No one job prepares you to be president. You need to have the ability to listen, the major problem is most people don’t feel represented and don’t vote and the media only presents two parties opinions. This is a large diverse country and any candidates preconceived agenda’s should be set aside until it is determined what is good for the country as a whole.
It took me 20 years experience in my industry to prepare me to be president of my company. So, let me see, if it took me 20 years to manage 1/2 billion dollars, how many years would it take to manage 3.1 trillion dollars. Let’s see here, it looks like 124,280 years experience would be about right.
On the other hand, ability to communicate a clear vision, motivate and manage people - and the wisdom to hire and retain the best minds in the country - may be a pretty good start…
Hi Phyllis,
Mr. Kitty, who was an advertising executive for much of his career, recently pointed out that candidates are “branded” much in the way products were when he was creating advertising campaigns. He noted that McCain/Palin’s brand appeared to be “Maverick” and “Reformer,” which would necessitate Palin to take the position that she turned down the “bridge to nowhere” money, as a reformer. It has nothing to do with truth - and everything to do with branding.
Interesting point of view, no?
I think I’m falling in love with Mr. Kitty–––even if he can’t find that darn remote. I think he’s right, truth gets lost amidst all the clever connivings.
Thanks for the link. Love Paul Krugman:
“I’d argue, is that the Obama campaign is wrong to suggest that a McCain-Palin administration would just be a continuation of Bush-Cheney. If the way John McCain and Sarah Palin are campaigning is any indication, it would be much, much worse.”
My thought exactly thousands fold. They are outlandish liars.
Because global dynamics change rapidly, each Presidency is unlike before it. The most basic requirements, in the 21st century, should include a working knowledge of national politics and a realistic assessment of America’s position in the world community. This body of knowledge can’t be acquired overnight; it must come from an accumulated understanding of how the federal government works and where it can be improved. In 2008, we have a far more complex and challenging political environment than that of even four years ago.
Our national debt has reached numbers we can’t wrap our minds around, the dollar is weaker than it’s ever been, our global relationships have deteriorated dramatically, and we are involved in a futile war. The “preparedness” for the Presidency should include wisdom, skilled diplomacy, prudence, strength of character and the ability to choose a strong team of advisers to fill the Cabinet. Bellicosity, “either/or” thinking, and shallowness of character will only lead the U.S. into further chaos. We need to take this election more seriously than any before it because the next President will either begin to pull America out of the fire or push the country towards a rapid meltdown. No single job can best prepare one for the Presidency, but, this time around, a position and background in national government is critical.
I don’t feel there is an education or prior work experience that would prepare anyone as leader of any country. Common sense, morality, intuitive skills, organizational skills, ability to work with a team, ability to work well under pressure and excellent communication skills should all be job requirements.
Lise, that sounds like a generic description for pre-school teacher. (Not to denegrate pre-school teachers. They are wonderful.) Don’t you think that there’s a bit more to the job than that???
No, I don’t. Some of the best world leaders were peasants with little or no education. The lawyers, the poli-sci, the economists, the Harvard grads have done no better than the common person. In fact, I feel that the common person would do a better job as they are in touch with reality. Most politicians today have led very priveledged lives and have never wanted for anything in their lives, hence they cannot relate to living hand to mouth or paying Peter with Paul’s money. Many of today’s politicians feel that the ‘book learned’ education they had been given (not worked for) makes them more qualified then someone who has actually had to budget money to make ends meet, solve a disagreement on a town council, cut a deal with a car dealership, watch a family member die because they couldn’t afford proper treatment, and is over all well educated with life.
71 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment