Politics | 01/12/2009 2:45 pm

Bids Reach $3.7M for 22-Year-Old 'Natalie Dylan's' Virginity

By The Staff at wowOwow.com

"Natalie Dylan"

This 22-year-old brunette — who is auctioning off her virginity to pay for graduate school — is reportedly getting bids high enough to pay not just for school … but two homes in the country, a BMW and nearly everything on Mary Wells’s luxe list.

That’s right, the daughter of the conservative fourth-grade teacher (who goes by the pseudonym "Natalie Dylan") is claiming that the bidding has hit $3.7 million!

Can you believe it!? In this economy? Maybe we’re all in the wrong business. We kid, of course …

Read more about: Beauty, Dating, Economy, Natalie Dylan, News, Prostitution, Sex

63 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Don’t understand what all the fuss is about. If she’s that hot and still a virgin… why not!! I think some of you are secretly jealous lol

By Kevin Donnelly on 01/13/2009 1:17 pm

e-mail alert

Kevin, She’s a beautiful girl and she has so much worth and this ultimately rob’s her of that worth. That is not jealousy at all, that’s hating to see another woman being sold as a piece of meat…….And a woman thinking that the more she’s sold for, the more worthy she is, Misguided.

By HA BIBI on 01/13/2009 4:09 pm

e-mail alert

Interesting. So she’s worthy until she has sex for money, and then she’s worthless? That appears to be what you’re saying. To me a person’s worth is internal, and it has nothing to do with whom he or she has sex with and why. Not only are you saying that you will consider her worthless if she goes through with the deal, but you are essentially saying that women who seek employment have no worth. Anyone who is employed is paid money to perform services. People who have the advantage of say, being good at math, might sell their services to people by doing their accounting or designing their cars. People who have the advantage of being beautiful might sell their services to people by acting in movies or having sex with them.

By R.J.B. Reed on 01/13/2009 6:07 pm

e-mail alert

Oh no, not at all what I’m saying. What I said was she is valuable as a person and should never subjucate herself to such demeaning behavior and practices, and the fact that she is doing this, exhibits a mind set that thinks the higher the amout she brings in, is where her worth and value rest and that’s false and an unhealthy way of thinking. She should realize her worth as a precious human being, one that can not be bought or sold. Pleeeze, how can you compare a legitimate career in film or anything other nobel career to selling yourself as a prostitute.

By HA BIBI on 01/13/2009 7:49 pm

e-mail alert

First of all, she’s not selling herself. This what we call an euphemism. She’s merely selling a service to someone and will still own herself at the end. Secondly, you seem to feel that making a decision on employment because it brings in more money than other decisions is an unhealthy way of thinking, which I find quite odd. Certainly income isn’t the only aspect of a job that one should consider, but it IS an aspect. For instance, my father left one accounting job for another because the new one offered him $20k more. Was this unhealthy? Do you think that he felt his worth and value was strictly based on this income? I don’t think so. Why is prostitution different than any other job? In Nevada it is a perfectly legitimate way to earn an income. Explain exactly what makes prostitution, often called the oldest profession, different than waitressing.

By R.J.B. Reed on 01/13/2009 8:13 pm

e-mail alert

Sorry R.J.B. her services as you call them, are not are not geared toward giving anything outside of herself….Say, offering her services as a consultant, Lawyer, Hairdresser ect…I never said an income of high dollar value was unhealthy in anyway, nothing wrong with making loads of money, and really has nothing to do with people leaving one job for another because it pays more. Which brings us to the point of whether or not one agrees that this is a moral way of making an income, regardless of the amount. My personal belief is, that this is not something that is done by people who are self respecting nor have values and morals. And I again, suppose that has to do with ones beliefs and where they place their values and such. Prostitution is something, that in the end of the day, the only good thing someone may take away from it is, perhaps the money and that is also up to for speculation. What one person considers good money another may not think so. No good thing comes out of prostitution, women are degraded whether they are aware of that or not, it doesn’t change the fact that they are. Drugs often times become incorporated into it as many women in this profession claim to self medicate, numbing themselves, just to get through the grind of what it is they are really doing. There is the ever present risk of disease. There is also the risk of run in’s with the law and rap sheets that don’t make for good and reliable references when looking for “reputable” employment. Not to mention that many women are also physically abused and killed as a result of being involved in this trade. far to many reasons to justify the worth of it. A waitress, is more than likely not running the risk of any of the aforementioned occurences happen to her. Keep in mind that Just because something may be legal…..It doesn’t necessarily mean it is right.

By HA BIBI on 01/13/2009 9:52 pm

e-mail alert

You still haven’t adequately defined the difference between prostitution as a profession and something else. I’ve made money tutoring people in physics and math. These are not things outside of myself. I didn’t build anything. The person I’ve tutored is left with nothing outside of the experience, just as a person who goes to a prostitute will have nothing after htat. I would agree that prostitutes are probably not people who have your moral values. However, having different morals does not mean one lacks morals. Certainly many prostitutes, especially those where prostitution is illegal, lack self-respect. Others do not. Simply because YOU view it as wrong and couldn’t do it without losing respect for yourself doesn’t mean that is true for someone else. There are many office workers trapped in cube space who have lost respect for themselves due to the soul destroying work that they do. Does that make this employment wrong? You know, saying “women are degraded whether they know it or not” reminds me of a line from shock treatment. “Some people only *think* they’re happy.” If you don’t feel you are degraded, then you aren’t. It’s really is in one’s head. Prostitution is fairly risky now because it is illegal in 49 states. Were it legal, it would be a lot less risky. Strip dancers, who have a very similar employment, are certainly much less at risk due to the legality of their profession. In any case, some jobs have risks. Being a coal miner or a cop in Oakland, CA is risky. Are those jobs bad because they are more dangerous than being a physics professor, for instance? Whether something is right or not is really a matter of opinion. There is no absolute rule regarding what is right and what is not, so a discussion of this sort is pointless. However, given this the laws should be as open as possible so that everyone can live their life based on the morals and values they have.

By R.J.B. Reed on 01/13/2009 10:45 pm

e-mail alert

Well R.J.B. Here’s the difference between a waitress and a prostitute…..One does her work on her feet, while the other does it on her back. And as I stated earlier it does come down to what is right and wrong and which side of the fence your on. There is a difference between noble and honorable work and work if you will that is not noble nor has any redemptive value and although prostitution is not noble neither was Bernie Madoff, people just got screwed in a different way. I understand you saying that people only think they are happy, but that if you really got an honest answer out of the individual, people for the most part are really truly able to decipher the difference and again, if honest, will tell you if they really are happy or not. Even if they deny it outwardly, they still know what they feel. When you state that people have different morals, That leaves one open for speculation as to what is what is not moral.To say that moral grounds are an open field, leaves people without any direction. An anything goes type of mentality, if you will and there must be boundries that are set otherwise you have anarchy and complete chaos. Some may feel Murder to be morally correct because they were perhaps slighted in some way. This takes me to the one that proves that actions that are harmful to the individual as well as to society as a whole, is God. God sets the blueprint for how we are to live in these flesh bodies and how those things that we do can have a profound effect on us and those around us, universaly. The question is whether one bleieves in God and that the Bible (blueprint) is real. There are those of us who do and those who don’t, we all decide which side of the fence we will stand.

By HA BIBI on 01/14/2009 10:56 am

e-mail alert

The difference between prositution and waitressing is merely one of position? I earn my money sitting on my butt, does that mean I’m halfway between a waitress and a prostitute? Interesting….. One should always be open to speculatoin on what is and isn’t moral. To remain static is to be dead between your ears. In this society, we’ve placed some boundries with the idea that we should maximize individual liberty. Essentially this means that your rights end where my nose begins. While we have many other arbitrary and archane laws that involve social nicety, they are slowly being pushed to the wayside as we realize people should have the right to live the life that they want. As for whether a person believes in God or the Bible, well that still doesn’t give definitive morals. After all, it depends on which god you believe in! Even among people who claim to be Christian, there is a lot of disagreement about the morality contained within the Bible. As far as I can tell, there is no sect of Christianity that doesn’t pick and choose in some fashion. In fact, if morality were absolute, there wouldn’t have been any schisms within the church. Certainly every person needs to decide what he or she believes, but I think it is important to acknowledge that none of us have the answers….

By R.J.B. Reed on 01/14/2009 11:28 am

e-mail alert

R.J.B.—Another way to look at it is in some countries fathers ‘sell’ their daughters for dowries all the time as a matter of cultural norms. I think what this woman is odd, wouldn’t have been something I did….but that’s her business. And that woman is a one trick pony with her ‘Christian-inanity”

By %$#@* !@&*^!! on 01/14/2009 12:54 pm

e-mail alert

The difference between prositution and waitressing is merely one of position? I earn my money sitting on my butt, does that mean I’m halfway between a waitress and a prostitute? Interesting….. By R.J.B. Reed on 01/14/2009 12:28 pm R.J.B. LOL, when I read that, I got a chuckle and no I didn’t mean that at all. You had asked me what the difference was between a waitress and a prostitute I wasn’t anticipating anyone in between the horizontal and vertical positions as a barometer, LOL. When you state that one should always be open to speculation on what is and isn’t moral….That is a compass one sets for themselves and isn’t dictated by the masses as there will always be those that are on one side or the other of an issue. I don’t for a moment believe that one becomes static between the ears because they set a standard for their lives and live by that standard. We also feel we are to vote with our voices with regards to what we believe is the right thing to do. I add this as I’m certain this will be the next question you pose. God does set the standards for what is moral and immoral, it’s just a matter as to whether you believe that or not and as for me, I believe that and leave that choice for you to decide. I to, do not get into the isims regarding religions or churches as I find my answers in the Bible and therefore avoid the legalISM’s of man….True, man does not have the answers, God does.

By HA BIBI on 01/14/2009 5:25 pm

e-mail alert

This is timely for me…just this past weekend I attended a wedding, a dear friend, divorced, then single for many years…finally found what we who loved her thought was her “soul mate”. The wedding was beautiful, we were so happy for her…then, in a quiet moment during the reception when I was telling her how happy I was for her, she said “Shhhh…he’s a great guy, but I married for security…I’m tired. I just want to be taken care of now, and he’ll do that for me.” I felt like someone had thrown cold water in my face. She is educated, had a great career…but made it clear that she had married just to be “taken care of”. I wonder if her new husband has any idea? Different strokes for different folks…

By J B on 01/14/2009 2:52 am

e-mail alert

JB, Your friend will be more likely to get another divorce. If the guy knew, believe me he would say “see ya!” For me I think of the “taken care of” as the same thing as when Steinem was embarassed to tell her friends that she was going to get married. Those situations never work out. If you make your own money and he makes his own money it is soooooo much better. Just my opinion.

By T P on 01/14/2009 9:30 am

e-mail alert

Tanja, I totally agree. Since when did it become a man’s job to take care of a woman. If it’s not based on what is authentic, it surely won’t last. And let the poor stiff lose his income somehow….. and the lady will be outta there. So sad IMO. :)

By HA BIBI on 01/14/2009 5:30 pm