Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 11/13/2008 7:22 am

As Connecticut Welcomes Gay Marriage, Debate Over California's Ban Continues

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
©AP

It’s a trying time for gay activists.

On the one hand, gay and lesbian Americans can celebrate a major win in Connecticut, which yesterday began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. That move came after the state’s Supreme Court ruled last month the state’s civil unions simply weren’t equal, thus opening the door to official marriage.

Ben Klein, a senior lawyer with Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, heralded the move as a tremendous step for America’s democratic promise: “Today Connecticut sends a message of hope and promise to lesbian and gay people throughout the country who want to be treated as equal citizens by their government’s living proof that marriage equality is moving forward in this country.”

That’s certainly true, but Connecticut’s watershed moment will be muddied by the debate over California’s gay marriage. That state’s Supreme Court also struck down a gay marriage ban as unconstitutional, but angry conservatives rallied their troops and put forth Proposition 8, a ballot measure that successfully overturned the Golden State’s same-sex nuptials.

Gays, however, aren’t going to take this restriction lying down and have been organizing protests from coast-to-coast. Already they’ve staged dozens of vigils, protests and boycotts in California, but the movement’s definitely gaining steam on the east coast. According to Gay City News, an estimated 10,000 people gathered outside the Mormon Church’s Midtown headquarters in New York yesterday to protest the church’s lead role in passing Proposition 8. Lawyers and other interested parties have also filed lawsuits asking California’s courts to overturn Proposition 8, a move that has drawn widespread support from politicians, including Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Emotions definitely play a large role in the widespread opposition, but let’s not discount the power of technology. The Los Angeles Times reports today that most of these actions have been organized by young, internet-savvy activists. For example, San Francisco-based lawyer Trent Thornley created a Facebook page, "Californians Ready to Repeal Prop. 8" the day after the election and has already amassed 20,000 supporters.

Regardless of where one stands on this matter, it’s clear that the Proposition 8 battle - and its technological outposts - has awakened a new generation of activists, gay and straight. Thirty-year old Andrew Oldershaw remarks, "It took a catastrophe like this to really wake people up." It also doesn’t hurt that there’s scads of celebrity support for gay marriage, perhaps most pointedly from lesbian entertainer Ellen DeGeneres, whose marriage to her lady-love, Portia De Rossi now hangs in limbo.

DeGeneres recently spoke to gay journalist Greg Hernandez and expressed her own emotional turmoil. Said DeGeneres, "I think the next day (after the election) a lot of people felt energized about Obama and excited for that then there was that big, loud voice saying, ‘You are not equal to us’ and that feels bad - really, really bad. A loud voice saying, ‘You don’t deserve the same rights.’ So it took a little bit of air out of me from the night before."

41 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

phyllis Doyle Pepe
I am so proud that my state has gone forth on this issue. I have written before of my fury at this country’s stance on gay marriage––it’s desperate clinging to such apparent lack of equality. I especially find it difficult to comprehend those that advocate racial equality and yet deny homosexuals the same rights as heterosexuals–––it’s wrong, it’s unconstitutional, and it will be changed eventually.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 11/13/2008 8:30 am
EKA -
I join Phyllis, a fellow nutmegger, in being proud of our state. We are smart, progressive, non-judgemental, and always ahead of the curve. The rest of you will catch up eventually, but once again, we lead the way. Bravo ! …. now, if someone would just take Joe Leiberman off our hands.
By EKA - on 11/13/2008 9:26 am
Susan B
Yeah, what happened there? You guys elected him! :-)
By Susan B on 11/13/2008 4:19 pm
Bonnie Oliver
What I find so amazing is that President-Elect Obama does not favor gay marriage and is not among those being criticized by the proponents of the measure.
By Bonnie Oliver on 11/13/2008 9:36 am
sibelle daubigne
Bonnie, don’t you know by now that Obama is a cool pawn, so just be patient!
By sibelle daubigne on 11/13/2008 10:07 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Bonnie: I don’t believe for one moment that Obama is against gay marriage. I’ve send this before and I’ll say it again––it’s part of the DMC’s platform and if you want to get elected you have got to go along with some go alongs that you don’t necessarily want to go along with. There are people–many, in fact, that will or won’t vote for someone over ONE bloody issue. And this particular issue causes shivers down a lot of backsides.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 11/13/2008 1:02 pm
Bonnie Oliver
Phyllis - He was asked the question and replied that in compliance with his faith he would not support gay marriage.. He does favor gay unions or partnerships.
By Bonnie Oliver on 11/13/2008 4:01 pm
Bonnie Oliver
To the WoW staff - Is there any particular reason why Condoleezza Rice’s photograph is shown with this story about gay marriage?
By Bonnie Oliver on 11/13/2008 4:19 pm
phyllis Doyle Pepe
I was wondering the same thing. Are we to assume she is gay?
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 11/13/2008 5:06 pm
phyllis Doyle Pepe
That’s what he had to say. From everything I’ve read about him including his own books, for him to not support gay marriage just doesn’t fit. He is not directed by a faith that discriminates––––––but–––––if he is than he is not the man I think he is.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 11/13/2008 5:04 pm
gulliver fourmyle
this may surprise—-but ‘limited-partnerships’ have near ‘Inc.’ benefits—-economically beyond the economics of marriage. if gays yearn for some ‘being married means zip’. vs. economic basis? well, as crazy as heteros and big weddings—-never saw one last—-then again ‘gay’ SOs could incorporate—-costs vary by state—-but the ‘Inc.-provided’ tax-shelters are quite awesome (ex-ceo here, you employees have No idea!), prob offset cost—- the fact that Obama included ‘partnerships’? as that ‘entity’ (i am not an attorney, just annoying years w/staff)—-well, as most religio-nuts have -0 awareness of biz-law—-i feel he chose to ‘stay-below-nuts-radar’—-some ‘partnerships’ are as baby incs.—-Big Benefits—- then again—-facing a ‘sea-o-nuts’ bunch, being 50% (any %!) Black—-i doubt his chances had any holes—-he needed those ‘border’ votes—-and had them—-i’m amazed it was such victory—-any—-‘the times, they are a chaingin’——i hope in timely fashion—-
By gulliver fourmyle on 11/13/2008 9:28 pm
gulliver fourmyle
well, who would see? as you note, or 60’s Dylan, ‘The masters make the rules, for the wise men or the fools’—-ya gotta work with what’s there—-like showing up to run a wild car company—-(it’s there, a mess—-but worse—-where do ya start?)——Obama bid for ‘i’ll fix this mess.’ and got the job-of-work—-he may certainly lay a foundation via Constitutional Law for so many issues—-‘yank those law-books!’
By gulliver fourmyle on 11/13/2008 9:49 pm
Catherine Kaiman
God Bless Connecticut! This is wonderful news!
By Catherine Kaiman on 11/13/2008 11:27 am
John G
We just have too many religious nuts in CA… :-( Good-on-ya, Connecticut!
By John G on 11/13/2008 11:31 am
Sandbee (FB) 54
You think you have them, try living in Texas, we grew the tree.
By Sandbee (FB) 54 on 11/13/2008 12:02 pm