Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Entertainment | 07/31/2008 10:20 am

How Much Is Your Underwear Worth?

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Samantha Rhodes modelling a pair of Queen Victoria's knickers © AP

How much money would you pay for a pair of Queen Victoria’s underpants?

One Canadian woman this week decided $9,000 was a good amount. Before the auction, they were valued at $1,100.

The buyer of the 50-inch-waist knickers won the knits at a central England auction on Wednesday. Auctioneer Charles Hanson said Queen Victoria’s bloomers belonged to "a very big lady of quite small stature with a very wide girth." The UK’s longest-reigning monarch, who lived from 1819 to 1901 and became queen at the tender age of 18, was said to be five feet tall.

The Daily Telegraph recently reported that the size of the skivvies is just more proof that the Queen had become "morbidly obese" toward the end of her life; the average British woman’s waist size today is 33 inches.

The royal handmade drawers — which date back to the 1890s — bear the monogram "VR" for Victoria Regina, and are open-crotch style, with separate legs joined by a drawstring at the waist. That style was popular in the late Victorian era. Perhaps that’s because it made it slightly easier to use the loo when ladies had to wear the various layers of garments in that day and age?

"These pants, considering their provenance and pedigree, are very exciting," Hanson told the Associated Press.

The queen’s chemise, with a 66-inch bust, sold for $8,000, while her nightgown sold for $11,000. Both were valued at $600 each.

Vanessa Savage of Hanson’s Auctioneers, said the knickers had been kept preserved for decades by a family in western England whose ancestor was one of the Queen’s servants.

"They may not look too regal at first glance, but their provenance is concrete," she told the Telegraph.

17 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

doll lady
The cost of my underwear????? Here is my answer for my underpants. Yesterday monring I would have laughed and laughed: ha ha ha ha ha ha They weren’t worth a hoot. But this morning I just opened a new package of 3 pair for $4.00 brand spanking new, and in colors, underpants. I am the queen for the day…..getting to wear a brand new pair of panties. LOL
By doll lady on 07/31/2008 9:46 am
Diana T
66” bust? 50” waist? Goodness gracious, she was rather large wasn’t she.
By Diana T on 07/31/2008 9:51 am
Frank Peterson
She wasn’t like that when she married Albert—she actually from photos quite fetching—as she became older she put on considerable weight and the knickers show, but that was after Albert’s death—her figure was a bit like an old fashioned wooden beer barrel though, wasn’t it :-)
By Frank Peterson on 07/31/2008 10:22 am
Diana T
Merciful heavens, a gracious plenty…
By Diana T on 07/31/2008 10:46 am
Frank Peterson
Your very nice understatement of the day, Diana :-) I believe in the day she was referred to as being “stout”. Exercise was not an option for many women in the Victorian era and all those layers of crinolines hid an array of…how do I put this politely…plumpness?? Actually your “gracious plenty” sounds much nicer than “fat”—boy she was that alright :-)
By Frank Peterson on 07/31/2008 11:02 am
Diana T
As I said to my friend, Abbe, the other day, Frank, my weight never changes, just my height. Or, what is the refrigerator magnet say…I’m not overweight, I’m undertall…
By Diana T on 07/31/2008 11:10 am
Frank Peterson
Lovely :-)—I never ever mention a woman’s heft, and frankly from the first picture your post you looked just fine to this old geezer. quite lovely actually.—within the last year and 1/2 I lost 50 lbs; went from 225+ to 170 which is a bit low considering my height at 5’ 10”—I think I’m about 178 now and I feel the girth intruding on my belt notch already—so it’s time to lose those 6 lbs. I do feel better than I have for ages for the weight loss and the loss I did sensibly for me :-) You wouldn’t believe my diet if I told you—it would horrify most people—certainly raised a lot of eyebrows ar the time. But it worked lol
By Frank Peterson on 07/31/2008 11:22 am
Diana T
Well, Frank, I’ve always said it’s easier for a man to lose weight than a woman. I am always fighting the perpetual 20 lbs. Thank heaven, I am very fit and can walk indefinitely. Weights help, as well as the garden. My diet is to eat healthy. My one bad habit? chocolate…ummmm.
By Diana T on 07/31/2008 12:31 pm
Frank Peterson
My one bad habit? Beer—a good ale or three and I’m a happy man ;-)—I used to over indulge considerably after Anne’s death but I’m a lot more careful now. My eating habits are generally alright but I do need more leafy veggies. And that is really curious now I think on it because I love salads. Hmmmm —better hit the store and stock up. :-) Exercise? I try to walk at least 1-3 miles daily but give a good book or this computer and I can get sedentary fast. Computer’s worst of all for I love communicating on it. It’s a life line in so many ways to other people like you and the others here. I don’t know what I’d do without it.
By Frank Peterson on 07/31/2008 12:49 pm
J B
Ah, I remember the days when I bought all of my undies etc. at Victoria’s Secret…the bra and undies always matched etc…now? Not so much! When you go from buying your undies at Victoria’s Secret to buying them at Costco…you’ve turned a corner! But damn, they’re comfy!
By J B on 07/31/2008 11:46 am
Mugsy Peabody
To whom?
By Mugsy Peabody on 07/31/2008 12:26 pm
Diana T
Mugsy, you are priceless!
By Diana T on 07/31/2008 1:28 pm
Mugsy Peabody
As my underwear will remain. I only promise that it is clean (for my mother’s sake) in case of accident.
By Mugsy Peabody on 07/31/2008 4:16 pm
Zera Lee
I do not believe I shall be querying eBay as to the value of my unmentionables. All I will say is that the value goes up when I leave the house.
By Zera Lee on 07/31/2008 1:21 pm
Jeannot Kensinger
A “hole in one” is not just for golfers, seems to be the statement for each of my Hanes cover ups. So I could not get a penny for one pair.
By Jeannot Kensinger on 08/01/2008 11:47 am