes good sense to protect your assets. I did own a home when I married my husband and I waited until after we were married for 10 years before I added his name to the ownership documents. I had two children to care for and wanted to protect their rights.
By Dona Howlett on 09/16/2008 1:12 am
Mugsy Peabody
Dona, thoughtful as usual…
By Mugsy Peabody on 09/16/2008 1:30 am
Chrome Toe
Mugsy - while I totaly disagree with you as to the question of the day (per a different post). I LOVE you’re “you straight people are really nuts”. Had a great laugh out loud with my coffe this a.m!
By Chrome Toe on 09/16/2008 9:10 am
Mugsy Peabody
Glad to be of service.
By Mugsy Peabody on 09/16/2008 2:10 pm
K O
Mugsy, that’s the funniest thing I’ve read in forever.
By K O on 09/16/2008 11:17 am
Susan Gabriel
I love your candor on this one, Mugsy. Do you think Ellen made Portia sign a pre-nup? I hope not.
By Susan Gabriel on 09/16/2008 3:36 pm
Mugsy Peabody
I don’t know. But I suspect she would be fair.
By Mugsy Peabody on 09/16/2008 5:41 pm
Diana T
I believe pre-nups depend upon the individual situation. Most couples don’t have an excess of wealth that needs to be dealt with before a marriage. On the other hand, if one or both members of the union are extremely wealthy, lots of liquid assets, homes, equities, etc., they need to probably have their lawyers(each need his/her own to protect individual interests). The way I would prefer it is to draw up wills, poa’s , living wills, that will reflect the desires of the individual. And, this is true, especially if there are minor children involved. As for older women like myself, frankly, unless I were to end up with a very wealthy man, I really do not see the sense of getting married at my age. I am very leery of co-mingling funds, my assets will go to my kids regardless, as a woman, I would have to go to all the name change trouble, medicare and social security, equitiy funds would all have to be changed, plus I own my house. God, it’s not worth the trouble. I’ll do like grandmother did 35 or 40 yrs. ago, and live in sin(much to the judgemental chagrin of her offspring).
By Diana T on 09/16/2008 12:16 am
Mugsy Peabody
Well, Diana, as I said, Nanny Fine didn’t sign one. If people “of means” can’t be bothered with us “hoi polloi” without making sure we don’t “take advantage of them,” they aren’t my kind of people. End of story.
By Mugsy Peabody on 09/16/2008 12:52 am
Tick Pyne
Hi again, Mugsy. Sorry, but who is Nanny Fine?
By Tick Pyne on 09/16/2008 5:58 am
Mugsy Peabody
Fran Drescher, the fabulously funny comedian of whom we see precious little, did a series called “The Nanny,” which plays like “I Love Lucy” perpetually on some cable channel or other, in which she starred as Franny Fine, the Nanny. She spent five years in love with her boss, Maxwell Sheffield, and when he finally proposed, he asked her to sign a prenup. Nope. Not. Eventually, he saw the error of his ways, and tore it up.
By Mugsy Peabody on 09/16/2008 2:07 pm
Diana T
Mugsy, The only reason I would ever have a pre-nup is to protect myself from unscrupulous offspring of the Apollo I had fallen for, written by someone representing my best interests and gladly supported by that one perfect man.
By Diana T on 09/16/2008 9:47 am
Mugsy Peabody
The one perfect man has “unscrupulous offspring?” How’d THAT happen???? Anyway, point taken.
By Mugsy Peabody on 09/16/2008 2:11 pm