Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 01/27/2009 8:40 am

Bloomberg: 'Cheap, Dirty Politics' Behind Kennedy Smears

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

The saga over who will replace Hillary Clinton in the Senate may be over, but the drama continues!

New York Gov. David Paterson’s desperately trying to move on from the whole ordeal — he even canceled a trip to Switzerland — but Mike Bloomberg’s not going to let the governor get away that easy. New York City Mayor Bloomberg this week called the treatment of Caroline Kennedy during her Senate bid "reprehensible," and wants to know who’s behind the leaking of news that perhaps she was bowing out of the race because of tax and nanny problems.

"I thought that the stuff that I saw in the papers was totally inappropriate," said Bloomberg. "It’s as good an example of cheap dirty politics as you could ever find, and I thought it was reprehensible." The Daily News reported Monday that Paterson signed off on the attack strategy pushed by a paid consultant.

Paterson says he doesn’t know who was behind the bashing. On Monday, he at first denied he or his staff was behind them, but then said they were coming from his office — but he doesn’t know from whom. "As you know, this is a pretty serious thing, and actually one that I would condemn," he said. But the New York Post is actually calling him a "liar," saying there’s no way the suspected leaker would have gone to the press with the damaging information without the governor’s approval.

Kennedy was "mired in some potentially embarrassing personal issues," the source told reporters Friday, says the Post. "She has a tax problem that came up in the vetting and a potential nanny issue. And reporters are starting to look at her marriage more closely … The governor had no intention of picking her because of the botched rollout executed in recent weeks. The Post has also reported that Kennedy bowed out for none of the reasons reported — but rather for a specific, family issue — and Paterson knew it. 

"Caroline can’t believe what Paterson did to her. She was smeared, and she’s never going to forgive it or forget it," a source told the Post.

The way Paterson handled the whole thing may hurt him in the long term, too. "There’s an awful lot of buzz in this place about the trouble the governor is in," one Democratic lawmaker told The Buffalo News. A Siena College poll released Monday shows that, although most New Yorkers like Paterson, more voters now say they prefer "someone else" as governor in 2010. That "someone" could very well be Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, who many voters would love to see in his dad’s former office. 

18 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

f p
WEll duh! of course—politics is like that, esp locally. Come see small town pols at play some time—or better yet look at Norm Coleman, Mr. Sleaze form Minnesota—now there’s your typical local pol at play with the rich and famous in Chanhassen and Eden Prarie, MN. No wonder he in an ethics investigation.
By f p on 01/27/2009 8:47 am
A Villager
Understood, “f p,” but here in New York, where our local politics are pretty childish and sleazy to begin with, Paterson shocked people. Attacking her AFTER she withdrew? Even Kennedy’s rivals and critics - and I’m talking about pols who were driving and stoking the media mockery of her qualifications, her “entitlement,” and her disastrous interview performance - were appalled. It was like sacking the wounded football player when they’ve already left the field and are limping up the ramp to the locker room. And the player was from Paterson’s own team - a fellow Democrat and a loyal one. It just is not done no matter what a person’s surname is. Paterson behaved just like an insecure boyfriend who was dumped. Rather than act like a grown-up about it, he lashed out at Kennedy in a totally sleazy and self-destructive way, betraying confidences and embellishing them with clumsy lies. He was so focused on trying to hurt the girl who brushed him off that he lost sight of how petty and repulsive it made him look to their acquaintances. As a New Yorker, I don’t need a Governor who is still stuck in adolescence. I’ve been a supporter before, but next year, I find a grown-up to vote for.
By A Villager on 01/27/2009 9:36 am
Brooklyn Gal
A villager, ” Pretty childish and sleazy” much like the type of thing you did with Maloney, a fine representative that you tried to label Blue Dog. At least Maloney walked away a winner. I wish those of you who persuaded Caroline to do this did a better job preparing her for all the media inquiries and speaking engagements. She is someone I truly respect and I know is smart and politically savvy, but did not come across that way. And, Paterson played her with his circus performance of a selection process. Who asks for a questionairre late in the process? That should have been done in the beginning of the vetting process. Paterson is not going after the person that leaked this false information because he knows it will get back to him. And I do believe he was involved. Knowing that you are a hack for either Bloomberg or Klein, and I understand Caroline’s BFF is Mrs. Joel Klein (the wife of the worst schools chancellor on the face of the planet) I really hope the mayor and Klein put their money where their mouth is and get Paterson out. But, not Rudy in. btw, David Letterman “went off” on Paterson last night.
By Brooklyn Gal on 01/27/2009 10:15 am
f p
STuck in adolescence lolololol too true.
By f p on 01/28/2009 10:28 am
Belinda Joy
It’s as good an example of cheap dirty politics as you could ever find, and I thought it was reprehensible.” I couldn’t agree with you more Mayor Bloomberg….dead on!
By Belinda Joy on 01/27/2009 8:54 am
S.J. Morgan
Imagine dirty politics…from perfect LEFT no less!
By S.J. Morgan on 01/27/2009 9:00 am
starry Nite
Imagine dirty politics…from perfect LEFT no less! By S.J. Morgan on 01/27/2009 10:00 am Clean politiics seems to be an oxymoron. Republicans are better at brainwashing. Republicans stand by their own right or wrong. Democrats not so much. Caroline Kennedy received just as much flak from democrats as Republicans.
By starry Nite on 01/28/2009 12:37 am
DeBúrca obj
Like I said in the other thread, these Paterson leaks and nasty rumors will do him more damage than it will Caroline Kennedy. It’s already starting.
By DeBúrca obj on 01/27/2009 9:03 am
Ms. Dee
I’m so sick and tired of “unidentified sources.” That’s what’s reprehensible if you ask me. Surely there’s some sort of journalistic association that could put a stop to this nonsense. If a spokesperson is too cowardly to identify themselves, for whatever reason, their statements have to remain “off the record”. The journalist can use this sort of gossip as a “tip”, but is gonna have to ferrett out confirmation in some other way, from an identifiable sourse. Otherwise, news becomes rumor, and rumor becomes fact and the whole nation goes back in Jr. High. It’s gotta stop.
By Ms. Dee on 01/27/2009 10:08 am
Arthur Frederick Ide
I agree with Ms. Dee—I have a real problem with anything in print that is either unsigned or signed with a single name or moniker. If the person writing is not proud of what he/she is stating in print, then that person should not write at all. Freedom of the press means being responsible for what is said—thus libel and slander are against the law (all laws in the western world). I did not like Caroline Kennedy’s bid because of her lack of experience, and because she did not vote regularly (a privilege for all citizens who love their nation, state, city or borough), but I would not have denied her the Senate seat. Paterson made a bad choice, but the worse part was that he did not squelch the rumors—and it is up to Paterson to identify those who created the stories and fire them. Only then can the governor show New York he is for truth, justice, and the New York way of fair play. No one is above the law. Those who lied or spread rumors without identifying themselves have no right to employment. My name is Arthur Frederick Ide, and I am responsible for this message.
By Arthur Frederick Ide on 01/27/2009 10:58 am
Cheryl Mitchell
Good for you Arthur :)
By Cheryl Mitchell on 01/27/2009 1:44 pm
roberta wickham
Why don’t the people who were leaked to tell us who the leakers were? Saying that Caroline was disqualified because of “tax and nanny issues” sounds like a sarcastic remark Paterson might have made, in the same vein as his wisecrack about appointing Michelle Obama to the post. You all do remember, don’t you, the series of Attorney General appointees that Bill Clinton famously had to discard because of those issues. A paper like the Post — where much of the staff treat Americans like a toy country — would be only too happy to misuse an off-the-cuff statement that was intended as a joke to make trouble for the Governor, and Mayor Bloomberg would be only too happy to profit from it.
By roberta wickham on 01/27/2009 12:21 pm
Lee Harrison
I think the bigger question is what was the motivation? Who put the unidentified source up to it?
By Lee Harrison on 01/27/2009 12:32 pm
elaine s
Shame on Paterson - he has no class. Caroline Kennedy will come out on top. Her treatment was inexcusable. David Letterman made this point last night and he is so right.
By elaine s on 01/27/2009 4:41 pm
Buh- Bye
They’re in an uproar over Kennedy after what they did to Hillary? puh-leeze! Democratic beltway insiders participated in a “Sophie’s Choice” decision this election year and utilized the media for the task.
By Buh- Bye on 01/28/2009 10:24 am