Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Money | 10/03/2008 4:15 pm

Behind the Scenes at 10th Anniversary Fortune Most Powerful Women Summit in California

This week, 334 extraordinary women met in San Diego for the 10th Anniversary Fortune Most Powerful Women Summit (October 1 - 3).

The setting was beautiful (the venue was The Four Seasons in North San Diego), the temperature was warm (high 70s). And the sky Wednesday night — opening night — sported a crescent moon and no rain, humidity or tension. Limousines greeted us at the airport (why not, the entrance fee is steep but we all paid months ago when "bailouts" were something you did from rowboats). The fate and fallout of a crashing economy was THE topic (the news of the Senate’s and House’s passing of Secretary Paulson’s proposal had yet to surface), and the women were comparing notes on meltdowns, layoffs and rumors, while networking with a vengeance to make up for decades of networking dearth.

Who was there? Meg Whitman, ex-eBay CEO; Lisa Caputo, chief marketing officer of Citigroup; Esther Dyson, chairman of EDventure Holdings; Mary Meeker, managing director of Morgan Stanley; Mellody Hobson, president of Ariel Capital; Sherrie Rollins Westin, chief marketing director of Sesame Workshop; Indra Nooyi, CEO of PepsiCo; Kay Koplovitz, founder of USA Network and CEO, Koplovitz & Co.; Ursula Burns, president of Xerox; Susan Decker, president of Yahoo!; Donna E. Shalala, president and professor of political science, University of Miami; Susan Arnold, president of Procter & Gamble Co. The super achievers all seemed to be donning Armani suits with an occasional flair of a Gucci/Ferragamo accent scarf. The haircuts were impeccable. The heels, chunky yet still super-high. The electronics — glowing all the time while tucked inside gift bags (yet another favor from a Fortune sponsor).

The women were comparing notes on meltdowns, layoffs and rumors ...

Only three males were in evidence:

1. Andy Serwer, our first host, who is managing editor of Fortune and seen often as business anchor on cable television (CNN’s "American Morning," etc.).

2. Lloyd C. Blankfein, our first guest and chairman and CEO of  Goldman Sachs (recipient of some $5 billion from Guest No. 2), celebrated the winner of a global initiative that Goldman Sachs launched — "10,000 Women," a  philanthropic endeavor providing 10,000 women, mostly from developing markets, with a business and management education. Many of the participants were present (glowing young women from Russia, Peru, Argentina … entrepreneurial embryos privileged to work alongside these top business women in America for three weeks). Mr. Blankfein beamed out at the audience: "I’m thrilled to be out of New York!" We all knew why.

3. Warren Buffett, the supreme guest, was also introduced, and the rumor spread all evening that he was looking for a bridge game. At the time of this writing, Ann Moore (CEO of Time), Jane Olson (chair of Human Rights Watch) and Kristen Manos (executive vice president and president, North American Office Environments for Herman Miller, Inc.) had volunteered! Of course the other buzz about Mr. Buffett that evening was that he had bestowed $3 billion onto General Electric … ("What the hell were the stakes at bridge?" we wondered).

2008_1003_joni_warren_buffett.jpg
Carol Loomis interviewing Warren Buffett

54 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Step away from the BLOG!
Fantastic!! Thanks Joni!! Will read in even more depth in weeks to come as more articles and vids surface on Ted.com etc….but this was tantalizing start. Sounds fantastic. I love the Four Seasons, anywhere and everywhere. Always perfect.
By Step away from the BLOG! on 10/03/2008 4:51 pm
Brooklyn Gal
I am so glad Silda was there and had a sense of humor. Warren Buffet is a great American because he cares about the average American tax payer and his endorsement of Obama speaks volumes about McCain’s knowledge of the economy. It’s amazing that all these articulate, intelligent and powerful women were there on the same day as the Palin debate. Palin may be in a position to be the most powerful woman in the world if McCain wins the election and God forbid dies in office. I would have loved to have been a fly on that wall when they discussed that possibility.
By Brooklyn Gal on 10/04/2008 12:33 am
Marjorie C.
…super achievers all seemed to be donning Armani suits with an occasional flair of a Gucci/Ferragamo accent scarf. The haircuts were impeccable. The heels, chunky yet still super-high…. WOW, now that’s impressive. The elite. God bless them.
By Marjorie C. on 10/04/2008 8:32 am
HA BIBI
WOW, now that’s impressive. The elite. God bless them. LOL Marjorie!!!
By HA BIBI on 10/04/2008 12:19 pm
HA BIBI
Oh…..Forgot to inquire, Was their lipstick applied properly?
By HA BIBI on 10/04/2008 12:21 pm
Step away from the BLOG!
Many of ‘the elite’ impress me a lot because they didn’t start out that way. Steve Jobs slept on his friend’s dorm room floors, collected bottles so he could eat, and walked across town many miles once a week to have a meal at a church. Warren Buffett is the richest man on Earth but still lives in his humble home, Silda’s family had no money, Oprah ditto, etc. Oprah certainly wouldn’t have the same effect if she did her show in a stained bathrobe, smokin’ a ciggie, and drinking stale cold coffee out of a chipped cup.
By Step away from the BLOG! on 10/06/2008 12:36 pm
Buh- Bye
LOL Marjorie. I aspire more to this: http://www.esiee.fr/~bureaud/Jaime/aproulx.jpg And hope one day to have the courage to get there.
By Buh- Bye on 10/05/2008 4:53 pm
Buh- Bye
That’s Annie Proulx btw, Pulitzer Prize winner and author of the fabulous “The Shipping News.”
By Buh- Bye on 10/05/2008 4:59 pm
Susan B
Yes, can we manage to have a discussion about high-achieving women in corporate America without the fashion references? Please!
By Susan B on 10/05/2008 12:16 am
Brooklyn Gal
Exactly!! Wow has been taking such a sexist approach (fashion, cosmetic enhancements, etc.) to women from Cindy and Michelle to now these women who broke the glass ceiling. Marjorie and friends referred to them as elitist because of how they dress? What a put down of their achievements and good works!! If they are going to use that argument against these women, then they would have to start with Cindy who spends a fortune on her clothes. Palin has been wearing designer dresses and glasses too. So much for identifying with the middle class on that front. I think it would be better for Wow to rethink the messages they are sending about us as women—that we care more for fashion than substance.
By Brooklyn Gal on 10/05/2008 12:29 pm
Susan B
Yes, “elitist” seems to be in the eye of the beholder. And what an empty indictment! If a person possesses money, education and professional success, they are automatically elitist. Unless they’re Republicans, of course. Is Carly Fiorina an elitist? Or T. Boone Pickens? Or Cindy McCain? Michelle O. attended Harvard, Cindy McC. attended USC. Both have excellent educations, and both have done good works. Michelle had to earn her Ivy League education, Cindy’s private university education was handed her. So, who is the real elitist? And what does it really matter? I wish we could put down the epithets and try to look at the individual and his or her contributions before we write an entire group of people off so viciously or dismissively.
By Susan B on 10/05/2008 2:46 pm
Buh- Bye
I guess WOW does need to make some $ tho. An influx of fashion sponsors would us allow us more blog ranting time. ;)
By Buh- Bye on 10/05/2008 9:59 pm
Brooklyn Gal
Thanks for the wink, but if this is the route they have to take, it doesn’t speak well of the readers of this blog. It’s always been about the bottom line especially when they knew those Hillary posts and the comment attacks on Hillary would bring in the bacon. Yet we were warned to be nice about Palin. There are other ways of generating $$$$, and I am sure those powerful women would not have appreciated those remarks if they were written for a men’s site.
By Brooklyn Gal on 10/05/2008 10:07 pm
Joni Evans
Sexist? Elitist? As the author of this particular entry, I’m baffled. I hoped to convey my appreciation, awe and excitement about the assemblage of such accomplished women. And yes, they were stylish. I mentioned that (in one sentence) because I am also appreciative that they were so stylish as well. What went wrong??? Why is that not a good thing? Would love to know. JONI
By Joni Evans on 10/05/2008 10:33 pm
Brooklyn Gal
Joni, It was Marjorie (and friend) that made the elitist comment which I found offensive (read my original comment) because I loved this piece. Then the conversation turned to other things Wow has published regarding fashion and cosmetics. “My Alias” seems to think this is some sort of embedded advertising. And, if the one sentence about fashion was not included, maybe Marjorie would have seen the relevance of this topic. I suppose if these women were attending the opening of a play or charity benefit it would make sense to describe the fashion. I was just wondering if this was a symposium of powerful men, would Fortune magazine mention their designer suits? I really don’t know. But I appreciate the fact that you are interested in my opinion.
By Brooklyn Gal on 10/06/2008 12:12 am