01/02/2009 11:00 am

POV

Caroline Kennedy Gets Reluctant Nod From Big NY Democrat

© AP

In this series, which started in July ‘08, wowOwow follows the political news swirling around Caroline Kennedy since her surprise endorsement of Barack Obama and high-profile placement on his VP selection committee. Now, Caroline is ready to launch a political career of her own. With the Caroline Kennedy Candidacy Watch, we’ll follow all the latest news.

New York Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver appears to have had a change of heart toward Caroline Kennedy.

Silver, the second-most-powerful Democrat in New York politics after Gov. David Paterson, has — up until now — criticized Kennedy and her qualifications, or lack thereof, to fill Hillary Clinton’s Senate seat.

Well now, ole’ Shelly appears to have changed his mind.

He told The New York Post that because he thinks "there’s a good possibility" that Paterson will pick Kennedy for the job, he’s warming up to her. 

"If she is the appointee of the governor, I will certainly be supportive of her. I will work for her and will work strenuously for her election," Silver said.

That’s a complete about-face from what Silver was saying last week, blasting Kennedy for appearing to be more loyal to New York Republican Mayor Michael Bloomberg than to Paterson.

But Silver says he’s reading the writing on the wall, and believes Paterson wants to run for election in 2010 with a strong candidate (i.e., a Kennedy) on the ticket. “Having a well-known woman on the ticket will be helpful,” Silver said.

Ahhhh. So deciding who will fill Hillary’s shoes is going to be all political after all? How about picking the person who is the most qualified, whoever that may be? What a concept …

The Post also says Paterson has no intention of naming a caretaker to the seat – or someone who will just fill it until 2010. He wants someone in there who can win election in 2010 and continue the work. He also thinks it would damage New York’s standing in the Senate.

"I’m actually opposed to that," Paterson said. "It would cause New York to lose seniority, and in the United States Senate, the most effective senators are the ones that have seniority. So, I’m hoping that the person I select wins a primary."

As to reports that his decision is pretty much made, Paterson says not so fast. The governor doesn’t like being told what to do – and having so many people pushing Kennedy on him, and the media assuming it’s a done deal, likely hasn’t helped matters much.

AP says two people close to the governor say Kennedy will be his choice, but Paterson told The New York Times Thursday that the search is still ongoing.

From the Times:

Mr. Paterson offered a cautionary note for those who might try to influence his decision or divine where his preferences lie. "There’s one choice. It’s the one the governor will make. And in the end everybody will understand that," he said. Recalling a statement by Bill Klem, the legendary baseball umpire, the governor added, "It ain’t nothin’ till I calls it. And that’s how I’m telling you. Pass that along to any of these excited people who think they’re going to influence me."

64 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

BelindaJoy
The Governor is in a tough spot, caught between a rock and a hard place. If he does ultimately choose Caroline, it will be perceived as “See, we knew he would pick her.” Yet if he doesn’t choose her it will be perceived as “He only chose that person so he wouldn’t be perceived as giving preferential treatment to a Kennedy.” The problem with this is, on many levels Caroline Kennedy would make a good Senator. Would she be the best? That’s debatable. But all this speculation and hype pushing her as the only viable choice could backfire.
By BelindaJoy on 01/02/2009 10:17 am
DeBrcaobj
If I were a New Yorker I would want Caroline Kennedy because, not only do I think she would be very dedicated and capable as Senator, but through her support of and friendship with our new president she would have his ear… and that can only be good for New York.
By DeBrcaobj on 01/02/2009 11:41 am
BrooklynGal1
As a New Yorker, I pray you are correct. But if she also is also influenced by Bloomberg and Klein then I personally will have a problem with that. But for Silver, who is very influential, to now back her, gives me the impression deals were already made. I just don’t understand why Patterson can’t announce this appointment before the inauguration.
By BrooklynGal1 on 01/02/2009 12:49 pm
DianaT
It’s Caroline, official on Huffington…
By DianaT on 01/02/2009 2:29 pm
DeBrcaobj
Wow, it’s Caroline?! Sort of brave of Patterson I think. She’ll do great, I’m sure of it. I’m also envious… now NY will have 2 Senators, unlike Illinois because even if Burris gets to keep the appointment, he’ll be a joke. Well, at least he’ll be a vote, but he won’t get re-elected. I am so pissed at Blagojevich, what a jerk.
By DeBrcaobj on 01/02/2009 2:58 pm
DianaT
DeB, this opening of the Senate is going to be a mess. I hear they are also going to try to block Al Franken from the floor if the Sec’ty of State(MN) approves the election. We are in too much trouble to have to put up with all this posturing.
By DianaT on 01/02/2009 3:12 pm
DeBrcaobj
I agree. Let’s get down to business and stop the school yard nonsense.
By DeBrcaobj on 01/02/2009 3:52 pm
LindaMason
Hi Diana — And Happy New Year! What you said about the opening of the Senate really got my attention. The Dems worked so hard to get a Senate majority, and now they have 3 controversial Senators — Burris, Franken, and (possibly) Kennedy! Obviously the Kennedy controversy is not in the same category as the Burris and Franken controversies, but it does show that even victory brings its trials and tribulations.
By LindaMason on 01/03/2009 11:30 am
DianaT
Hey, Linda. Happy New Year to you too. What really bothers me is that we will have to endure all of the media attention on these three people, which, of course, will distract every one from the critical issues at hand. And, I still don’t see how Burris can be blocked if the Governor (jerk that he is) of Illinois hasn’t been impeached or removed from office. If the appointment is constitutional in the state, how can it be blocked? Franken is a legitimate senator if the re-count is validated by the Minnesota Sec’y of State, and Kennedy is very legal, albeit temporary until the election date roles around. So, other than political posturing from the opposing side, why put us through all this? You are right~~trials and tribulations, they are.
By DianaT on 01/03/2009 12:02 pm
SJMorgan
Burris has a hundred times the qualifications that Kennedy does. That is not insignificiant! But if the mere ention of the the name “Kennedy” envokes harmony in Camelot….that fits the mideset. I predict that Burris will be re-elected and Kennedy once she has served her usefullnes will not even run!
By SJMorgan on 01/03/2009 10:35 am
DeBrcaobj
Burris has tried several times to get elected to office in Illinois and has failed. He is known for his mediocrity and huge ego here. He won’t be re-elected, in fact, he will probably cost Illinois a Democratic Senator.
By DeBrcaobj on 01/03/2009 3:33 pm
JimHenley
This comment was deleted as it violated the Ten Commandments of Posting on our website.
By JimHenley on 01/03/2009 10:58 pm
DeBrcaobj
It’s amazing that you can support the two semi-literates who can’t compose a coherent sentence between them, Bush and Palin and then make fun of Caroline Kennedy! The fact that she says “umm” and “you know” too much in an off the cuff interview, should make you feel right at home.
By DeBrcaobj on 01/04/2009 11:14 pm
BuhBye
Um, really? Why?
By BuhBye on 01/02/2009 10:28 am