Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 01/22/2009 8:50 am

Confirmations of Enviro Heads Lisa Jackson, Nancy Sutley Held Up, But Why?

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Obama enviro picks Lisa Jackson and Nancy Sutley have

to wait for their Senate confirmations © AP

There’s some mystery building in Washington, where the senatorial confirmations of Lisa Jackson and Nancy Sutley have been held up by an unknown opponent.

CQ Politics reports that Environmental Protection Agency chief nominee Jackson, and Sutley – named to chair President Obama’s White House Council on Environmental Quality – have been delayed, but no one seems to know why. "The identity of the senator holding up the nominations and the reason for blocking them could not be immediately determined," CQ says. It only takes one senator to object to delay a vote on a nominee.

The two women together went before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee to answer questions for four and a half grueling hours.

During that hearing, Jackson of New Jersey promised to put science before politics — a direct slap to the Bush administration, which came under heavy fire for perceived political interference at the agency and for being too close to industry. But the 46-year-old evaded questions — some of which came from Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-CA, on whether she would immediately grant authority to California and 16 other states to regulate vehicle tailpipe emissions. She also failed to answer questions on whether and how the agency would address regulation of carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act.

For her part, Sutley vowed that if confirmed, she would ensure that "there is a strong science and policy basis for our environmental policy, to move the nation to greater reliance on clean energy and increase energy security, to combat global warming while growing the green economy, to protect public health and the environment, especially in vulnerable communities, and to protect and restore our great ecosystems."

Now, if only these women could get the green light and get to work!

14 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Belinda Joy
Things that make you say Hmmmmmm……?
By Belinda Joy on 01/22/2009 9:07 am
f p
Probabl;y that Texas fool Cornyn. or another knuckle-dragger of his ilk.
By f p on 01/22/2009 9:08 am
Patty E
That was EXACTLY my first thought! Why? Remember in the campaign when McCain cam out with the advertisement that showed a picture of windmills? When I checked his voting record on alternatives—-he was consistent—-he voted NO every time…Remember when we were all looking up the list of who donated money to whom? OIL was mcCains’ backer——guess why he voted against alternatives? Guess why he picked Palin as his running mate? Guess why CHINA got the right to the oil in Iraq!? and not the USA? I think OIL companies are behind this—-and I think too, hold on to your seats—-Cheney is behind this…it is no coincidence, that instead of moving back to his home state, he chose to go to McClean—to be CLOSE to Washington DC—to be ‘menacing’…. The Bush administration has aways been for OIL—-never for alternatives…alternatives will take control of this country AWAY from the oil companies—-no wonder there hold was from “ANONYMOUS” —-they haven’t got the guts to speak out in public…they might lose their Congressional seat, after all…anOTHER loss of ‘controlling power’!
By Patty E on 01/22/2009 11:39 am
gulliver fourmyle
bush/cheney oil? gee, what a surprise—-been going on for over a century—-so long as citizens refuse to look? how may they see????????
By gulliver fourmyle on 01/22/2009 1:37 pm
f p
Patty I wouldn’t at all be surprised—Cornyn is in the pocket of big oil—Cheney is—all one has to do is look at his no bid contract with his former company Halliburton.
By f p on 01/22/2009 2:53 pm
Chrome Toe
hmmmm….
By Chrome Toe on 01/22/2009 9:10 am
Grande Camper
Something going to come out of this - just don’t know what.
By Grande Camper on 01/22/2009 9:54 am
Roger from Ohio
good lord…… lets just get these people confirmed so the improvement of America can begin. Maybe these people just want to get their name in the news….. did you see Rachel Maddow last night? She refused to use John Cornyn name when she talked about him blocking both Hillary Clinton and Eric Holder’s confirmations.
By Roger from Ohio on 01/22/2009 10:36 am
Libra Lady
Good Lord”!!! (that is such a CUTE way to express yourself roger) Madcow probably didn’t know how to pronounce his name…I mean she isn’t the sharpest knife in the drawer, and her ratings are proving that!!! I can understand though why you support her….need I say more????
By Libra Lady on 01/22/2009 11:43 am
Patty E
hahaha…actually, I wouldn;t mind if you said ‘less’…with one exception: if you are willing to discuss an issue…speak up. If your goal is to insult the other posters personally, as seems to be your norm—-please speak less. You are welcome…happy to help.
By Patty E on 01/22/2009 6:59 pm
Roger from Ohio
Yes Libra “Lady”… say more….. just what are you eluding to when you comment to me? You make wrong comments…… refuse to answer direct questions, but expect others to kowtow to you and you “infinite wisdom” So tell us “lady” what are you “trying” not to say?
By Roger from Ohio on 01/22/2009 11:57 am
f p
Roger—is not worth the effort—let it go— ignore the stupidity.
By f p on 01/22/2009 2:39 pm
Roger from Ohio
Thanks Frank….. but I know she doesnt have the guts to speak what she is thinking….. she doesnt know how to speak without hating….. thats how those 27% that support Bush is like……. defend him……. hate everyone else. what cracks me up the most is, she is trying to hurt my feelings…….. she isnt stupid…. she is irrelevant.
By Roger from Ohio on 01/22/2009 3:00 pm
f p
Irrelevant—the key word, Rog—take it easy eh?
By f p on 01/22/2009 5:01 pm