Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 01/02/2009 8:30 am

'Campaign for Mike!' NASA Chief's Wife Launches Campaign to Convince Obama to Let Husband Keep Job

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Mike Griffin/Nasa.gov

How much would you do to help your husband keep his job? Would you petition the president?

That’s what Rebecca Griffin, the wife of NASA Administrator Michael Griffin, did.

Rebecca Griffin is e-mail blasting a "Campaign for Mike" message around, asking friends, family and everyone in between to sign an online petition asking President-elect Barack Obama to "consider keeping Mike Griffin on as NASA administrator."

"Dr. Michael Griffin is one of the most technically and managerially competent administrators in NASA’s history," the petition says. "He has brought a sense of order and purpose to the U.S. space agency, guiding decisions in all programs with the firm belief that our strength as a world power is determined in a large part by our preeminence in space, particularly in human spaceflight."

AP says Rebecca Griffin wrote in her e-mail: "Yes, once again I am embarrassing my husband by reaching out to our friends and ‘imposing’ on them … And if this is inappropriate, I’m sorry."

While AP says that the lobbying efforts on those close to Griffin — who has had the job since 2005 — are "unusually bold," there may be a reason for them, and reason to fear Obama may pick his own NASA administrator.

After he was elected, Obama set up various agency review teams for each government agency, whose job it is to interview employees about their respective programs, bosses and funding difficulties. ThinkProgress last month noted that Michael Griffin has put up roadblocks for the NASA review team, headed by former NASA associate administrator Lori Garver. He called her "not qualified" to judge his rocket programs and, after one "heated" conversation, asked to speak directly to the president-elect.

From ThinkProgress:

But even more disturbing is the Orlando Sentinel’s report that Griffin has been muzzling NASA employees from speaking openly to Obama’s review staffers, "scripting" them "on what they can tell the transition team"; he has also reportedly "warned" aerospace executives not to criticize his pet project — NASA’s "delayed but over-budget" moon rocket program.

In early December, the Sentinel detailed the tensions between Mike Griffin and Obama’s agency review team, and reported that Garver told a meeting of aerospace representatives in Washington that "there will be change" to NASA policy and hinted that Obama would name a new administrator soon. 

Mike Griffin’s spokesman said his boss isn’t campaigning to keep his job but would be "honored" to be asked to stay on. He couldn’t speak to what Griffin’s wife was doing.

"A lot of people seem to like and support Mike and think he’s doing a good job," spokesman David Mould told the AP.

9 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Belinda Joy
Oh no! If the information included in this article is indeed true, NO he should not keep his job. We need to learn from our mistakes over the last decade. Barack speaks constantly of transparency and honesty in his administration. Before he even takes office we are now faced with a man that is attempting to control those that work under him and questioning those who dare interview him and his NASA team. This is a HUGE red flag and should not go ignored. PE Obama gave Lori Garver a directive, and the fact that Miller is trying to circumvent that speaks volumes. Rebecca Griffin’s heart is in the right place but in this instance she should be honest with herself and him, and acknowledge his actions may not be in line with the incoming administration.
By Belinda Joy on 01/02/2009 9:53 am
DeBúrca obj
AP says Rebecca Griffin wrote in her e-mail: “Yes, once again I am embarrassing my husband by reaching out to our friends and ‘imposing’ on them … And if this is inappropriate, I’m sorry.”… I couldn’t have said it better myself. Yes Rebecca it is inappropriate and if you are NOT embarrassing your husband, there is something wrong with him.
By DeBúrca obj on 01/02/2009 10:56 am
f p
NO way should this Bush meathead appointee keep his job—his unwillingness to give out info etc is not indicative of a strong leader.
By f p on 01/02/2009 11:14 am
Ms. Dee
More than the well-made points above, since when is our “strength as a world power determined in large part by our pre-eminence in space, particluarly in human space flight.”? What’s that about?
By Ms. Dee on 01/02/2009 12:26 pm
Patty E
As we all know, framing an article with select words and a slight lean, can definitely influence the outcome of understanding and comment, by those who read it……that said, I am not surprised that the comments are against Mike Griffin, in keeping his job. I lived on Nasa I, south of Houston for a long while., I knew a ton of people that worked for Nasa, got to see some of the new technologies before the public did, was able to see the space shuttle up close, and the international space station as it was being built at various stages. I have sat on patios with astronuats, drinking beer, and one of my best friends was the scientist who was the first human to examine the moon rocks, after that infamous trip to the moon….. I believe I have a pretty good ‘feel’ for the situation. First of all—-These people that live and work for Nasa—Live to Work at Nasa. Many are eccentric scientists, some say full of ‘magical thinking’…they dream bigger dreams, and are not afraid to do do so….many of our ‘medical breakthroughs’ are actually discovered at Nasa, for instance…and ome of the stuff they have come up with is definitely ‘james bond-ian’—-futuristic. There are some who will say that those living around Nasa, are aliens from other planets, waiting for humans to figure out how to get them back home to their OWN planet….it is a different world within the community of Nasa, than what we all are accustomed to understanding. So when I first read that Griffens’ wife was doing this, I thought ‘oh! that’s normal’…thinking outside the box and re-defining, as well as debunking what some would say are ‘appropriate manners’…. I do not believe that the guy is trying to ‘hide’ something…I believe he wants to keep his job. I believe that he wants to finish something he is excited about, that has already been started. I believe that he may be so attached to it, that he is frustrated that there is possibility of being pushed aside, and he will not be able to finish what he has been involved in starting…..These people are scientists—not politicians—-and when a person is forced into a role-play which is totallly outside their comfort zone—-chaos seems to step in… that would be the same for you—-if you were threatened of your livlihood—and the solution seemed so far out of your grasp….you had no say yourself, yet everyone around you—even strangers, held your future in their hands .
By Patty E on 01/02/2009 1:45 pm
Lee Harrison
Thank you Patty E, As I read the above story I kept reminding myself there are at least two sides to every story. The press has taken on the job of judge and jury with their constant innuendo and half truths. I grew up in DC during the McCarthy era. My dad was in the military with top security clearance. My sister and I were forbidden to tell anyone where my dad worked or anything about him, for fear someone in our neighborhood was a McCarthy plant who would somehow twist something we said to cause Dad to lose his job or worse. The press has managed to create a bit of the same enviornment McCarthy did all those years ago…and for some reason, the public doesn’t question what they read or see on tv. What happened to critical thinking? D
By Lee Harrison on 01/02/2009 8:48 pm
starry Nite
NASA needs review for budget purposes . Scientists don’t make good business cases. They are dedicated to their work . If indeed the report is true and I have been hearing these reports for sometime- the head of the agency was being uncoorporative. NASA often takes a high handed approach with others. Not a good idea .
By starry Nite on 01/03/2009 12:06 am
Chrome Toe
I agree with Starry Nite that NASA needs review for budget purposes. i dont’ know enough about any of it to know whether or not the guy should keep his job. but I do believe everything we’re spending money on and all the people in charge need to be reviewed and held accountable. as far as the wife goes. I don’t find it out of the box at all. I find it more than a bit goofy that the woman thinks we should choose a NASA leader based on petition signatures? really??? well then maybe i should run for the job. i’m sure it pays fairly well. I hope the guy isn’t overly influenced by his wife as she appears to not have much common sense.
By Chrome Toe on 01/03/2009 8:33 am