Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 02/05/2009 9:50 am

'The Closer' Michelle Obama Brought in to Do Some Convincing on Economic Stimulus

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
"The Closer" Michelle Obama © Getty
They didn’t call Michelle Obama "the closer" for nothing on the campaign trail.

While her husband was running for president, Michelle Obama was so effective in convincing people to vote for Barack Obama, she earned the nickname fair and square. Now that her family’s in the White House, the First’s Lady’s now using those powers of persuasion for another purpose: to urge the passage of her husband’s controversial economic stimulus package.

While President Obama himself takes to the airwaves and has sent surrogates to the Hill to convince Congress to act fast, Politico says the First Lady isn’t wasting any time, and has used her tours of federal agencies to urge lawmakers to pass the plan now.

"This investment will allow us to put people to work, weatherizing at least two million low-income homes, which will also save working families on average $350 per year in heating costs," she said Wednesday during a visit to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, where she received a resounding reception. "It’s important to remember that these investments will expand the availability of affordable housing by 15,000 units — and that is not insignificant — which, coupled with other homeless programs here at HUD will play an important role in preventing an increase in homelessness during these tough economic times."

Mrs. Obama has also been hosting White House events, touting the Lilly Ledbetter equal-pay legislation, and reading at local schools. No rest for the weary in the Obama White House! "I thought that she would be getting the kids comfortable in school and two or three weeks out, or in a month, after she had talked with all of her staff, there would be a big rollout for her project," First Ladies expert Myra Gutin told Politico. "It’s going to turn out to be an interesting first 100 days for her, as well."

Meanwhile, the First Ladies alma mater, Princeton University, has added her picture to the wall of the prestigious Tap Room in the Nassau Inn – where only the college’s most famous grads are honored. She’s only the second woman to grace the wall, behind Brooke Shields.

"Michelle Obama is a model of sharp intelligence, professional accomplishment, impeccable style, engaged citizenship and commitment to family who has inspired millions of people all over the world," said Valerie Smith, chair of African American studies and the Woodrow Wilson Professor of Literature. "We are proud that a woman of her achievements is the product of sociology and African American studies at Princeton."

181 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Grande Camper
Way to go, Michelle. I hope she can help clear the path to stimulate the economy.
By Grande Camper on 02/05/2009 10:01 am
S.J. Morgan
News this am indicates even Dems are looking at cutting the non job producing “sacred cows” ( not Pork according to them) out to get the votes to pass.
By S.J. Morgan on 02/05/2009 10:15 am
DeBúrca obj
“It’s fair to say that we’ve sufficiently celebrated the milestone of electing our first biracial president, but it’s simply incorrect to assert that hope for Obama’s success is guilt-induced. Fear-induced is more like it. Most want Obama to succeed because they’d like to avoid bread lines in the near future. Conservatives of both parties justly fear that too much of the stimulus package is aimed at non-stimulus programs. There’s plenty to criticize, but shouting socialism in a crowded panic room is laughable under the circumstances. Bush gave Nanny a tenured position in Washington with his Medicare bill, farm subsidies and public education spending. It was under the GOP’s watch that the nationalization of America’s banking and insurance programs began.” - Kathleen Parker, Conservative columnist for the Chicago Tribune
By DeBúrca obj on 02/05/2009 10:59 am
Jeannot Kensinger
Thank you Michelle for trying .
By Jeannot Kensinger on 02/05/2009 10:29 am
Belinda Joy
This is wonderful news. I hope she can be of some benefit.
By Belinda Joy on 02/05/2009 10:32 am
Patty E
I spoke with my Rep., last night, in the House, and he is a Republican. He commented on the House Stim that not one GOP-er voted for….the Republicans blame Pelosi, for not allowring them to debate, question, anything (that is what he says)—-but then when he said ‘then the order came down from the party leaders to vote against it”…I asked him if he would have voted for it had he NOT been ‘ordered’ to vote against it…. I point this out because I am sooooooooooooo frustrated with Congress!!! And with Pelosi, and with the attitude of those in Congress, that the American people are stupid—-yes…they know better, and we are uninformed! Yet they have to be TOLD how to vote! I am listening to the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, right now….and they are talking about the TARP oversight problems….and Shelby is NOW saying that America will NOT make any money back fromt he loan—he ‘doubts’ that we will…says for every $3 given to automotive, we were supposed to get back $1—and he doubts that will even happen…. The Washington Post had an editorial from Obama this morning—-a good one about how serious this condition is, that we as a country are in—-Michelle is working hard—but Congress just doesn’t ‘get it’…. my point? The White House and the Congress are both ‘working hard’…but they are not on the same street filling up the same potholes…..maybe Michelle should speak to Congress!!!!! ha!
By Patty E on 02/05/2009 10:34 am
Bonnie Oliver
Patty E - “….maybe Michelle should speak to Congress!”… Wonderful. It might produce better results than talking with government employees at the Department of Urban Affairs! As for the Stimulus package, it is so mixed up and confusing, how can anyone know what is going on when the final dollar amount keeps changing from $800billion to $924billion and back again. That is an addition of $124 billion! I suggest we wait and see what will be a compromise solution ….and there will be a compromise. The bill as written is deader than a doornail. Pelosi allowed no input from the Republicans - zilch, zero, nada. Okay, the GOP lost the election. But DO NOT then blame the House Republicans for voting NO on a package in which they had no say. What nonsense. The Dems are now down in Virginia at some SPA ….paid for by we the taxpayers… in order to put forth a bill that might garner one or two Republican votes. The Dems are no longer interested in a bi-partisan approach to economic recovery. So be it. You live by the sword; you die by the sword.
By Bonnie Oliver on 02/05/2009 8:42 pm
starry Nite
Where are the repubs gong for their retreat = I am sure that article in the hill didn;t mention that they get taxpayer money to. Live and die by the sword indeed. The republican had input and they keep coming back with the same thing. %100 tax cuts. Not acceptable doesn;t work. I think we will get tax cuts and infrastructure . A stimulus is government spending. !!!!
By starry Nite on 02/05/2009 9:53 pm
Bonnie Oliver
Starry Nite - The Republicans have already had their “retreat” and taxpayer money did not fund it. It is my understanding that they got some lobbyist to pay for it. Better them then us. The House Republicans did not have any say in the bill that was sent to the Senate. It was at the meeting with the President, then one of the GOP members informed the President. Tax cuts do work but the economy is so bad that they can not do it alone. I am all in favor of the government spending money to create jobs or to keep people working. It is better in the long run if the government could first keep the private sector jobs from disappearing as fast as they are. You haven’t heard of anyone being laid off from government work, have you? Stimulus also means “something to quick start an event”. Programs that will not even begin until 2011 or later should be omitted from this bill and, if the Dems want to have a vote later on about a specific project or projects then that is their prerogative as the majority party. The stimulus package is poorly written and one has to admit that the Dems loaded it down with every spending bill they could imagine. Makes one pause and wonder if they really think there is need for stimulus or just a bill for spending.
By Bonnie Oliver on 02/06/2009 12:33 am
Tee Zee
Here’s what’s at stake. If enacted, President Obama’s economic recovery plan will be the biggest and boldest progressive legislation in the past 40 years. These are just some of the highlights: $142 billion for a middle-class tax cut $47 billion to extend unemployment benefits $16 billion to expand food stamps $17 billion in one-time payments to low-income Americans $26 billion to expand access to health care $87 billion to help states pay for Medicaid $24 billion to modernized health information technology $46 billion to fix bridges and roads $80 billion to improve public education $19 billion for school construction $14 billion to make college more affordable Make the calls today. This is what we do. In case you missed it pick up the telephone and call 202-224-3121 (or use the toll-free service at 866-544-7573).
By Tee Zee on 02/05/2009 10:46 am
DeBúrca obj
Great post Tee Zee thank you!
By DeBúrca obj on 02/05/2009 11:01 am
Steve Douglass
Expand food stamps? Expand healthcare? Medicaid? Modernize Information Technology? Bridges and Roads? Improve public education? Make college more affordable? All very very vague. Give me details. Also, none of these stimulate the economy. They create short term projects that when finished, still leave people without work. Nothing long term. Also, most of it could not be implemented or started for at least 2 years. We’d have to wait that long to see any affect. Sounds like Franklin Roosevelts failed WPA programs.
By Steve Douglass on 02/05/2009 3:01 pm
Tee Zee
Well, the tax cuts of the last thirty years got us in this mess…so what are you suggesting?
By Tee Zee on 02/05/2009 3:44 pm
Steve Douglass
No they didn’t. Actually, the tax cuts during the Reagan(peace be upon him) and Bush administrations actually increased the GNP, number of jobs, and tax revenues. The tax policies of Carter(a pox on him) and Clinton both caused recessions. Clinton started raising taxes and at the end of his term we were already in a recession before Bush took office. It was Bush’s tax cuts that got us out of that recession, in spite of the 9/11 attacks. The expenses accrued over the past 30 years that hurt us were the need to force the Soviet downfall by outspending them on defense, and the War on Terror. Oops! I forgot, now that ‘The Messiah’ is in office, we’re not allowed to say ‘War on Terror’ anymore.
By Steve Douglass on 02/05/2009 4:07 pm
Tee Zee
The historical record is exactly the opposite. You can date the point of recovery in all of our economic recoveries at the point where there was a tax rise.
By Tee Zee on 02/05/2009 4:44 pm