Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 12/17/2008 8:30 am

Change We Can Believe In? Loyal Clinton Sec'y Betty Currie Answers Phones for Obama

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Betty Currie, 1998 © AP

You would think that after being forced to testify five times before a grand jury about her boss’s relationship with Monica Lewinsky, Betty Currie would have had enough of politics.

But apparently she misses it.

Currie, the personal secretary to President Clinton, has come out of obscurity to answer the phones for Barack Obama during his transition to the White House. We’re not sure exactly what she’s doing, but transition team chief John Podesta, who was Clinton’s last White House chief of staff, said it was natural for him to call Currie back to service.

“Of course I asked her because in the 30 years we have worked together, I have never known anyone with more grace, dedication and public spirit than Betty,” Podesta told The New York Times. “And she has one mean Rolodex.”

Currie came out of retirement — living with her husband and Socks, the Clintons’ presidential cat — in southern Maryland to volunteer at Obama headquarters. The Times notes that she is widely admired in Clinton circles for her loyalty and effectiveness.

We all know politicians love loyalty.

Currie remained strong on the stand when being grilled by the special prosecutor about her boss’s dallying with a White House intern a decade ago. Currie used roundabout routes to sneak Lewinsky into the Oval Office, asked the Secret Service not to record the young intern’s visits, came in on weekends to let Lewinsky in to see the president and even waited outside the Oval Office study while Clinton and Lewinsky did their thing with cigars and whatever else. The debate was over whether she was innocent or an enabler.

One would think the churchgoing Currie had a hard time washing the grime off of her after all that. But perhaps she thinks that working for Obama can be a nice change of pace. 

16 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

f p
Politics like heroin is a drug to those close to power.
By f p on 12/17/2008 9:44 am
Belinda Joy
Oh my gosh a face and name from the past! She belongs no where near the White House. If Barack knows what’s good for him, he will come to his senses quickly in this regard. This is a woman who went over and beyond her job AND moral responsibilities as a Christian and American. To know, not just have an inkling or idea, but to know 100% that your President was cheating on his wife and YOU helped him with the rouse….that is the lowest in my mind. None of us will never know the conversations that she may have had with Bill. She may have told him she was uncomfortable with his betrayal? She may have told him she was disappointed in his behavior? We’ll never know. But I do know this. She was loyal in all the worst ways and only she knows why. Was it simply to keep her job, the income or was there a “quid pro quo” that we don’t know about? Barack Obama says he wants to bring honesty back to the White House. Betty was anything but, so to have someone so low in morals even in a minor position of answering his phones is quite concerning to me.
By Belinda Joy on 12/17/2008 10:51 am
Patty E
It is difficult for me to fathom, the obstacles this woman had to overcome, within herself, in order to make the decisions and the choices she was confronted with—-as it was for her predecessors, who also had mistresses while in the White House, facing the same dilemma’s of choice. This is what is known as ‘stuck between a rock and hard place’…I doubt that it was HER choice to sneak Lewinsky into the oval office…..and my belief is that even if she had refused, someone else would have taken her place. Looking at the bigger picture, here, it is Bill Clinton, who should be admonished for taking liberty with his authority, that put her in that position of ‘victim’. That said…..two statements in the article jumped out at me: 1. She is a volunteer, and 2. She has an awesome Rolodex of phone numbers. I remember when I had an ‘awesome Rolodex’….Everybody wanted to be my friend…hahahahaha
By Patty E on 12/17/2008 12:13 pm
Jim Henley
This comment has been removed at the request of management.
By Jim Henley on 12/17/2008 1:25 pm
DeBúrca obj
without Oprah Winfrey Obama doesn’t win the primary”… where did you get such nonsense?
By DeBúrca obj on 12/17/2008 5:17 pm
HA BIBI
Jim, Right on, keep up the good work! I too see the writting on the wall and if I were Michelle, I’d be a little weary of the choice for phone secretary, LOL.
By HA BIBI on 12/17/2008 6:00 pm
Marva Marva
It is just you and maybe “your kind”. I don’t mean that in a mean way but only those who think like you. I, for one, have looked at his past and have found nothing that disturbs me so much that I am concerned about the “security” of this country. In fact, I am excited about our future.
By Marva Marva on 12/18/2008 12:04 am
Johnna Bardolei
Currie can keep secrets and is known for covering and facilitating her former boss’s illicit liaisons. Betty is smart and loyal and her knowledge would be an asset to any politician, plus as a woman of color, that’s another plus. It’s surprising that Obama’s team would consider someone older and retired as up to performing the needed tasks and duties, but good for Obama that Podesta tapped Currie for her experience, charm and efficiency.
By Johnna Bardolei on 12/17/2008 11:16 am
DeBúrca obj
I can understand why she’d be a good choice as far as actual job duties go. Obama is coming into office after 8 years of destruction with an economy moving very quickly toward the 2nd Great Depression and any time saved by having people with experience placed into jobs is a good thing. However, the fact that she helped sneak Lewinsky into the office and hide her presence there, really does make her unsuitable for this position.
By DeBúrca obj on 12/17/2008 12:00 pm
HA BIBI
The debate was over whether she was innocent or an enabler”. This is the bottom line. When you aide and abett the going’s on that you know are wrong and go against your principles, you are an enabler. Furthermore, you are not innocent as you know full well, what you are doing is done in secret and again, against those principles you know to be wrong. Somewhere in one’s life, one must come to the conclusion that they need to decide if they are going to live a life that encompasses integrity, or not. I myself, am not willing to sacrafice my values, morals nor integrity, for the sake of any job or the almighty dollar, that may accompany it. After all, integrity is what you operate under……..When no one is looking.
By HA BIBI on 12/17/2008 6:32 pm
starry Nite
The best predictor of future behavior is a persons past behavior. By Jim Henley on 12/17/2008 2:25 pm Truman came out of a corrupt government and he did okay. There is nothing in Obama’s past that would alarm me. I would rather pal around with Ayers than you based on your posts. You are not well informed and you seem narrow minded. What is your agenda?
By starry Nite on 12/17/2008 7:19 pm
rocky rocky
I don’t recall that Betty Currie was accused of anything more than an uncomfortable situation involving gift giving between the Pres and M.L. but nothing about conspiring with them. Why is everyone suddenly accusing her?
By rocky rocky on 12/17/2008 9:09 pm
Belinda Joy
Rocky, This may have something to do with why many of us are reacting to her in the manner we are. Please read this in its entirety. Belinda http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/1998/10/03/1998-10-03_the_testi…
By Belinda Joy on 12/17/2008 9:43 pm
Cookie M
she took the job because she was asked to by Obama - man, try to keep up. :-)
By Cookie M on 12/19/2008 12:47 am
Belinda Joy
I’ll try and keep up. I didn’t realize anyone on this thread had questioned why she took the job? I think the article was very clear as to who offered her the position. What is your point?
By Belinda Joy on 12/20/2008 11:52 pm