Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 12/26/2008 7:30 am

Benazir Bhutto and Pakistan: One Year Later, by Vishakha N. Desai

By Vishakha N. Desai
Courtesy of Vishakha N. Desai

Editor’s Note: It’s been one year since an assassin shot and killed Benazir Bhutto, Pakistan’s first female prime minister. To commemorate Bhutto’s death, Vishakha N. Desai, a regular contributor to wowOwow and president of the Asia Society, remembers Bhutto and ponders Pakistan’s political future.

Although Benazir Bhutto had been a frequent guest of the Asia Society in the late 1980s, when she first came to power, my first face-to-face meeting with her didn’t take place until July 2007.

It was clear by then that she was preparing to go back to Pakistan with the support of the U.S. government. Having heard so much about her beauty and elegant demeanor, I wasn’t disappointed. Her face, as always, was perfectly made up. If you just saw her photo, you would think that she had not changed much from the 1980s. What was different was her resolve to go back to Pakistan and her clarity about what she needed to do. She knew that she had to tackle two serious challenges: First, she needed to restore democratically elected government by dealing directly with the military dictatorship of President Pervez Musharraf. And, second, it was imperative that Bhutto tackle the issue of increasing power of Islamic fundamentalist groups.

Though a daunting task, Bhutto knew how to handle the first problem: Work with U.S. officials to force Musharraf’s hand to let her return and call for new elections. She would then be free to, hopefully, mobilize her party – and indeed the Pakistani people – and clinch the elections. The second problem proved to be more of a challenge and Bhutto clearly wasn’t sure how to handle the fundamentalist elements in Pakistan.

When asked, she gave a standard answer about the power of democratic process and the potential of education to eradicate radicalism of disenchanted youth. It was evident that her historically problematic relationship with the army, going back to the hanging of her father, former Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, would make the possibility of her gaining any control over the military very difficult.

When she went back to Pakistan in October, 2007, she was confident that through her charisma she would win the political battle, but she was unsure as to how or whether she would be successful against the radical faction of the society. This radical faction was one initially supported by her government, her military and the American allies against the Russians in Afghanistan. Bhutto was particularly worried about key figures in the army and their unwillingness to provide suitable protection for her. And, as we all know by now, on December 27 Bhutto lost her life to the second problem. Politics she could handle, but terrorist forces proved to be more potent than ever.

A year later, Pakistan seems less governable and more on the brink of becoming a failed state. Asif Ali Zardari, Bhutto’s husband and a man once nationally famous for corruption scandals, has become the president of the country. And things aren’t looking very promising.

83 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

HA BIBI
Gosh, I can’t believe this terrible incident happened a year ago. It seems as if it happened juta month or so ago. This was such a brave woman who stood up against all the atrosities that have ravaged this country for years.
By HA BIBI on 12/26/2008 8:29 am
Grande Camper
I confused if she has gone back to Pakistan? If she has I wish her luck for Pakistan need the help right now.
By Grande Camper on 12/26/2008 11:16 am
HA BIBI
Hi Debra, Are you asking if Benazir Bhutto is the one going to go back to Pakistan. The reason I ask is if so, she can’t go back as she was the target of terrorism and was assinated earlier this year. :)
By HA BIBI on 12/26/2008 11:40 am
HA BIBI
That would be assassinated, not what I unintentionally wrote!
By HA BIBI on 12/26/2008 1:50 pm
Jim Henley
This post has been deleted as it violated the Ten Commandments of Posting on our website.
By Jim Henley on 12/26/2008 3:35 pm
HA BIBI
Totally agreed Jim, they will blame him for everything. If they didn’t have him to blame they’d have nothing to talk about. How was your Christmas? I hope it was great! :)
By HA BIBI on 12/26/2008 4:06 pm
Jim Henley
This post has been deleted as it violated the Ten Commandments of Posting on our website.
By Jim Henley on 12/26/2008 11:47 pm
HA BIBI
The weasels days are comming up, he will be scrutinized every which way till sunday, And like you said, he will have so much fun being President, LOL! Glad you had a nice Christmas.
By HA BIBI on 12/27/2008 10:40 am
sibelle daubigne
Obama fanatics know absolutely nothing about politics, world, or national events. What else is new? Have they ever heard of “Geopolitics”? lol Jim, i don’t understand why you bother with politics, just pass the cookies tray around, they will love it better! LOL
By sibelle daubigne on 12/26/2008 7:21 pm
Jim Henley
This post has been deleted as it violated the Ten Commandments of Posting on our website.
By Jim Henley on 12/26/2008 11:59 pm
sibelle daubigne
Jim, what is the question, it’s late but i’ll be glad to answer, as you seem to be intelligent enough to understand.
By sibelle daubigne on 12/27/2008 12:13 am
Char Star
Henley & friends are, again, full of it. To wit, “..the democratic push to give loans to homeless people”. There was no such thing. It was the Bush Adm that wanted this sub prime crisis. Bush’s policy to drive the value of the dollar down is leading now to total collapse of our dollar soon so that every $100 you have will be worth $20 or something like that—it’ll be from hyperinflation. The dollar has only taken a temporary rise in value from it’s fall because of the 2 trillion dollars worth of funny money the Fed has had printed up over at the Treasury. Bhutto had decided to bolster the dictator Musharraf by participating in his phony & rigged election by running in it. The other political parties in Pakistan do not like Musharraf because he is not for democracy but is a dictator. The People in Pakistan want a real democracy. The other political parties were going to ignore his phony election & therefore make it not an official election, but void.. Bhutto was originally going to boycott it too, but then she decided to throw herself in it—evidently with the understanding that she could rule politically with Musharaff as military leader, since the US was backing them both now—-plus Musharaff could later stop investigations into scandals involving money that were upcoming for Bhutto. (Pres Clinton’s Adm did not back Musharaff—when he came to America, Clinton would not publicly shake his hand because he’s a dictator—Bush began to back Musharaff right after 9/11. Also of importance, right after Bhutto’s assassination, the Pentagon quietly announced they were selling $500 million dollars worth of Lockheed Martin nuclear capable F-16s to Pakistan, to Musharaff) Scotland Yard investigated Bhutto’s death & found a bomb had gone off & she hit her head, it was not a bullet that killed her—with no evidence to go on because Musharaff cleaned the area of all clues immediately afterward, but Scotland Yard did not investigate who killed her just what killed her. The overwhelming majority of the people of Pakistan feel dismayed & disappointed at Bush policy to support one man, Musharaff, against the whole nation, who do not want him. It’s given rise to anti-American feelings. Perhaps one of those political groups killed her because by joining in his election—it gave him authority & made the election valid, if you will. If she had stayedj out of it—it would have shown him to be rejected by his people & would render his “election”, with no one but him in it—not valid. .
By Char Star on 12/26/2008 11:07 pm
Jim Henley
This post has been deleted as it violated the Ten Commandments of Posting on our website.
By Jim Henley on 12/27/2008 12:34 am
Char Star
Henley, I didn’t say “suicide bomber”—I said a bomb, quoting Scotland Yard. But you knew that. You just wanted an excuse to run with the suicide bomber thing, didn’t you, phony? Yeah it matters if it was a bullet or a bomb. You are so full of it boy. ACORN wanted more people to get home loans, it’s true. But I don’t know any investors that will let a mortgage company lend their money to a guy that can’t pay—investors are funny that way. There are laws that prevent a mortgage company from giving a loan to someone that can’t pay. Those would be the laws that were put in place after the ‘29 crash—to prevent just this sub prime crisis from happening—the one that just happened—the laws that the Bush Adm looked the other way on while companies broke the law that all the other presidents since ‘29 have made sure these companies adhered to. I can go into the crooked guys McCain had advising him too, including Phil Gramm (R). Paulson is crooked, etc as is all the Bush cabal We have a masively crooked govt. What do you know re Bhutto? Hucksters like you Jim Henley are un-patriotic & doing a disservice to your fellow men. You are not helping democracy by spreading misinformation to help some group or other fool people so they don’t know what’s really going on. That is a shameful occupation. That is you Jim. Is your family proud of what daddy does?
By Char Star on 12/27/2008 1:49 am
Jim Henley
This post has been deleted as it violated the Ten Commandments of Posting on our website.
By Jim Henley on 12/28/2008 1:47 am