Politics | 02/23/2009 12:55 pm
'Bikini Reporter' Amy Jacobson Wins Big Hurdle in CBS Lawsuit

A Chicago-based NBC reporter who sued CBS for airing a controversial video of her in a bikini is winning her battle against the media giant.
Amy Jacobson, who once worked for Chicago’s NBC channel 5 news, filed a lawsuit against a local CBS-owned station, WBBM, on channel 2, for airing a six-minute video of her in a bikini at a house of a man whose wife mysteriously disappeared. The video showed Jacobson and her children attending a pool party on July 6, 2007 at Craig Stebic’s home. At the time, Jacobson had been covering the April 2007 disappearance of Stebic’s estranged wife, Lisa, according to the lawsuit filed by her attorney.
The video allegedly cost Jacobson her job, and the paycut forced her and her husband to sell their "dream" home, the suit read. The suit also said that the negative publicity from the footage made it impossible for Jacobson to find a new job.
Associate Cook County Judge Elizabeth Budzinski upheld four of Jacobson’s eight counts, dismissed three without prejudice (which allows for re-filing of the case in the future) and dismissed just one count. You can read the decision here [PDF].
Jacobson’s attorney, Kathleen Zellner, filed the over million-dollar lawsuit against CBS, as well as the president and general manager of the CBS-owned station, Joseph Ahern . The controversial video isn’t readily available on the Internet, but this screenshot is reportedly from the video and can be seen by clicking here.
Here’s a breakdown of the decision, via Chicagoist…
• Count I - "Intrustion upon seclusion" - count dismissed without prejudice
• Count II - "False Light" - upheld
• Count III - "Violation of Illinois Right of Publicity Act" - count dismissed with prejudice
• Count IV - "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress" - upheld
• Count V - "Defamation per se" - upheld
• Count VI - "Defamation per quod" - upheld
• Count VII - "Tortious interference with a business relationship" - count dismissed without prejudice
• Count VIII - "Tortious interference with a business expectancy" - count dismissed without prejudice























16 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Article didn’t say if this party was a fund raiser. If it was a fund raiser to help this guy to find his wife. Than I could understand why she was there.
I don’t think she has the right to win. She is a celebrity in her own town. I think all news should be reported. If she wins then it report only bias news not all news.
As a person from Chicago, I am well aware of that video and why she was fired. It had nothing to do with the fact that she was in a bikini. It was that she was in a bikini attending a party at the home of a man who was being investigated for suspicion of murdering his wife and this reporter was supposed to be covering the story.
This was about ethics, not a bikini. The article here is very misleading.
I remember the story…. when I heard about it I thought that she was in the wrong….
Unless she was involved in the murder, it shouldnt have been national news…. but then I think that a lot of the national news shouldnt be news either.
Local news is a whole different issue.