Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 02/04/2009 9:45 am

Obama Seeks Salary Cap for Bailed-Out Bank Execs

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

Executives whose companies received bailout bucks should expect to see smaller paychecks soon.

President Obama today imposed a $500,000 pay cap on executives whose firms receive government financial rescue funds. He made the official announcement this morning, ahead of next week’s unveiling of a new framework for spending what remains of the $700 billion financial rescue fund. The rules will force greater transparency on the use of corporate jets, office renovations and holiday parties, as well as any big financial packages executives may get when they leave companies.

"For top executives to award themselves these kinds of compensation packages in the midst of this economic crisis isn’t just bad taste - it’s a bad strategy - and I will not tolerate it as president," Obama said at the White House with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. "We’re going to be demanding some restraint in exchange for federal aid — so that when firms seek new federal dollars, we won’t find them up to the same old tricks."

The rules apply to companies that receive "exceptional financial recovery assistance" - like AIG, Bank of America, Chrysler, General Motors and Citigroup. Exceptions can be made for some grants of stock or other long-term incentives.

"We’ve now learned that people are still getting huge bonuses despite the fact that they’re getting taxpayer money, which, I think, infuriates the public," Obama told CNN Tuesday. It sure infuriates us, as well as the hard-working people paying for that bailout!

The move isn’t altogether unexpected. After all, despite the banks begging, hat in hand, for a government handout — courtesy of the American taxpayers — we’re still hearing about things like Citigroup spending $50 million on a new jet, and how Wall Street handed out $18 billion in bonuses last year. Obama called that latter move "shameful." Then there’s the news today that Wells Fargo — which got $25 billion in bailout money — canceled a pricey Las Vegas casino trip for employees only after a mountain of criticism came in. Will these guys ever learn?!

 

105 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Libra Lady
eleanor…and they are still there…crooks that they are….that’s what gets me so riled up….then they point fingers at the repubs….kool aid is much to strong I think.
By Libra Lady on 02/04/2009 11:48 pm
starry Nite
eleanor…and they are still there…crooks that they are….that’s what gets me so riled up….then they point fingers at the repubs….kool aid is much to strong I think. By Libra Lady on 02/05/2009 12:48 am Those banks crooks are stil there they are the ones that got us into this mess. all these complicated derivitives and worthless paper credit vehicles. Greed is what did it capitalism unregulate. . Now its global.
By starry Nite on 02/05/2009 12:06 am
eleanor roche
Starry—I realize this argument is what you have been “spoon-fed”, but if you really care to know how we got into “this mess” research it for yourself. Congress implemented policies on lending institutions and banks and forced them to change traditional lending practices to allow lower income people into the housing market—thus “creative financing” was born. This led to the infusion of bad assets in the form of mortgage-backed securities in the system. If there had been better oversight in Congress—deliberately blocked by Dodd, Frank, Waters etc.—and this problem caught a few years back, we may not be in this situation today.
By eleanor roche on 02/05/2009 9:04 am
Libra Lady
eleanor…Oh so true!!! Waters was a peach during the hearings at that time…I’ve seen that clip more than I want to mention of her saying how secure they were….give me a break…thanks for reminding me of Waters….that made me laugh….just like everytime Barney speaks…and Dodd…omg…that’s an all different story there….we sure can be proud of our House can’t we???
By Libra Lady on 02/05/2009 9:29 am
starry Nite
Starry—I realize this argument is what you have been “spoon-fedBy eleanor roche on 02/05/2009 10:04 am This is like the pot calling the kettle black. However the point you make has been disproven as the cause. It is a scapegoat tactic. I think to blame the poor is dispicable. Sheer greed was the cause and lack of oversight by the government.
By starry Nite on 02/05/2009 12:38 pm
eleanor roche
Explain how it was “disproven”. And I thought you said lack of regulation.
By eleanor roche on 02/05/2009 1:36 pm
starry Nite
Explain how it was “disproven”. And I thought you said lack of regulation. By eleanor roche on 02/05/2009 2:36 pm I am sure you read all the back ground info that I have. You believe your party line and I believe mine. You call me spoon fed and I call you brainwashed. The truth lies somewhere in between. There is no argument or meeting of the minds. You are a very conservative republican and I am a democrat liberal . That is that. Based on your other posts we dont agree on anything including the current economic situation. I will refrain from using the word crisis.
By starry Nite on 02/05/2009 7:32 pm
eleanor roche
Libra Lady—I just read some of the details and apparently, it is not retroactive—it does not apply to those companies that have already taken bailout money under TARP, only those who will in the future and then, only the ones that need “exceptional” assistance. I think it was more like showboating by Obama now that I see the details—these guys aren’t really ultimately going to affected that much—it was more of a political jesture to make the American people feel good about these bailouts. So any company taking bailout money in the future, knows what they are getting into. I still think it sets a bad precedent—government has no business controlling these things.
By eleanor roche on 02/05/2009 11:37 am
Rush L
Just don’t touch the pay for talk radio hosts. I can’t get by on a dime less than $36 million a year.
By Rush L on 02/04/2009 7:51 pm
Steve Douglass
Yeah, that’s just brilliant. Way to go Messiah. I’m sure that teams in the NFL would get the best and most talented quarterbacks by capping the incomes of some teams and not other teams. Let’s see…these execs will go to other companies where they can get the money they seek, while these companies that Nobama is shackling will get the dregs of the MBA programs. Sounds like socialism to me. There’s no incentive.
By Steve Douglass on 02/04/2009 11:12 pm
Libra Lady
Steve…Big Govt. is taking over…it’s not that far away….
By Libra Lady on 02/04/2009 11:50 pm
f p
ssst! big government already has taken over—just look at how Bush increased the size of it—Homeland security, no child left behind, and his “faith’-based initiatives. Look to your own party first, plus the 6 trillion dollar debt and economic mess his left us in.
By f p on 02/05/2009 6:14 am
Libra Lady
Current Administration Topic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By Libra Lady on 02/05/2009 7:18 am
eleanor roche
Frank, Lincoln did more to restrict freedoms than Bush could have ever hoped to accomplish.
By eleanor roche on 02/05/2009 9:04 am
starry Nite
We are not playing football. The banks were a failure let them go and get a job somewhere else. The government is only going to salary those banks asking for a handout. They can’t seem to control their spending.
By starry Nite on 02/05/2009 12:08 am